Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers

Indicators of quality in manuscripts

Molly C. Dougherty, Margaret C. Freda, Margaret H. Kearney, Judith Gedney Baggs, Marion Broome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)506-521
Number of pages16
JournalWestern Journal of Nursing Research
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Nursing
Research
Journal Impact Factor
Surveys and Questionnaires
Nurses

Keywords

  • journal impact factor
  • nursing research
  • peer review
  • publishing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers : Indicators of quality in manuscripts. / Dougherty, Molly C.; Freda, Margaret C.; Kearney, Margaret H.; Baggs, Judith Gedney; Broome, Marion.

In: Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, 06.2011, p. 506-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dougherty, Molly C. ; Freda, Margaret C. ; Kearney, Margaret H. ; Baggs, Judith Gedney ; Broome, Marion. / Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers : Indicators of quality in manuscripts. In: Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2011 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 506-521.
@article{ff59c467f4934b0aa75d7f6256cab891,
title = "Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: Indicators of quality in manuscripts",
abstract = "Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.",
keywords = "journal impact factor, nursing research, peer review, publishing",
author = "Dougherty, {Molly C.} and Freda, {Margaret C.} and Kearney, {Margaret H.} and Baggs, {Judith Gedney} and Marion Broome",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0193945910385715",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "506--521",
journal = "Western Journal of Nursing Research",
issn = "0193-9459",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers

T2 - Indicators of quality in manuscripts

AU - Dougherty, Molly C.

AU - Freda, Margaret C.

AU - Kearney, Margaret H.

AU - Baggs, Judith Gedney

AU - Broome, Marion

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

AB - Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

KW - journal impact factor

KW - nursing research

KW - peer review

KW - publishing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955548010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0193945910385715

DO - 10.1177/0193945910385715

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 506

EP - 521

JO - Western Journal of Nursing Research

JF - Western Journal of Nursing Research

SN - 0193-9459

IS - 4

ER -