Orthopaedic implants in children

Survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists

Randall Loder, Judy R. Feinberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The role of orthopaedic implant removal in children is controversial. Some children later require adult reconstruction; implant removal may be difficult or may adversely affect the outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the opinions of the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists regarding routine implant removal in children. Participants were asked to complete a Web-based questionnaire containing demographics, general opinions, and a series of specific case scenarios related to implant removal/retention. The study group consisted of 273 pediatric, and 99 nonpediatric specialists, with an average of 17-year experience. Regarding asymptomatic, stainless steel implants in children, 41% indicated removal most or all of the time, 36% reported sometimes, and the remaining 22% reported almost never or never. Implant location was the only important factor in the decision to remove or retain the implant. A greater percentage of pediatric specialists endorsed implant retention in the hip or pelvis in older children compared with nonpediatric specialists. More experienced surgeons, regardless of specialty area, recommended implant removal. Pediatric specialists may wish to reconsider their preference to retain large hip implants in older children because their nonpediatric colleagues, who presumably are faced with the removal from these children when they reach adulthood, recommend implant removal once they have served their purpose. The number of such cases and the role of early removal in improving the long-term outcome need further study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)510-519
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

Orthopedics
Pediatrics
Hip
Stainless Steel
Surveys and Questionnaires
Pelvis
Demography

Keywords

  • Adult reconstruction
  • Children
  • Implant
  • Questionnaire
  • Removal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Orthopaedic implants in children : Survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists. / Loder, Randall; Feinberg, Judy R.

In: Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 07.2006, p. 510-519.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dcc4fdfbfe084d1c9640bdd89dc4914f,
title = "Orthopaedic implants in children: Survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists",
abstract = "The role of orthopaedic implant removal in children is controversial. Some children later require adult reconstruction; implant removal may be difficult or may adversely affect the outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the opinions of the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists regarding routine implant removal in children. Participants were asked to complete a Web-based questionnaire containing demographics, general opinions, and a series of specific case scenarios related to implant removal/retention. The study group consisted of 273 pediatric, and 99 nonpediatric specialists, with an average of 17-year experience. Regarding asymptomatic, stainless steel implants in children, 41{\%} indicated removal most or all of the time, 36{\%} reported sometimes, and the remaining 22{\%} reported almost never or never. Implant location was the only important factor in the decision to remove or retain the implant. A greater percentage of pediatric specialists endorsed implant retention in the hip or pelvis in older children compared with nonpediatric specialists. More experienced surgeons, regardless of specialty area, recommended implant removal. Pediatric specialists may wish to reconsider their preference to retain large hip implants in older children because their nonpediatric colleagues, who presumably are faced with the removal from these children when they reach adulthood, recommend implant removal once they have served their purpose. The number of such cases and the role of early removal in improving the long-term outcome need further study.",
keywords = "Adult reconstruction, Children, Implant, Questionnaire, Removal",
author = "Randall Loder and Feinberg, {Judy R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.bpo.0000214924.02939.62",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "510--519",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics",
issn = "0271-6798",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthopaedic implants in children

T2 - Survey results regarding routine removal by the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists

AU - Loder, Randall

AU - Feinberg, Judy R.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - The role of orthopaedic implant removal in children is controversial. Some children later require adult reconstruction; implant removal may be difficult or may adversely affect the outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the opinions of the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists regarding routine implant removal in children. Participants were asked to complete a Web-based questionnaire containing demographics, general opinions, and a series of specific case scenarios related to implant removal/retention. The study group consisted of 273 pediatric, and 99 nonpediatric specialists, with an average of 17-year experience. Regarding asymptomatic, stainless steel implants in children, 41% indicated removal most or all of the time, 36% reported sometimes, and the remaining 22% reported almost never or never. Implant location was the only important factor in the decision to remove or retain the implant. A greater percentage of pediatric specialists endorsed implant retention in the hip or pelvis in older children compared with nonpediatric specialists. More experienced surgeons, regardless of specialty area, recommended implant removal. Pediatric specialists may wish to reconsider their preference to retain large hip implants in older children because their nonpediatric colleagues, who presumably are faced with the removal from these children when they reach adulthood, recommend implant removal once they have served their purpose. The number of such cases and the role of early removal in improving the long-term outcome need further study.

AB - The role of orthopaedic implant removal in children is controversial. Some children later require adult reconstruction; implant removal may be difficult or may adversely affect the outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the opinions of the pediatric and nonpediatric specialists regarding routine implant removal in children. Participants were asked to complete a Web-based questionnaire containing demographics, general opinions, and a series of specific case scenarios related to implant removal/retention. The study group consisted of 273 pediatric, and 99 nonpediatric specialists, with an average of 17-year experience. Regarding asymptomatic, stainless steel implants in children, 41% indicated removal most or all of the time, 36% reported sometimes, and the remaining 22% reported almost never or never. Implant location was the only important factor in the decision to remove or retain the implant. A greater percentage of pediatric specialists endorsed implant retention in the hip or pelvis in older children compared with nonpediatric specialists. More experienced surgeons, regardless of specialty area, recommended implant removal. Pediatric specialists may wish to reconsider their preference to retain large hip implants in older children because their nonpediatric colleagues, who presumably are faced with the removal from these children when they reach adulthood, recommend implant removal once they have served their purpose. The number of such cases and the role of early removal in improving the long-term outcome need further study.

KW - Adult reconstruction

KW - Children

KW - Implant

KW - Questionnaire

KW - Removal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748661272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748661272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.bpo.0000214924.02939.62

DO - 10.1097/01.bpo.0000214924.02939.62

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 510

EP - 519

JO - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

JF - Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

SN - 0271-6798

IS - 4

ER -