Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children

Gregory D. Zimet, Rose M. Mays, Lynne A. Sturm, April A. Ravert, Susan M. Perkins, Beth E. Juliar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate parental attitudes about adolescent vaccination as a function of vaccine characteristics, including whether the vaccine prevented a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to explore possible sociodemographic predictors of acceptability of STI vaccines. Design: Participants were 278 parents who accompanied their children (69.1% female, aged 12-17 years) to appointments at medical clinics. By using computer-based questionnaires, parents rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Willingness by parents to vaccinate their adolescents under each vaccine scenario was assessed on a scale that ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each dimension to the ratings. Results: The mean vaccine scenario rating was 81.3. Sexually transmitted infection vaccines (mean, 81.3) were not rated differently than non-STI vaccines (mean, 80.0). Conjoint analysis indicated that severity of infection and vaccine efficacy had the strongest influence on ratings, followed by availability of behavioral prevention. Mode of transmission had a negligible effect on ratings. Child age (P=.08) and sex (P=.77), parent age (P=.32) and education (P=.34), insurance status (P=.08), and data collection site (P=.48) were not significantly associated with STI vaccine acceptability. Conclusions: Parents were accepting of the idea of vaccinating their adolescent children against STIs. The most salient issues were severity of infection and vaccine efficacy, not sexual transmissibility. Parents also favored vaccines for infections that had no method of behavioral prevention available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-137
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Volume159
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

Fingerprint

Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Vaccination
Vaccines
Parents
Infection
Insurance Coverage
Appointments and Schedules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children. / Zimet, Gregory D.; Mays, Rose M.; Sturm, Lynne A.; Ravert, April A.; Perkins, Susan M.; Juliar, Beth E.

In: Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Vol. 159, No. 2, 01.02.2005, p. 132-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc7395c6b1f948a6912c61fad105df8b,
title = "Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children",
abstract = "Objectives: To evaluate parental attitudes about adolescent vaccination as a function of vaccine characteristics, including whether the vaccine prevented a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to explore possible sociodemographic predictors of acceptability of STI vaccines. Design: Participants were 278 parents who accompanied their children (69.1{\%} female, aged 12-17 years) to appointments at medical clinics. By using computer-based questionnaires, parents rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50{\%}, 70{\%}, or 90{\%}), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Willingness by parents to vaccinate their adolescents under each vaccine scenario was assessed on a scale that ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each dimension to the ratings. Results: The mean vaccine scenario rating was 81.3. Sexually transmitted infection vaccines (mean, 81.3) were not rated differently than non-STI vaccines (mean, 80.0). Conjoint analysis indicated that severity of infection and vaccine efficacy had the strongest influence on ratings, followed by availability of behavioral prevention. Mode of transmission had a negligible effect on ratings. Child age (P=.08) and sex (P=.77), parent age (P=.32) and education (P=.34), insurance status (P=.08), and data collection site (P=.48) were not significantly associated with STI vaccine acceptability. Conclusions: Parents were accepting of the idea of vaccinating their adolescent children against STIs. The most salient issues were severity of infection and vaccine efficacy, not sexual transmissibility. Parents also favored vaccines for infections that had no method of behavioral prevention available.",
author = "Zimet, {Gregory D.} and Mays, {Rose M.} and Sturm, {Lynne A.} and Ravert, {April A.} and Perkins, {Susan M.} and Juliar, {Beth E.}",
year = "2005",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archpedi.159.2.132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "132--137",
journal = "JAMA Pediatrics",
issn = "2168-6203",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parental attitudes about sexually transmitted infection vaccination for their adolescent children

AU - Zimet, Gregory D.

AU - Mays, Rose M.

AU - Sturm, Lynne A.

AU - Ravert, April A.

AU - Perkins, Susan M.

AU - Juliar, Beth E.

PY - 2005/2/1

Y1 - 2005/2/1

N2 - Objectives: To evaluate parental attitudes about adolescent vaccination as a function of vaccine characteristics, including whether the vaccine prevented a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to explore possible sociodemographic predictors of acceptability of STI vaccines. Design: Participants were 278 parents who accompanied their children (69.1% female, aged 12-17 years) to appointments at medical clinics. By using computer-based questionnaires, parents rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Willingness by parents to vaccinate their adolescents under each vaccine scenario was assessed on a scale that ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each dimension to the ratings. Results: The mean vaccine scenario rating was 81.3. Sexually transmitted infection vaccines (mean, 81.3) were not rated differently than non-STI vaccines (mean, 80.0). Conjoint analysis indicated that severity of infection and vaccine efficacy had the strongest influence on ratings, followed by availability of behavioral prevention. Mode of transmission had a negligible effect on ratings. Child age (P=.08) and sex (P=.77), parent age (P=.32) and education (P=.34), insurance status (P=.08), and data collection site (P=.48) were not significantly associated with STI vaccine acceptability. Conclusions: Parents were accepting of the idea of vaccinating their adolescent children against STIs. The most salient issues were severity of infection and vaccine efficacy, not sexual transmissibility. Parents also favored vaccines for infections that had no method of behavioral prevention available.

AB - Objectives: To evaluate parental attitudes about adolescent vaccination as a function of vaccine characteristics, including whether the vaccine prevented a sexually transmitted infection (STI), and to explore possible sociodemographic predictors of acceptability of STI vaccines. Design: Participants were 278 parents who accompanied their children (69.1% female, aged 12-17 years) to appointments at medical clinics. By using computer-based questionnaires, parents rated 9 hypothetical vaccine scenarios, each of which was defined along 4 dimensions: mode of transmission (STI or non-STI), severity of infection (curable, chronic, or fatal), vaccine efficacy (50%, 70%, or 90%), and availability of behavioral methods for prevention (available or not available). Willingness by parents to vaccinate their adolescents under each vaccine scenario was assessed on a scale that ranged from 0 to 100. Conjoint analysis was used to determine the relative contribution of each dimension to the ratings. Results: The mean vaccine scenario rating was 81.3. Sexually transmitted infection vaccines (mean, 81.3) were not rated differently than non-STI vaccines (mean, 80.0). Conjoint analysis indicated that severity of infection and vaccine efficacy had the strongest influence on ratings, followed by availability of behavioral prevention. Mode of transmission had a negligible effect on ratings. Child age (P=.08) and sex (P=.77), parent age (P=.32) and education (P=.34), insurance status (P=.08), and data collection site (P=.48) were not significantly associated with STI vaccine acceptability. Conclusions: Parents were accepting of the idea of vaccinating their adolescent children against STIs. The most salient issues were severity of infection and vaccine efficacy, not sexual transmissibility. Parents also favored vaccines for infections that had no method of behavioral prevention available.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13244251140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13244251140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archpedi.159.2.132

DO - 10.1001/archpedi.159.2.132

M3 - Article

C2 - 15699306

AN - SCOPUS:13244251140

VL - 159

SP - 132

EP - 137

JO - JAMA Pediatrics

JF - JAMA Pediatrics

SN - 2168-6203

IS - 2

ER -