Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials: Strategies for managing confounds

Linda Lindsey Davis, Michael Weaver, Barbara Habermann, Kathleen Buckwalter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials have been criticized for being more protocol than participant-centered, with concerns raised about higher subject attrition and limited generalizability under controlled conditions. Informal caregivers are similar to other participants in community-based trials: many are unlikely to remain in a trial without procedural adaptations to meet some of their needs. Purpose: This article discusses design and statistical strategies for tracking potential confounds associated with 3 participant-centered adaptations that may be made in community-based caregiver trials: tailoring multi-component interventions, using interpersonal contacts for participant maintenance, and non-blinding of trial participants. The intent of the article is to initiate dialogue on the seldom-discussed issue of participant-centered adaptations in community-based trials. Conclusions: Participant-centered adaptations may reduce subject attrition and enhance generalizability, but protocol adaptation can compromise trial integrity. The challenge for investigators is to develop scientifically sound methods for tracking / controlling potential confounds associated with each adaptation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-78
Number of pages6
JournalNursing Outlook
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Caregivers
Maintenance
Research Personnel
caN protocol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials : Strategies for managing confounds. / Davis, Linda Lindsey; Weaver, Michael; Habermann, Barbara; Buckwalter, Kathleen.

In: Nursing Outlook, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2005, p. 73-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Linda Lindsey ; Weaver, Michael ; Habermann, Barbara ; Buckwalter, Kathleen. / Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials : Strategies for managing confounds. In: Nursing Outlook. 2005 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 73-78.
@article{d424d72e8048451e816f10217b89d52b,
title = "Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials: Strategies for managing confounds",
abstract = "Background: Randomized trials have been criticized for being more protocol than participant-centered, with concerns raised about higher subject attrition and limited generalizability under controlled conditions. Informal caregivers are similar to other participants in community-based trials: many are unlikely to remain in a trial without procedural adaptations to meet some of their needs. Purpose: This article discusses design and statistical strategies for tracking potential confounds associated with 3 participant-centered adaptations that may be made in community-based caregiver trials: tailoring multi-component interventions, using interpersonal contacts for participant maintenance, and non-blinding of trial participants. The intent of the article is to initiate dialogue on the seldom-discussed issue of participant-centered adaptations in community-based trials. Conclusions: Participant-centered adaptations may reduce subject attrition and enhance generalizability, but protocol adaptation can compromise trial integrity. The challenge for investigators is to develop scientifically sound methods for tracking / controlling potential confounds associated with each adaptation.",
author = "Davis, {Linda Lindsey} and Michael Weaver and Barbara Habermann and Kathleen Buckwalter",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "73--78",
journal = "Nursing Outlook",
issn = "0029-6554",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials

T2 - Strategies for managing confounds

AU - Davis, Linda Lindsey

AU - Weaver, Michael

AU - Habermann, Barbara

AU - Buckwalter, Kathleen

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Background: Randomized trials have been criticized for being more protocol than participant-centered, with concerns raised about higher subject attrition and limited generalizability under controlled conditions. Informal caregivers are similar to other participants in community-based trials: many are unlikely to remain in a trial without procedural adaptations to meet some of their needs. Purpose: This article discusses design and statistical strategies for tracking potential confounds associated with 3 participant-centered adaptations that may be made in community-based caregiver trials: tailoring multi-component interventions, using interpersonal contacts for participant maintenance, and non-blinding of trial participants. The intent of the article is to initiate dialogue on the seldom-discussed issue of participant-centered adaptations in community-based trials. Conclusions: Participant-centered adaptations may reduce subject attrition and enhance generalizability, but protocol adaptation can compromise trial integrity. The challenge for investigators is to develop scientifically sound methods for tracking / controlling potential confounds associated with each adaptation.

AB - Background: Randomized trials have been criticized for being more protocol than participant-centered, with concerns raised about higher subject attrition and limited generalizability under controlled conditions. Informal caregivers are similar to other participants in community-based trials: many are unlikely to remain in a trial without procedural adaptations to meet some of their needs. Purpose: This article discusses design and statistical strategies for tracking potential confounds associated with 3 participant-centered adaptations that may be made in community-based caregiver trials: tailoring multi-component interventions, using interpersonal contacts for participant maintenance, and non-blinding of trial participants. The intent of the article is to initiate dialogue on the seldom-discussed issue of participant-centered adaptations in community-based trials. Conclusions: Participant-centered adaptations may reduce subject attrition and enhance generalizability, but protocol adaptation can compromise trial integrity. The challenge for investigators is to develop scientifically sound methods for tracking / controlling potential confounds associated with each adaptation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444500195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444500195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 15858525

AN - SCOPUS:20444500195

VL - 53

SP - 73

EP - 78

JO - Nursing Outlook

JF - Nursing Outlook

SN - 0029-6554

IS - 2

ER -