Pass/fail grading

A disadvantage for students applying for residency

John A. Dietrick, Michael T. Weaver, Hollis W. Merrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We polled general surgery residency program directors to determine whether the evaluation system used by a medical school-pass/fail versus competitive grading-has an effect on a student's ability to compete for a residency position in general surgery. A vast majority (89%) of respondents preferred to review medical student transcripts that use grades rather than pass/fail evaluations. In addition, 83% would prefer to evaluate their own students with a grading system rather than a pass/fail mark. Eighty-one percent of program directors believed that the medical student's ability to compete for a residency position was adversely influenced by the pass/fail method of evaluation. Since program directors appear to be biased in favor of an evaluation system that provides them with more objective data, we conclude that the use of the pass/fail grading system puts the medical student at a disadvantage in competing for general surgery residency positions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-66
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume162
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Medical Students
Students
Medical Schools

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Pass/fail grading : A disadvantage for students applying for residency. / Dietrick, John A.; Weaver, Michael T.; Merrick, Hollis W.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 162, No. 1, 1991, p. 63-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dietrick, John A. ; Weaver, Michael T. ; Merrick, Hollis W. / Pass/fail grading : A disadvantage for students applying for residency. In: American Journal of Surgery. 1991 ; Vol. 162, No. 1. pp. 63-66.
@article{973f51089b5a49a4bcd5641027199606,
title = "Pass/fail grading: A disadvantage for students applying for residency",
abstract = "We polled general surgery residency program directors to determine whether the evaluation system used by a medical school-pass/fail versus competitive grading-has an effect on a student's ability to compete for a residency position in general surgery. A vast majority (89{\%}) of respondents preferred to review medical student transcripts that use grades rather than pass/fail evaluations. In addition, 83{\%} would prefer to evaluate their own students with a grading system rather than a pass/fail mark. Eighty-one percent of program directors believed that the medical student's ability to compete for a residency position was adversely influenced by the pass/fail method of evaluation. Since program directors appear to be biased in favor of an evaluation system that provides them with more objective data, we conclude that the use of the pass/fail grading system puts the medical student at a disadvantage in competing for general surgery residency positions.",
author = "Dietrick, {John A.} and Weaver, {Michael T.} and Merrick, {Hollis W.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9610(91)90204-Q",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "63--66",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pass/fail grading

T2 - A disadvantage for students applying for residency

AU - Dietrick, John A.

AU - Weaver, Michael T.

AU - Merrick, Hollis W.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - We polled general surgery residency program directors to determine whether the evaluation system used by a medical school-pass/fail versus competitive grading-has an effect on a student's ability to compete for a residency position in general surgery. A vast majority (89%) of respondents preferred to review medical student transcripts that use grades rather than pass/fail evaluations. In addition, 83% would prefer to evaluate their own students with a grading system rather than a pass/fail mark. Eighty-one percent of program directors believed that the medical student's ability to compete for a residency position was adversely influenced by the pass/fail method of evaluation. Since program directors appear to be biased in favor of an evaluation system that provides them with more objective data, we conclude that the use of the pass/fail grading system puts the medical student at a disadvantage in competing for general surgery residency positions.

AB - We polled general surgery residency program directors to determine whether the evaluation system used by a medical school-pass/fail versus competitive grading-has an effect on a student's ability to compete for a residency position in general surgery. A vast majority (89%) of respondents preferred to review medical student transcripts that use grades rather than pass/fail evaluations. In addition, 83% would prefer to evaluate their own students with a grading system rather than a pass/fail mark. Eighty-one percent of program directors believed that the medical student's ability to compete for a residency position was adversely influenced by the pass/fail method of evaluation. Since program directors appear to be biased in favor of an evaluation system that provides them with more objective data, we conclude that the use of the pass/fail grading system puts the medical student at a disadvantage in competing for general surgery residency positions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025820891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025820891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90204-Q

DO - 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90204-Q

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 63

EP - 66

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -