Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: A case report

Chris Harle, Alyson Listhaus, Constanza M. Covarrubias, Siegfried O.F. Schmidt, Sean Mackey, Peter J. Carek, Roger B. Fillingim, Robert W. Hurley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-79
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Workflow
Automation
Patient Rights
Technology
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Keywords

  • Clinical informatics
  • Electronic health record
  • Patient outcome assessment
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Primary care
  • Work flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record : A case report. / Harle, Chris; Listhaus, Alyson; Covarrubias, Constanza M.; Schmidt, Siegfried O.F.; Mackey, Sean; Carek, Peter J.; Fillingim, Roger B.; Hurley, Robert W.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 74-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harle, Chris ; Listhaus, Alyson ; Covarrubias, Constanza M. ; Schmidt, Siegfried O.F. ; Mackey, Sean ; Carek, Peter J. ; Fillingim, Roger B. ; Hurley, Robert W. / Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record : A case report. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2016 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 74-79.
@article{235cd5225f434eadb77770b85229779a,
title = "Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record: A case report",
abstract = "In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.",
keywords = "Clinical informatics, Electronic health record, Patient outcome assessment, Patient-reported outcomes, Primary care, Work flow",
author = "Chris Harle and Alyson Listhaus and Covarrubias, {Constanza M.} and Schmidt, {Siegfried O.F.} and Sean Mackey and Carek, {Peter J.} and Fillingim, {Roger B.} and Hurley, {Robert W.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocv085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "74--79",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Overcoming barriers to implementing patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record

T2 - A case report

AU - Harle, Chris

AU - Listhaus, Alyson

AU - Covarrubias, Constanza M.

AU - Schmidt, Siegfried O.F.

AU - Mackey, Sean

AU - Carek, Peter J.

AU - Fillingim, Roger B.

AU - Hurley, Robert W.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.

AB - In this case report, the authors describe the implementation of a system for collecting patient-reported outcomes and integrating results in an electronic health record. The objective was to identify lessons learned in overcoming barriers to collecting and integrating patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. The authors analyzed qualitative data in 42 documents collected from system development meetings, written feedback from users, and clinical observations with practice staff, providers, and patients. Guided by the Unified Theory on the Adoption and Use of Information Technology, 5 emergent themes were identified. Two barriers emerged: (i) uncertain clinical benefit and (ii) time, work flow, and effort constraints. Three facilitators emerged: (iii) process automation, (iv) usable system interfaces, and (v) collecting patient-reported outcomes for the right patient at the right time. For electronic health record-integrated patient-reported outcomes to succeed as useful clinical tools, system designers must ensure the clinical relevance of the information being collected while minimizing provider, staff, and patient burden.

KW - Clinical informatics

KW - Electronic health record

KW - Patient outcome assessment

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Primary care

KW - Work flow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959563290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959563290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocv085

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocv085

M3 - Article

C2 - 26159464

AN - SCOPUS:84959563290

VL - 23

SP - 74

EP - 79

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 1

ER -