Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization

Liang Tang, Shien-Fong Lin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Defibrillation with strong shocks of several hundred volts is still the most effective way to terminate life-threatening cardiac rhythm abnormalities such as ventricular fibrillation (VF). The standing puzzle that has lasted for several decades is why defibrillate with such a high voltage when the activation threshold of cardiac myocytes is much less than 100 mV. Such a conceptual conflict has prompted many theoretical and experimental studies to understand the action of strong shocks.1-7 An important goal in defibrillation study is to reduce the shock energy requirement. Because the quality of life in patients carrying implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is significantly affected by the occurrence of shocks, efforts have been made to decrease the shock energy for less pain and battery drain.8-10 Major progress came in the 1980s when it was realized that biphasic shocks were far superior to monophasic shocks for defibrillation.11,12 Since then, empirical studies of defibrillation waveforms have identified only marginal improvements, suggesting that empirical variation of defibrillation waveform is unlikely to result in conceptual breakthroughs or significant improvements in defibrillation efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications
PublisherSpringer US
Pages381-397
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9780387794020
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Ventricular Fibrillation
Shock
Implantable Defibrillators
Cardiac Myocytes
Theoretical Models
Quality of Life
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Tang, L., & Lin, S-F. (2009). Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization. In Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications (pp. 381-397). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15

Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization. / Tang, Liang; Lin, Shien-Fong.

Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications. Springer US, 2009. p. 381-397.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Tang, L & Lin, S-F 2009, Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization. in Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications. Springer US, pp. 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15
Tang L, Lin S-F. Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization. In Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications. Springer US. 2009. p. 381-397 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15
Tang, Liang ; Lin, Shien-Fong. / Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization. Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications. Springer US, 2009. pp. 381-397
@inbook{b813176c9fe240ac9796f01940d15485,
title = "Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization",
abstract = "Defibrillation with strong shocks of several hundred volts is still the most effective way to terminate life-threatening cardiac rhythm abnormalities such as ventricular fibrillation (VF). The standing puzzle that has lasted for several decades is why defibrillate with such a high voltage when the activation threshold of cardiac myocytes is much less than 100 mV. Such a conceptual conflict has prompted many theoretical and experimental studies to understand the action of strong shocks.1-7 An important goal in defibrillation study is to reduce the shock energy requirement. Because the quality of life in patients carrying implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is significantly affected by the occurrence of shocks, efforts have been made to decrease the shock energy for less pain and battery drain.8-10 Major progress came in the 1980s when it was realized that biphasic shocks were far superior to monophasic shocks for defibrillation.11,12 Since then, empirical studies of defibrillation waveforms have identified only marginal improvements, suggesting that empirical variation of defibrillation waveform is unlikely to result in conceptual breakthroughs or significant improvements in defibrillation efficacy.",
author = "Liang Tang and Shien-Fong Lin",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780387794020",
pages = "381--397",
booktitle = "Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications",
publisher = "Springer US",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Optical mapping of multisite ventricular fibrillation synchronization

AU - Tang, Liang

AU - Lin, Shien-Fong

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Defibrillation with strong shocks of several hundred volts is still the most effective way to terminate life-threatening cardiac rhythm abnormalities such as ventricular fibrillation (VF). The standing puzzle that has lasted for several decades is why defibrillate with such a high voltage when the activation threshold of cardiac myocytes is much less than 100 mV. Such a conceptual conflict has prompted many theoretical and experimental studies to understand the action of strong shocks.1-7 An important goal in defibrillation study is to reduce the shock energy requirement. Because the quality of life in patients carrying implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is significantly affected by the occurrence of shocks, efforts have been made to decrease the shock energy for less pain and battery drain.8-10 Major progress came in the 1980s when it was realized that biphasic shocks were far superior to monophasic shocks for defibrillation.11,12 Since then, empirical studies of defibrillation waveforms have identified only marginal improvements, suggesting that empirical variation of defibrillation waveform is unlikely to result in conceptual breakthroughs or significant improvements in defibrillation efficacy.

AB - Defibrillation with strong shocks of several hundred volts is still the most effective way to terminate life-threatening cardiac rhythm abnormalities such as ventricular fibrillation (VF). The standing puzzle that has lasted for several decades is why defibrillate with such a high voltage when the activation threshold of cardiac myocytes is much less than 100 mV. Such a conceptual conflict has prompted many theoretical and experimental studies to understand the action of strong shocks.1-7 An important goal in defibrillation study is to reduce the shock energy requirement. Because the quality of life in patients carrying implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is significantly affected by the occurrence of shocks, efforts have been made to decrease the shock energy for less pain and battery drain.8-10 Major progress came in the 1980s when it was realized that biphasic shocks were far superior to monophasic shocks for defibrillation.11,12 Since then, empirical studies of defibrillation waveforms have identified only marginal improvements, suggesting that empirical variation of defibrillation waveform is unlikely to result in conceptual breakthroughs or significant improvements in defibrillation efficacy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891448973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891448973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-79403-7_15

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84891448973

SN - 9780387794020

SP - 381

EP - 397

BT - Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy: Mechanisms and Practical Implications

PB - Springer US

ER -