Patient and partner perspectives on patient-delivered partner screening: Acceptability, benefits, and barriers

Kimberly R. McBride, Richard C. Goldsworthy, J. Dennis Fortenberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

The study examined willingness to engage in patient-delivered partner screening (PDPS) and preferences for expedited partner services (EPS). Forty urban U.S. sexually transmitted infection (STI) clinic patients participated in individual mixed-methods interviews exploring EPS preferences and PDPS willingness. Most participants selected PDPS and PDPT together and uptake varied by patient-partner relationship closeness. For PDPS, several potentially important barriers and benefits were identified. Perceived benefits included improved sexual health for patients and their sexual partner(s) as well as convenience, privacy, and the potential to enhance trust between sexual partners. Perceived barriers included concerns about PDPS processes (e.g., time it would take to receive the result, risk of sample contamination), the accuracy of results, STI stigma and associated blame, lack of trust for a sexual partner, and the packaging/appearance of the screening kit. PDPS affords benefits and may overcome treatment barriers in some situations; however, it shares common PDPT barriers and has its own unique challenges. There are also concerns regarding how the offer of PDPS may interact with PDPT utilization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-637
Number of pages7
JournalAIDS patient care and STDs
Volume24
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Patient and partner perspectives on patient-delivered partner screening: Acceptability, benefits, and barriers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this