Passive Digital Signature for Early Identification of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia

Malaz Boustani, Anthony J. Perkins, Rezaul Karim Khandker, Stephen Duong, Paul R. Dexter, Richard Lipton, Christopher M. Black, Vasu Chandrasekaran, Craig A. Solid, Patrick Monahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Developing scalable strategies for the early identification of Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) is important. We aimed to develop a passive digital signature for early identification of ADRD using electronic medical record (EMR) data. DESIGN: A case-control study. SETTING: The Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), a regional health information exchange in Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Patients identified with ADRD and matched controls. MEASUREMENTS: We used data from the INPC that includes structured and unstructured (visit notes, progress notes, medication notes) EMR data. Cases and controls were matched on age, race, and sex. The derivation sample consisted of 10 504 cases and 39 510 controls; the validation sample included 4500 cases and 16 952 controls. We constructed models to identify early 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year ADRD signatures. The analyses included 14 diagnostic risk variables and 10 drug classes in addition to new variables produced from unstructured data (eg, disorientation, confusion, wandering, apraxia, etc). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve was used to determine the best models. RESULTS: The AUROC curves for the validation samples for the 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year models that used only structured data were.689,.649, and.633, respectively. For the same samples and years, models that used both structured and unstructured data produced AUROC curves of.798,.748, and.704, respectively. Using a cutoff to maximize sensitivity and specificity, the 1- to 10-year, 3- to 10-year, and 5- to 10-year models had sensitivity that ranged from 51% to 62% and specificity that ranged from 80% to 89%. CONCLUSION: EMR-based data provide a targeted and scalable process for early identification of risk of ADRD as an alternative to traditional population screening. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:511–518, 2020.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)511-518
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • dementia
  • risk factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this