Partial-mouth assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population of the United States

Jason D. Owens, Sherie A. Dowsett, George J. Eckert, Domenick Zero, Michael Kowolik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: It has been previously demonstrated, using periodontal data from an untreated population, that half-mouth assessment of six sites/tooth provides an appropriate alternative to whole-mouth assessment of periodontal disease status. Since periodontal destruction exhibits left-right symmetry, it was hypothesized that this would be equally applicable to a population with access to routine dental care. Methods: Adult subjects (N = 92) with a range of disease levels participated in the study. Probing depths (PDs) and recession (REC) were measured directly on six sites/tooth, on all teeth (excluding third molars), and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were derived. Partial-mouth assessments, i.e., assessment of limited sites and/or teeth, were compared with whole-mouth assessment as follows. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for mean PD, CAL, and REC, and for percentage of sites with disease above a specified threshold, to determine the agreement between the whole- and partial-mouth assessment. The sensitivity of partial-mouth assessment of disease prevalence also was determined. Results: For assessment of six sites per tooth in one upper and one lower quadrant, ICCs were consistently >0.80. Assessment of two sites per tooth or only Ramfjord teeth generally underestimated disease extent and severity, and prevalence, compared to half-mouth assessment. Conclusions: These results support the use of a half-mouth examination of six sites/tooth, to conserve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical information. Assessment of only two sites per tooth or the Ramfjord teeth was not suitable for evaluation of either disease extent and severity or prevalence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1206-1213
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume74
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2003

Fingerprint

Periodontal Diseases
Mouth
Tooth
Population
Mouth Diseases
Third Molar
Dental Care
Fatigue
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Diagnosis, oral/methods
  • Periodontal attachment
  • Periodontal diseases/diagnosis
  • Periodontal index
  • Periodontal pockets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Partial-mouth assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population of the United States. / Owens, Jason D.; Dowsett, Sherie A.; Eckert, George J.; Zero, Domenick; Kowolik, Michael.

In: Journal of Periodontology, Vol. 74, No. 8, 01.08.2003, p. 1206-1213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Owens, Jason D. ; Dowsett, Sherie A. ; Eckert, George J. ; Zero, Domenick ; Kowolik, Michael. / Partial-mouth assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population of the United States. In: Journal of Periodontology. 2003 ; Vol. 74, No. 8. pp. 1206-1213.
@article{6a5e3aec1c174177b3c09f52da56cba4,
title = "Partial-mouth assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population of the United States",
abstract = "Background: It has been previously demonstrated, using periodontal data from an untreated population, that half-mouth assessment of six sites/tooth provides an appropriate alternative to whole-mouth assessment of periodontal disease status. Since periodontal destruction exhibits left-right symmetry, it was hypothesized that this would be equally applicable to a population with access to routine dental care. Methods: Adult subjects (N = 92) with a range of disease levels participated in the study. Probing depths (PDs) and recession (REC) were measured directly on six sites/tooth, on all teeth (excluding third molars), and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were derived. Partial-mouth assessments, i.e., assessment of limited sites and/or teeth, were compared with whole-mouth assessment as follows. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for mean PD, CAL, and REC, and for percentage of sites with disease above a specified threshold, to determine the agreement between the whole- and partial-mouth assessment. The sensitivity of partial-mouth assessment of disease prevalence also was determined. Results: For assessment of six sites per tooth in one upper and one lower quadrant, ICCs were consistently >0.80. Assessment of two sites per tooth or only Ramfjord teeth generally underestimated disease extent and severity, and prevalence, compared to half-mouth assessment. Conclusions: These results support the use of a half-mouth examination of six sites/tooth, to conserve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical information. Assessment of only two sites per tooth or the Ramfjord teeth was not suitable for evaluation of either disease extent and severity or prevalence.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, oral/methods, Periodontal attachment, Periodontal diseases/diagnosis, Periodontal index, Periodontal pockets",
author = "Owens, {Jason D.} and Dowsett, {Sherie A.} and Eckert, {George J.} and Domenick Zero and Michael Kowolik",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1206--1213",
journal = "Journal of Periodontology",
issn = "0022-3492",
publisher = "American Academy of Periodontology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partial-mouth assessment of periodontal disease in an adult population of the United States

AU - Owens, Jason D.

AU - Dowsett, Sherie A.

AU - Eckert, George J.

AU - Zero, Domenick

AU - Kowolik, Michael

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - Background: It has been previously demonstrated, using periodontal data from an untreated population, that half-mouth assessment of six sites/tooth provides an appropriate alternative to whole-mouth assessment of periodontal disease status. Since periodontal destruction exhibits left-right symmetry, it was hypothesized that this would be equally applicable to a population with access to routine dental care. Methods: Adult subjects (N = 92) with a range of disease levels participated in the study. Probing depths (PDs) and recession (REC) were measured directly on six sites/tooth, on all teeth (excluding third molars), and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were derived. Partial-mouth assessments, i.e., assessment of limited sites and/or teeth, were compared with whole-mouth assessment as follows. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for mean PD, CAL, and REC, and for percentage of sites with disease above a specified threshold, to determine the agreement between the whole- and partial-mouth assessment. The sensitivity of partial-mouth assessment of disease prevalence also was determined. Results: For assessment of six sites per tooth in one upper and one lower quadrant, ICCs were consistently >0.80. Assessment of two sites per tooth or only Ramfjord teeth generally underestimated disease extent and severity, and prevalence, compared to half-mouth assessment. Conclusions: These results support the use of a half-mouth examination of six sites/tooth, to conserve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical information. Assessment of only two sites per tooth or the Ramfjord teeth was not suitable for evaluation of either disease extent and severity or prevalence.

AB - Background: It has been previously demonstrated, using periodontal data from an untreated population, that half-mouth assessment of six sites/tooth provides an appropriate alternative to whole-mouth assessment of periodontal disease status. Since periodontal destruction exhibits left-right symmetry, it was hypothesized that this would be equally applicable to a population with access to routine dental care. Methods: Adult subjects (N = 92) with a range of disease levels participated in the study. Probing depths (PDs) and recession (REC) were measured directly on six sites/tooth, on all teeth (excluding third molars), and clinical attachment levels (CALs) were derived. Partial-mouth assessments, i.e., assessment of limited sites and/or teeth, were compared with whole-mouth assessment as follows. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for mean PD, CAL, and REC, and for percentage of sites with disease above a specified threshold, to determine the agreement between the whole- and partial-mouth assessment. The sensitivity of partial-mouth assessment of disease prevalence also was determined. Results: For assessment of six sites per tooth in one upper and one lower quadrant, ICCs were consistently >0.80. Assessment of two sites per tooth or only Ramfjord teeth generally underestimated disease extent and severity, and prevalence, compared to half-mouth assessment. Conclusions: These results support the use of a half-mouth examination of six sites/tooth, to conserve time, limit cost, and reduce patient and examiner fatigue, while providing maximal clinical information. Assessment of only two sites per tooth or the Ramfjord teeth was not suitable for evaluation of either disease extent and severity or prevalence.

KW - Diagnosis, oral/methods

KW - Periodontal attachment

KW - Periodontal diseases/diagnosis

KW - Periodontal index

KW - Periodontal pockets

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141854083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141854083&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1206

DO - 10.1902/jop.2003.74.8.1206

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 1206

EP - 1213

JO - Journal of Periodontology

JF - Journal of Periodontology

SN - 0022-3492

IS - 8

ER -