'Online' geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during an acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions

Len Gray, Lucy Dakin, Steven Counsell, Helen Edwards, Richard Wootton, Melinda Martin-Khan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been shown to improve patient outcomes, but the geriatricians who deliver it are in short-supply. A web-based method of comprehensive geriatric assessment has been developed with the potential to improve access to specialist geriatric expertise. The current study aims to test the reliability and safety of comprehensive geriatric assessment performed "online" in making geriatric triage decisions. It will also explore the accuracy of the procedure in identifying common geriatric syndromes, and its cost relative to conventional "live" consultations. Methods/Design. The study population will consist of 270 acutely hospitalized patients referred for geriatric consultation at three sites. Paired assessments (live and online) will be conducted by independent, blinded geriatricians and the level of agreement examined. This will be compared with the level of agreement between two independent, blinded geriatricians each consulting with the patient in person (i.e. "live"). Agreement between the triage decision from live-live assessments and between the triage decision from live-online assessments will be calculated using kappa statistics. Agreement between the online and live detection of common geriatric syndromes will also be assessed using kappa statistics. Resource use data will be collected for online and live-live assessments to allow comparison between the two procedures. Discussion. If the online approach is found to be less precise than live assessment, further analysis will seek to identify patient subgroups where disagreement is more likely. This may enable a protocol to be developed that avoids unsafe clinical decisions at a distance. Trial registration. Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000936921.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number10
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 21 2012

Fingerprint

Episode of Care
Geriatric Assessment
Triage
Geriatrics
Referral and Consultation
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis
Population
Geriatricians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

'Online' geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during an acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions. / Gray, Len; Dakin, Lucy; Counsell, Steven; Edwards, Helen; Wootton, Richard; Martin-Khan, Melinda.

In: BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 12, 10, 21.03.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e0f893e796764df687d1532d3c4a6b44,
title = "'Online' geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during an acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions",
abstract = "Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been shown to improve patient outcomes, but the geriatricians who deliver it are in short-supply. A web-based method of comprehensive geriatric assessment has been developed with the potential to improve access to specialist geriatric expertise. The current study aims to test the reliability and safety of comprehensive geriatric assessment performed {"}online{"} in making geriatric triage decisions. It will also explore the accuracy of the procedure in identifying common geriatric syndromes, and its cost relative to conventional {"}live{"} consultations. Methods/Design. The study population will consist of 270 acutely hospitalized patients referred for geriatric consultation at three sites. Paired assessments (live and online) will be conducted by independent, blinded geriatricians and the level of agreement examined. This will be compared with the level of agreement between two independent, blinded geriatricians each consulting with the patient in person (i.e. {"}live{"}). Agreement between the triage decision from live-live assessments and between the triage decision from live-online assessments will be calculated using kappa statistics. Agreement between the online and live detection of common geriatric syndromes will also be assessed using kappa statistics. Resource use data will be collected for online and live-live assessments to allow comparison between the two procedures. Discussion. If the online approach is found to be less precise than live assessment, further analysis will seek to identify patient subgroups where disagreement is more likely. This may enable a protocol to be developed that avoids unsafe clinical decisions at a distance. Trial registration. Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000936921.",
author = "Len Gray and Lucy Dakin and Steven Counsell and Helen Edwards and Richard Wootton and Melinda Martin-Khan",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2318-12-10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Geriatrics",
issn = "1471-2318",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Online' geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during an acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions

AU - Gray, Len

AU - Dakin, Lucy

AU - Counsell, Steven

AU - Edwards, Helen

AU - Wootton, Richard

AU - Martin-Khan, Melinda

PY - 2012/3/21

Y1 - 2012/3/21

N2 - Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been shown to improve patient outcomes, but the geriatricians who deliver it are in short-supply. A web-based method of comprehensive geriatric assessment has been developed with the potential to improve access to specialist geriatric expertise. The current study aims to test the reliability and safety of comprehensive geriatric assessment performed "online" in making geriatric triage decisions. It will also explore the accuracy of the procedure in identifying common geriatric syndromes, and its cost relative to conventional "live" consultations. Methods/Design. The study population will consist of 270 acutely hospitalized patients referred for geriatric consultation at three sites. Paired assessments (live and online) will be conducted by independent, blinded geriatricians and the level of agreement examined. This will be compared with the level of agreement between two independent, blinded geriatricians each consulting with the patient in person (i.e. "live"). Agreement between the triage decision from live-live assessments and between the triage decision from live-online assessments will be calculated using kappa statistics. Agreement between the online and live detection of common geriatric syndromes will also be assessed using kappa statistics. Resource use data will be collected for online and live-live assessments to allow comparison between the two procedures. Discussion. If the online approach is found to be less precise than live assessment, further analysis will seek to identify patient subgroups where disagreement is more likely. This may enable a protocol to be developed that avoids unsafe clinical decisions at a distance. Trial registration. Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000936921.

AB - Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment has been shown to improve patient outcomes, but the geriatricians who deliver it are in short-supply. A web-based method of comprehensive geriatric assessment has been developed with the potential to improve access to specialist geriatric expertise. The current study aims to test the reliability and safety of comprehensive geriatric assessment performed "online" in making geriatric triage decisions. It will also explore the accuracy of the procedure in identifying common geriatric syndromes, and its cost relative to conventional "live" consultations. Methods/Design. The study population will consist of 270 acutely hospitalized patients referred for geriatric consultation at three sites. Paired assessments (live and online) will be conducted by independent, blinded geriatricians and the level of agreement examined. This will be compared with the level of agreement between two independent, blinded geriatricians each consulting with the patient in person (i.e. "live"). Agreement between the triage decision from live-live assessments and between the triage decision from live-online assessments will be calculated using kappa statistics. Agreement between the online and live detection of common geriatric syndromes will also be assessed using kappa statistics. Resource use data will be collected for online and live-live assessments to allow comparison between the two procedures. Discussion. If the online approach is found to be less precise than live assessment, further analysis will seek to identify patient subgroups where disagreement is more likely. This may enable a protocol to be developed that avoids unsafe clinical decisions at a distance. Trial registration. Trial registration number: ACTRN12611000936921.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858432945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858432945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2318-12-10

DO - 10.1186/1471-2318-12-10

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22433175

AN - SCOPUS:84858432945

VL - 12

JO - BMC Geriatrics

JF - BMC Geriatrics

SN - 1471-2318

M1 - 10

ER -