Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T)

Laura Min Mercer, Paula Tanabe, Peter Pang, Michael A. Gisondi, D. Mark Courtney, Kirsten G. Engel, Sarah M. Donlan, James G. Adams, Gregory Makoul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Effective communication is an essential aspect of high-quality patient care and a core competency for physicians. To date, assessment of communication skills in team-based settings has not been well established. We sought to tailor a psychometrically validated instrument, the Communication Assessment Tool, for use in Team settings (CAT-T), and test the feasibility of collecting patient perspectives of communication with medical teams in the emergency department (ED). Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study in an academic, tertiary, urban, Level 1 trauma center using the CAT-T, a 15-item instrument. Items were answered via a 5-point scale, with 5 = excellent. All adult ED patients (≥18 y/o) were eligible if the following exclusion criteria did not apply: primary psychiatric issues, critically ill, physiologically unstable, non-English speaking, or under arrest. Results: 81 patients were enrolled (mean age: 44, S.D. = 17; 44% male). Highest ratings were for treating the patient with respect (69% excellent), paying attention to the patient (69% excellent), and showing care and concern (69% excellent). Lowest ratings were for greeting the patient appropriately (54%), encouraging the patient to ask questions (54%), showing interest in the patient's ideas about his or her health (53% excellent), and involving the patient in decisions as much as he or she wanted (53% excellent). Conclusion: Although this pilot study has several methodological limitations, it demonstrates a signal that patient assessment of communication with the medical team is feasible and offers important feedback. Results indicate the need to improve communication in the ED. Practice implications: In the ED, focusing on the medical team rather then individual caregivers may more accurately reflect patients' experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-223
Number of pages4
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume73
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communication
Hospital Emergency Service
Quality of Health Care
Trauma Centers
Critical Illness
Caregivers
Psychiatry
Patient Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Physicians
Health

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Communication skills
  • Emergency medicine
  • Medical team communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team : Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T). / Mercer, Laura Min; Tanabe, Paula; Pang, Peter; Gisondi, Michael A.; Courtney, D. Mark; Engel, Kirsten G.; Donlan, Sarah M.; Adams, James G.; Makoul, Gregory.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 73, No. 2, 11.2008, p. 220-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mercer, Laura Min ; Tanabe, Paula ; Pang, Peter ; Gisondi, Michael A. ; Courtney, D. Mark ; Engel, Kirsten G. ; Donlan, Sarah M. ; Adams, James G. ; Makoul, Gregory. / Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team : Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T). In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2008 ; Vol. 73, No. 2. pp. 220-223.
@article{3e9b232f766046ea88a84da7c16e9727,
title = "Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team: Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T)",
abstract = "Objective: Effective communication is an essential aspect of high-quality patient care and a core competency for physicians. To date, assessment of communication skills in team-based settings has not been well established. We sought to tailor a psychometrically validated instrument, the Communication Assessment Tool, for use in Team settings (CAT-T), and test the feasibility of collecting patient perspectives of communication with medical teams in the emergency department (ED). Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study in an academic, tertiary, urban, Level 1 trauma center using the CAT-T, a 15-item instrument. Items were answered via a 5-point scale, with 5 = excellent. All adult ED patients (≥18 y/o) were eligible if the following exclusion criteria did not apply: primary psychiatric issues, critically ill, physiologically unstable, non-English speaking, or under arrest. Results: 81 patients were enrolled (mean age: 44, S.D. = 17; 44{\%} male). Highest ratings were for treating the patient with respect (69{\%} excellent), paying attention to the patient (69{\%} excellent), and showing care and concern (69{\%} excellent). Lowest ratings were for greeting the patient appropriately (54{\%}), encouraging the patient to ask questions (54{\%}), showing interest in the patient's ideas about his or her health (53{\%} excellent), and involving the patient in decisions as much as he or she wanted (53{\%} excellent). Conclusion: Although this pilot study has several methodological limitations, it demonstrates a signal that patient assessment of communication with the medical team is feasible and offers important feedback. Results indicate the need to improve communication in the ED. Practice implications: In the ED, focusing on the medical team rather then individual caregivers may more accurately reflect patients' experience.",
keywords = "Assessment, Communication skills, Emergency medicine, Medical team communication",
author = "Mercer, {Laura Min} and Paula Tanabe and Peter Pang and Gisondi, {Michael A.} and Courtney, {D. Mark} and Engel, {Kirsten G.} and Donlan, {Sarah M.} and Adams, {James G.} and Gregory Makoul",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "220--223",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient perspectives on communication with the medical team

