Patient-centered radiology: Where are we, where do we want to be, and how do we get there?

Jennifer L. Kemp, Mary C. Mahoney, Vincent Mathews, Max Wintermark, Judy Yee, Stephen D. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess RSNA members' general attitudes and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-topatient communication; (b) examine the members' barriers to communicating more directly with patients; and (c) explore their perceptions of how such barriers can be overcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey developed by the Steering Committee and the RSNA Department of Research. Participants were asked to identify aspects of patient-centered care important to their practice, report on their interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication. Statistical analyses were performed by using the x2 test and analysis of variance. Results: The response rate was 12% (n = 694, 109 invitations were undeliverable). Most respondents (89%, 611 of 684) agreed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important to how they practice. The majority (73%, 421 of 575) reported that time or workload frequently prevented them from communicating directly with patients. The majority (74%, 423 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation would help them communicate with patients more directly. Conclusion: Many radiologists support the concept of communicating more directly with patients but report they are constrained by time or workload. Changes to reimbursement schemes may help mitigate these barriers to one crucial aspect of patient-centered care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)601-608
Number of pages8
JournalRadiology
Volume285
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiology
Patient-Centered Care
North America
Workload
Communication
Postal Service
Analysis of Variance
Delivery of Health Care
Radiologists
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Patient-centered radiology : Where are we, where do we want to be, and how do we get there? / Kemp, Jennifer L.; Mahoney, Mary C.; Mathews, Vincent; Wintermark, Max; Yee, Judy; Brown, Stephen D.

In: Radiology, Vol. 285, No. 2, 01.11.2017, p. 601-608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kemp, Jennifer L. ; Mahoney, Mary C. ; Mathews, Vincent ; Wintermark, Max ; Yee, Judy ; Brown, Stephen D. / Patient-centered radiology : Where are we, where do we want to be, and how do we get there?. In: Radiology. 2017 ; Vol. 285, No. 2. pp. 601-608.
@article{c530e49fc5ff4ed999eafaaf3e581295,
title = "Patient-centered radiology: Where are we, where do we want to be, and how do we get there?",
abstract = "Purpose: The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess RSNA members' general attitudes and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-topatient communication; (b) examine the members' barriers to communicating more directly with patients; and (c) explore their perceptions of how such barriers can be overcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey developed by the Steering Committee and the RSNA Department of Research. Participants were asked to identify aspects of patient-centered care important to their practice, report on their interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication. Statistical analyses were performed by using the x2 test and analysis of variance. Results: The response rate was 12{\%} (n = 694, 109 invitations were undeliverable). Most respondents (89{\%}, 611 of 684) agreed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important to how they practice. The majority (73{\%}, 421 of 575) reported that time or workload frequently prevented them from communicating directly with patients. The majority (74{\%}, 423 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation would help them communicate with patients more directly. Conclusion: Many radiologists support the concept of communicating more directly with patients but report they are constrained by time or workload. Changes to reimbursement schemes may help mitigate these barriers to one crucial aspect of patient-centered care.",
author = "Kemp, {Jennifer L.} and Mahoney, {Mary C.} and Vincent Mathews and Max Wintermark and Judy Yee and Brown, {Stephen D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/radiol.2017162056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "285",
pages = "601--608",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-centered radiology

T2 - Where are we, where do we want to be, and how do we get there?

AU - Kemp, Jennifer L.

AU - Mahoney, Mary C.

AU - Mathews, Vincent

AU - Wintermark, Max

AU - Yee, Judy

AU - Brown, Stephen D.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Purpose: The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess RSNA members' general attitudes and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-topatient communication; (b) examine the members' barriers to communicating more directly with patients; and (c) explore their perceptions of how such barriers can be overcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey developed by the Steering Committee and the RSNA Department of Research. Participants were asked to identify aspects of patient-centered care important to their practice, report on their interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication. Statistical analyses were performed by using the x2 test and analysis of variance. Results: The response rate was 12% (n = 694, 109 invitations were undeliverable). Most respondents (89%, 611 of 684) agreed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important to how they practice. The majority (73%, 421 of 575) reported that time or workload frequently prevented them from communicating directly with patients. The majority (74%, 423 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation would help them communicate with patients more directly. Conclusion: Many radiologists support the concept of communicating more directly with patients but report they are constrained by time or workload. Changes to reimbursement schemes may help mitigate these barriers to one crucial aspect of patient-centered care.

AB - Purpose: The objectives of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Patient-Centered Radiology Steering Committee survey were to (a) assess RSNA members' general attitudes and experiences concerning patient-centered radiology, with specific attention paid to radiologist-topatient communication; (b) examine the members' barriers to communicating more directly with patients; and (c) explore their perceptions of how such barriers can be overcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 5999 radiologists were invited by e-mail to complete an anonymous electronic survey developed by the Steering Committee and the RSNA Department of Research. Participants were asked to identify aspects of patient-centered care important to their practice, report on their interactions with patients, and share their opinions on radiologist-patient communication. Statistical analyses were performed by using the x2 test and analysis of variance. Results: The response rate was 12% (n = 694, 109 invitations were undeliverable). Most respondents (89%, 611 of 684) agreed that promoting awareness of the role of radiology in patients' overall health care is important to how they practice. The majority (73%, 421 of 575) reported that time or workload frequently prevented them from communicating directly with patients. The majority (74%, 423 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation would help them communicate with patients more directly. Conclusion: Many radiologists support the concept of communicating more directly with patients but report they are constrained by time or workload. Changes to reimbursement schemes may help mitigate these barriers to one crucial aspect of patient-centered care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032174308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032174308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2017162056

DO - 10.1148/radiol.2017162056

M3 - Article

C2 - 28631981

AN - SCOPUS:85032174308

VL - 285

SP - 601

EP - 608

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -