Operating Characteristics of PROMIS Four-Item Depression and Anxiety Scales in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain

Kurt Kroenke, Zhangsheng Yu, Jingwei Wu, Jacob Kean, Patrick Monahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Depression and anxiety are prevalent in patients with chronic pain and adversely affect pain, quality of life, and treatment response. The purpose of this psychometric study was to determine the reliability and validity of the four-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression and anxiety scales in patients with chronic pain. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Stepped Care to Optimize Pain care Effectiveness study, a randomized clinical trial of optimized analgesic therapy. Setting: Five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center (RVAMC) in Indianapolis, Indiana. Subjects: Two hundred forty-four primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: All patients completed the four-item depression and anxiety scales from the PROMIS 29-item profile, as well as several other validated psychological measures. The minimally important difference (MID) using the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated for each scale, and convergent validity was assessed by interscale correlations at baseline and 3 months. Operating characteristics of the PROMIS measures for detecting patients who had probable major depression or were anxiety-disorder screen-positive were calculated. Results: The PROMIS scales had good internal reliability, and the MID (as represented by two SEMs) was 2 points for the depression scale and 2.5 points for the anxiety scale. Convergent validity was supported by strong interscale correlations. The optimal screening cutpoint on the 4- to 20-point PROMIS scales appeared to be 8 for both the depression and anxiety scales. Conclusions: The PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales are reasonable options as ultra-brief measures for screening in patients with chronic pain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1892-1901
Number of pages10
JournalPain Medicine
Volume15
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

Fingerprint

Information Systems
Chronic Pain
Primary Health Care
Anxiety
Depression
Pain
Musculoskeletal Pain
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Anxiety Disorders
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Analgesics
Randomized Controlled Trials
Quality of Life
Psychology
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Pain
  • PROMIS
  • Psychometrics
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Operating Characteristics of PROMIS Four-Item Depression and Anxiety Scales in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain. / Kroenke, Kurt; Yu, Zhangsheng; Wu, Jingwei; Kean, Jacob; Monahan, Patrick.

In: Pain Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 11, 01.11.2014, p. 1892-1901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ad743535b57d475bb0d5c87dcab55ee7,
title = "Operating Characteristics of PROMIS Four-Item Depression and Anxiety Scales in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain",
abstract = "Objective: Depression and anxiety are prevalent in patients with chronic pain and adversely affect pain, quality of life, and treatment response. The purpose of this psychometric study was to determine the reliability and validity of the four-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression and anxiety scales in patients with chronic pain. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Stepped Care to Optimize Pain care Effectiveness study, a randomized clinical trial of optimized analgesic therapy. Setting: Five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center (RVAMC) in Indianapolis, Indiana. Subjects: Two hundred forty-four primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: All patients completed the four-item depression and anxiety scales from the PROMIS 29-item profile, as well as several other validated psychological measures. The minimally important difference (MID) using the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated for each scale, and convergent validity was assessed by interscale correlations at baseline and 3 months. Operating characteristics of the PROMIS measures for detecting patients who had probable major depression or were anxiety-disorder screen-positive were calculated. Results: The PROMIS scales had good internal reliability, and the MID (as represented by two SEMs) was 2 points for the depression scale and 2.5 points for the anxiety scale. Convergent validity was supported by strong interscale correlations. The optimal screening cutpoint on the 4- to 20-point PROMIS scales appeared to be 8 for both the depression and anxiety scales. Conclusions: The PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales are reasonable options as ultra-brief measures for screening in patients with chronic pain.",
keywords = "Anxiety, Depression, Pain, PROMIS, Psychometrics, Screening",
author = "Kurt Kroenke and Zhangsheng Yu and Jingwei Wu and Jacob Kean and Patrick Monahan",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pme.12537",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1892--1901",
journal = "Pain Medicine",
issn = "1526-2375",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Operating Characteristics of PROMIS Four-Item Depression and Anxiety Scales in Primary Care Patients with Chronic Pain

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Yu, Zhangsheng

AU - Wu, Jingwei

AU - Kean, Jacob

AU - Monahan, Patrick

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Objective: Depression and anxiety are prevalent in patients with chronic pain and adversely affect pain, quality of life, and treatment response. The purpose of this psychometric study was to determine the reliability and validity of the four-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression and anxiety scales in patients with chronic pain. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Stepped Care to Optimize Pain care Effectiveness study, a randomized clinical trial of optimized analgesic therapy. Setting: Five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center (RVAMC) in Indianapolis, Indiana. Subjects: Two hundred forty-four primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: All patients completed the four-item depression and anxiety scales from the PROMIS 29-item profile, as well as several other validated psychological measures. The minimally important difference (MID) using the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated for each scale, and convergent validity was assessed by interscale correlations at baseline and 3 months. Operating characteristics of the PROMIS measures for detecting patients who had probable major depression or were anxiety-disorder screen-positive were calculated. Results: The PROMIS scales had good internal reliability, and the MID (as represented by two SEMs) was 2 points for the depression scale and 2.5 points for the anxiety scale. Convergent validity was supported by strong interscale correlations. The optimal screening cutpoint on the 4- to 20-point PROMIS scales appeared to be 8 for both the depression and anxiety scales. Conclusions: The PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales are reasonable options as ultra-brief measures for screening in patients with chronic pain.

AB - Objective: Depression and anxiety are prevalent in patients with chronic pain and adversely affect pain, quality of life, and treatment response. The purpose of this psychometric study was to determine the reliability and validity of the four-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression and anxiety scales in patients with chronic pain. Design: Secondary analysis of data from the Stepped Care to Optimize Pain care Effectiveness study, a randomized clinical trial of optimized analgesic therapy. Setting: Five primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center (RVAMC) in Indianapolis, Indiana. Subjects: Two hundred forty-four primary care patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: All patients completed the four-item depression and anxiety scales from the PROMIS 29-item profile, as well as several other validated psychological measures. The minimally important difference (MID) using the standard error of measurement (SEM) was calculated for each scale, and convergent validity was assessed by interscale correlations at baseline and 3 months. Operating characteristics of the PROMIS measures for detecting patients who had probable major depression or were anxiety-disorder screen-positive were calculated. Results: The PROMIS scales had good internal reliability, and the MID (as represented by two SEMs) was 2 points for the depression scale and 2.5 points for the anxiety scale. Convergent validity was supported by strong interscale correlations. The optimal screening cutpoint on the 4- to 20-point PROMIS scales appeared to be 8 for both the depression and anxiety scales. Conclusions: The PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales are reasonable options as ultra-brief measures for screening in patients with chronic pain.

KW - Anxiety

KW - Depression

KW - Pain

KW - PROMIS

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911984896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911984896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pme.12537

DO - 10.1111/pme.12537

M3 - Article

C2 - 25138978

AN - SCOPUS:84911984896

VL - 15

SP - 1892

EP - 1901

JO - Pain Medicine

JF - Pain Medicine

SN - 1526-2375

IS - 11

ER -