Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses

Michael C. Lipke, Sung P. Ha, Christopher D. Fischer, Jonas Rydberg, Stephen M. Bonsib, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Pathologic grade is an important prognostic factor for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The objective of this study was to determine if there is any association of radiologic characteristics with pathologic grade and type of small renal tumors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 500 patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria of solitary RCC <6 cm and adequate radiologic imaging available for review. The axial images with the largest area of tumor growing into the kidney were evaluated by a single radiologist to determine the percent of tumor that was exophytic. Results: Nine patients had tumors that were >67% exophytic, and 42 patients had tumors <67% exophytic. There is a statistically significant difference in the mean Fuhrman grade for these 2 groups (1.78 v 2.25, P < 0.01). The distribution of histologic subtype was as follows: 34 patients with clear cell, 15 with papillary, and one each with chromophobe and unclassified tumors. Papillary RCC comprised 78% (7 of 9) of tumors that were >67% exophytic and 15% (3 of 20) that were <33% exophytic. The relative risk of a >67% exophytic tumor being papillary v nonpapillary is 4.1. Conclusions: Exophytic renal tumors are more likely to be of lower pathologic grade and of the papillary RCC subtype when compared with endophytic renal tumors. A larger prospective study is required to confirm these findings and determine the implications. This information may be useful when small tumors are being considered for watchful waiting or ablative therapies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1489-1491
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume21
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Kidney
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Watchful Waiting
Prospective Studies
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Lipke, M. C., Ha, S. P., Fischer, C. D., Rydberg, J., Bonsib, S. M., & Sundaram, C. (2007). Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses. Journal of Endourology, 21(12), 1489-1491. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.9874

Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses. / Lipke, Michael C.; Ha, Sung P.; Fischer, Christopher D.; Rydberg, Jonas; Bonsib, Stephen M.; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 21, No. 12, 01.12.2007, p. 1489-1491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lipke, MC, Ha, SP, Fischer, CD, Rydberg, J, Bonsib, SM & Sundaram, C 2007, 'Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses', Journal of Endourology, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1489-1491. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.9874
Lipke MC, Ha SP, Fischer CD, Rydberg J, Bonsib SM, Sundaram C. Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses. Journal of Endourology. 2007 Dec 1;21(12):1489-1491. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.9874
Lipke, Michael C. ; Ha, Sung P. ; Fischer, Christopher D. ; Rydberg, Jonas ; Bonsib, Stephen M. ; Sundaram, Chandru. / Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses. In: Journal of Endourology. 2007 ; Vol. 21, No. 12. pp. 1489-1491.
@article{4c03164b7342403984c091cfe0571f75,
title = "Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses",
abstract = "Objective: Pathologic grade is an important prognostic factor for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The objective of this study was to determine if there is any association of radiologic characteristics with pathologic grade and type of small renal tumors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 500 patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria of solitary RCC <6 cm and adequate radiologic imaging available for review. The axial images with the largest area of tumor growing into the kidney were evaluated by a single radiologist to determine the percent of tumor that was exophytic. Results: Nine patients had tumors that were >67{\%} exophytic, and 42 patients had tumors <67{\%} exophytic. There is a statistically significant difference in the mean Fuhrman grade for these 2 groups (1.78 v 2.25, P < 0.01). The distribution of histologic subtype was as follows: 34 patients with clear cell, 15 with papillary, and one each with chromophobe and unclassified tumors. Papillary RCC comprised 78{\%} (7 of 9) of tumors that were >67{\%} exophytic and 15{\%} (3 of 20) that were <33{\%} exophytic. The relative risk of a >67{\%} exophytic tumor being papillary v nonpapillary is 4.1. Conclusions: Exophytic renal tumors are more likely to be of lower pathologic grade and of the papillary RCC subtype when compared with endophytic renal tumors. A larger prospective study is required to confirm these findings and determine the implications. This information may be useful when small tumors are being considered for watchful waiting or ablative therapies.",
author = "Lipke, {Michael C.} and Ha, {Sung P.} and Fischer, {Christopher D.} and Jonas Rydberg and Bonsib, {Stephen M.} and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2007.9874",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1489--1491",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathologic characteristics of exophytic renal masses

AU - Lipke, Michael C.

AU - Ha, Sung P.

AU - Fischer, Christopher D.

AU - Rydberg, Jonas

AU - Bonsib, Stephen M.

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Objective: Pathologic grade is an important prognostic factor for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The objective of this study was to determine if there is any association of radiologic characteristics with pathologic grade and type of small renal tumors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 500 patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria of solitary RCC <6 cm and adequate radiologic imaging available for review. The axial images with the largest area of tumor growing into the kidney were evaluated by a single radiologist to determine the percent of tumor that was exophytic. Results: Nine patients had tumors that were >67% exophytic, and 42 patients had tumors <67% exophytic. There is a statistically significant difference in the mean Fuhrman grade for these 2 groups (1.78 v 2.25, P < 0.01). The distribution of histologic subtype was as follows: 34 patients with clear cell, 15 with papillary, and one each with chromophobe and unclassified tumors. Papillary RCC comprised 78% (7 of 9) of tumors that were >67% exophytic and 15% (3 of 20) that were <33% exophytic. The relative risk of a >67% exophytic tumor being papillary v nonpapillary is 4.1. Conclusions: Exophytic renal tumors are more likely to be of lower pathologic grade and of the papillary RCC subtype when compared with endophytic renal tumors. A larger prospective study is required to confirm these findings and determine the implications. This information may be useful when small tumors are being considered for watchful waiting or ablative therapies.

AB - Objective: Pathologic grade is an important prognostic factor for renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). The objective of this study was to determine if there is any association of radiologic characteristics with pathologic grade and type of small renal tumors. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 500 patients who underwent extirpative renal surgery. Fifty-one patients met the inclusion criteria of solitary RCC <6 cm and adequate radiologic imaging available for review. The axial images with the largest area of tumor growing into the kidney were evaluated by a single radiologist to determine the percent of tumor that was exophytic. Results: Nine patients had tumors that were >67% exophytic, and 42 patients had tumors <67% exophytic. There is a statistically significant difference in the mean Fuhrman grade for these 2 groups (1.78 v 2.25, P < 0.01). The distribution of histologic subtype was as follows: 34 patients with clear cell, 15 with papillary, and one each with chromophobe and unclassified tumors. Papillary RCC comprised 78% (7 of 9) of tumors that were >67% exophytic and 15% (3 of 20) that were <33% exophytic. The relative risk of a >67% exophytic tumor being papillary v nonpapillary is 4.1. Conclusions: Exophytic renal tumors are more likely to be of lower pathologic grade and of the papillary RCC subtype when compared with endophytic renal tumors. A larger prospective study is required to confirm these findings and determine the implications. This information may be useful when small tumors are being considered for watchful waiting or ablative therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38049141051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38049141051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2007.9874

DO - 10.1089/end.2007.9874

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 1489

EP - 1491

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 12

ER -