Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records

Chris Harle, Elizabeth H. Golembiewski, Kiarash P. Rahmanian, Janice L. Krieger, Dorothy Hagmajer, Arch G. Mainous, Ray E. Moseley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient perceptions of using an interactive electronic consent (e-consent) application when deciding whether or not to grant broad consent for research use of their identifiable electronic health record (EHR) information. Materials and Methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted a series of 42 think-aloud interviews with 32 adults. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: We identified themes related to patient preferences, reservations, and mixed attitudes toward consenting electronically; low- and high-information-seeking behavior; and an emphasis on reassuring information, such as data protections and prohibitions against sharing data with pharmaceutical companies. Participants expressed interest in the types of information contained in their EHRs, safeguards protecting EHR data, and specifics on studies that might use their EHR data. Discussion: This study supports the potential value of interactive e-consent applications that allow patients to customize their consent experience. This study also highlights that some people have concerns about e-consent platforms and desire more detailed information about administrative processes and safeguards that protect EHR data used in research. Conclusion: This study contributes new insights on how e-consent applications could be designed to ensure that patients' information needs are met when seeking consent for research use of health record information. Also, this study offers a potential electronic approach to meeting the new Common Rule requirement that consent documents contain a "concise and focused" presentation of key information followed by more details.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-368
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Electronic Health Records
Research
Information Seeking Behavior
Interviews
Consent Forms
Computer Security
Information Dissemination
Health
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • Broad consent
  • Common rule
  • e-consent
  • Electronic health record
  • Information systems design
  • Research informatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records. / Harle, Chris; Golembiewski, Elizabeth H.; Rahmanian, Kiarash P.; Krieger, Janice L.; Hagmajer, Dorothy; Mainous, Arch G.; Moseley, Ray E.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 360-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harle, Chris ; Golembiewski, Elizabeth H. ; Rahmanian, Kiarash P. ; Krieger, Janice L. ; Hagmajer, Dorothy ; Mainous, Arch G. ; Moseley, Ray E. / Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 360-368.
@article{758266455d624b8ba1358bced5382bad,
title = "Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient perceptions of using an interactive electronic consent (e-consent) application when deciding whether or not to grant broad consent for research use of their identifiable electronic health record (EHR) information. Materials and Methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted a series of 42 think-aloud interviews with 32 adults. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: We identified themes related to patient preferences, reservations, and mixed attitudes toward consenting electronically; low- and high-information-seeking behavior; and an emphasis on reassuring information, such as data protections and prohibitions against sharing data with pharmaceutical companies. Participants expressed interest in the types of information contained in their EHRs, safeguards protecting EHR data, and specifics on studies that might use their EHR data. Discussion: This study supports the potential value of interactive e-consent applications that allow patients to customize their consent experience. This study also highlights that some people have concerns about e-consent platforms and desire more detailed information about administrative processes and safeguards that protect EHR data used in research. Conclusion: This study contributes new insights on how e-consent applications could be designed to ensure that patients' information needs are met when seeking consent for research use of health record information. Also, this study offers a potential electronic approach to meeting the new Common Rule requirement that consent documents contain a {"}concise and focused{"} presentation of key information followed by more details.",
keywords = "Broad consent, Common rule, e-consent, Electronic health record, Information systems design, Research informatics",
author = "Chris Harle and Golembiewski, {Elizabeth H.} and Rahmanian, {Kiarash P.} and Krieger, {Janice L.} and Dorothy Hagmajer and Mainous, {Arch G.} and Moseley, {Ray E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocx145",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "360--368",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records

AU - Harle, Chris

AU - Golembiewski, Elizabeth H.

AU - Rahmanian, Kiarash P.

AU - Krieger, Janice L.

AU - Hagmajer, Dorothy

AU - Mainous, Arch G.

AU - Moseley, Ray E.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient perceptions of using an interactive electronic consent (e-consent) application when deciding whether or not to grant broad consent for research use of their identifiable electronic health record (EHR) information. Materials and Methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted a series of 42 think-aloud interviews with 32 adults. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: We identified themes related to patient preferences, reservations, and mixed attitudes toward consenting electronically; low- and high-information-seeking behavior; and an emphasis on reassuring information, such as data protections and prohibitions against sharing data with pharmaceutical companies. Participants expressed interest in the types of information contained in their EHRs, safeguards protecting EHR data, and specifics on studies that might use their EHR data. Discussion: This study supports the potential value of interactive e-consent applications that allow patients to customize their consent experience. This study also highlights that some people have concerns about e-consent platforms and desire more detailed information about administrative processes and safeguards that protect EHR data used in research. Conclusion: This study contributes new insights on how e-consent applications could be designed to ensure that patients' information needs are met when seeking consent for research use of health record information. Also, this study offers a potential electronic approach to meeting the new Common Rule requirement that consent documents contain a "concise and focused" presentation of key information followed by more details.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess patient perceptions of using an interactive electronic consent (e-consent) application when deciding whether or not to grant broad consent for research use of their identifiable electronic health record (EHR) information. Materials and Methods: For this qualitative study, we conducted a series of 42 think-aloud interviews with 32 adults. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: We identified themes related to patient preferences, reservations, and mixed attitudes toward consenting electronically; low- and high-information-seeking behavior; and an emphasis on reassuring information, such as data protections and prohibitions against sharing data with pharmaceutical companies. Participants expressed interest in the types of information contained in their EHRs, safeguards protecting EHR data, and specifics on studies that might use their EHR data. Discussion: This study supports the potential value of interactive e-consent applications that allow patients to customize their consent experience. This study also highlights that some people have concerns about e-consent platforms and desire more detailed information about administrative processes and safeguards that protect EHR data used in research. Conclusion: This study contributes new insights on how e-consent applications could be designed to ensure that patients' information needs are met when seeking consent for research use of health record information. Also, this study offers a potential electronic approach to meeting the new Common Rule requirement that consent documents contain a "concise and focused" presentation of key information followed by more details.

KW - Broad consent

KW - Common rule

KW - e-consent

KW - Electronic health record

KW - Information systems design

KW - Research informatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043316601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043316601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocx145

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocx145

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 360

EP - 368

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -