Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: The case of cystic fibrosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has been no rigorous evaluation of cystic fibrosis in this context. This paper will demonstrate cystic fibrosis to have unique properties that make it difficult to categorise among other diseases with the goal of promulgating a reproductive rule. Once this is established, it will be demonstrated that procreative rules that appeal to future health are inadequate in the era of advancing genetic knowledge. Utilising a specification of Joel Feinberg's 'open future' concept outlined by Matteo Mameli, it will offer an analysis of parental obligation that does not constrain parents of potential children with cystic fibrosis with a moral obligation not to bring them about.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)280-284
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume37
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Fingerprint

Moral Obligations
Cystic Fibrosis
obligation
Disease
parents
Parents
Ethicists
Prenatal Diagnosis
appeal
responsibility
Health
health
evaluation
Obligation
Moral Obligation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease : The case of cystic fibrosis. / Bosslet, Gabriel T.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 37, No. 5, 01.05.2011, p. 280-284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6bfca85971ae415a9af181d6e25c588f,
title = "Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease: The case of cystic fibrosis",
abstract = "The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has been no rigorous evaluation of cystic fibrosis in this context. This paper will demonstrate cystic fibrosis to have unique properties that make it difficult to categorise among other diseases with the goal of promulgating a reproductive rule. Once this is established, it will be demonstrated that procreative rules that appeal to future health are inadequate in the era of advancing genetic knowledge. Utilising a specification of Joel Feinberg's 'open future' concept outlined by Matteo Mameli, it will offer an analysis of parental obligation that does not constrain parents of potential children with cystic fibrosis with a moral obligation not to bring them about.",
author = "Bosslet, {Gabriel T.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2010.039230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "280--284",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parental procreative obligation and the categorisation of disease

T2 - The case of cystic fibrosis

AU - Bosslet, Gabriel T.

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has been no rigorous evaluation of cystic fibrosis in this context. This paper will demonstrate cystic fibrosis to have unique properties that make it difficult to categorise among other diseases with the goal of promulgating a reproductive rule. Once this is established, it will be demonstrated that procreative rules that appeal to future health are inadequate in the era of advancing genetic knowledge. Utilising a specification of Joel Feinberg's 'open future' concept outlined by Matteo Mameli, it will offer an analysis of parental obligation that does not constrain parents of potential children with cystic fibrosis with a moral obligation not to bring them about.

AB - The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has been no rigorous evaluation of cystic fibrosis in this context. This paper will demonstrate cystic fibrosis to have unique properties that make it difficult to categorise among other diseases with the goal of promulgating a reproductive rule. Once this is established, it will be demonstrated that procreative rules that appeal to future health are inadequate in the era of advancing genetic knowledge. Utilising a specification of Joel Feinberg's 'open future' concept outlined by Matteo Mameli, it will offer an analysis of parental obligation that does not constrain parents of potential children with cystic fibrosis with a moral obligation not to bring them about.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955475435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955475435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2010.039230

DO - 10.1136/jme.2010.039230

M3 - Article

C2 - 21292700

AN - SCOPUS:79955475435

VL - 37

SP - 280

EP - 284

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 5

ER -