T2 - Pilot study using the communication assessment tool-team (CAT-T)

AU - Mercer, Laura Min

AU - Tanabe, Paula

AU - Pang, Peter

AU - Gisondi, Michael A.

AU - Courtney, D. Mark

AU - Engel, Kirsten G.

AU - Donlan, Sarah M.

AU - Adams, James G.

AU - Makoul, Gregory

PY - 2008/11

Y1 - 2008/11

N2 - Objective: Effective communication is an essential aspect of high-quality patient care and a core competency for physicians. To date, assessment of communication skills in team-based settings has not been well established. We sought to tailor a psychometrically validated instrument, the Communication Assessment Tool, for use in Team settings (CAT-T), and test the feasibility of collecting patient perspectives of communication with medical teams in the emergency department (ED). Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study in an academic, tertiary, urban, Level 1 trauma center using the CAT-T, a 15-item instrument. Items were answered via a 5-point scale, with 5 = excellent. All adult ED patients (≥18 y/o) were eligible if the following exclusion criteria did not apply: primary psychiatric issues, critically ill, physiologically unstable, non-English speaking, or under arrest. Results: 81 patients were enrolled (mean age: 44, S.D. = 17; 44% male). Highest ratings were for treating the patient with respect (69% excellent), paying attention to the patient (69% excellent), and showing care and concern (69% excellent). Lowest ratings were for greeting the patient appropriately (54%), encouraging the patient to ask questions (54%), showing interest in the patient's ideas about his or her health (53% excellent), and involving the patient in decisions as much as he or she wanted (53% excellent). Conclusion: Although this pilot study has several methodological limitations, it demonstrates a signal that patient assessment of communication with the medical team is feasible and offers important feedback. Results indicate the need to improve communication in the ED. Practice implications: In the ED, focusing on the medical team rather then individual caregivers may more accurately reflect patients' experience.

AB - Objective: Effective communication is an essential aspect of high-quality patient care and a core competency for physicians. To date, assessment of communication skills in team-based settings has not been well established. We sought to tailor a psychometrically validated instrument, the Communication Assessment Tool, for use in Team settings (CAT-T), and test the feasibility of collecting patient perspectives of communication with medical teams in the emergency department (ED). Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study in an academic, tertiary, urban, Level 1 trauma center using the CAT-T, a 15-item instrument. Items were answered via a 5-point scale, with 5 = excellent. All adult ED patients (≥18 y/o) were eligible if the following exclusion criteria did not apply: primary psychiatric issues, critically ill, physiologically unstable, non-English speaking, or under arrest. Results: 81 patients were enrolled (mean age: 44, S.D. = 17; 44% male). Highest ratings were for treating the patient with respect (69% excellent), paying attention to the patient (69% excellent), and showing care and concern (69% excellent). Lowest ratings were for greeting the patient appropriately (54%), encouraging the patient to ask questions (54%), showing interest in the patient's ideas about his or her health (53% excellent), and involving the patient in decisions as much as he or she wanted (53% excellent). Conclusion: Although this pilot study has several methodological limitations, it demonstrates a signal that patient assessment of communication with the medical team is feasible and offers important feedback. Results indicate the need to improve communication in the ED. Practice implications: In the ED, focusing on the medical team rather then individual caregivers may more accurately reflect patients' experience.

KW - Assessment

KW - Communication skills

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Medical team communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53049086666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53049086666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 18703306

AN - SCOPUS:53049086666

VL - 73

SP - 220

EP - 223

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -