Patient recall of health care events and time to diagnose a suspected ovarian cancer

Lisa M. Hess, Michael W. Method, Frederick Stehman, Tess Weathers, Paridha Gupta, Jeanne Schilder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Patient recall is often used by clinicians to create a history of care leading to consultation with a gynecologic oncologist. Although patient recall may be an efficient method to explore the context of the patient's concerns, the accuracy of recall and its potential impact on care are unknown. This study sought to explore the consistency of patient recall compared with data found in health care records. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 105 eligible patients who were referred to a gynecologic oncologist for suspected ovarian cancer. Ninety-one of these patients were interviewed regarding symptoms, health care events, and the dates leading to diagnosis. The medical records of these patients from all previous providers were obtained and data were abstracted. The intraclass correlation coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC[3,1]) was used to examine correspondence between recall and medical record data. Results: There was low correspondence between patient recall and the medical record for time to diagnosis (ICC = 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.09 to 0.33; P =.12) and health care events (0.15; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.348; P =.008). Conclusions: There should be limited confidence in information obtained from patient recall given the inconsistency between recall and actual dates and events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-23
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Ovarian and other Gynecologic Cancer
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Ovarian Neoplasms
Delivery of Health Care
Medical Records
Confidence Intervals
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • Health care events
  • Intraclass correlation
  • Recollection
  • Reliability
  • Time to diagnosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Patient recall of health care events and time to diagnose a suspected ovarian cancer. / Hess, Lisa M.; Method, Michael W.; Stehman, Frederick; Weathers, Tess; Gupta, Paridha; Schilder, Jeanne.

In: Clinical Ovarian and other Gynecologic Cancer, Vol. 5, No. 1, 06.2012, p. 17-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f915c2ac42af479dbf5f5febc34d86c7,
title = "Patient recall of health care events and time to diagnose a suspected ovarian cancer",
abstract = "Introduction: Patient recall is often used by clinicians to create a history of care leading to consultation with a gynecologic oncologist. Although patient recall may be an efficient method to explore the context of the patient's concerns, the accuracy of recall and its potential impact on care are unknown. This study sought to explore the consistency of patient recall compared with data found in health care records. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 105 eligible patients who were referred to a gynecologic oncologist for suspected ovarian cancer. Ninety-one of these patients were interviewed regarding symptoms, health care events, and the dates leading to diagnosis. The medical records of these patients from all previous providers were obtained and data were abstracted. The intraclass correlation coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC[3,1]) was used to examine correspondence between recall and medical record data. Results: There was low correspondence between patient recall and the medical record for time to diagnosis (ICC = 0.12; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = -0.09 to 0.33; P =.12) and health care events (0.15; 95{\%} CI, -0.05 to 0.348; P =.008). Conclusions: There should be limited confidence in information obtained from patient recall given the inconsistency between recall and actual dates and events.",
keywords = "Health care events, Intraclass correlation, Recollection, Reliability, Time to diagnosis",
author = "Hess, {Lisa M.} and Method, {Michael W.} and Frederick Stehman and Tess Weathers and Paridha Gupta and Jeanne Schilder",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogc.2012.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "17--23",
journal = "Clinical Ovarian Cancer",
issn = "2212-9553",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient recall of health care events and time to diagnose a suspected ovarian cancer

AU - Hess, Lisa M.

AU - Method, Michael W.

AU - Stehman, Frederick

AU - Weathers, Tess

AU - Gupta, Paridha

AU - Schilder, Jeanne

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Introduction: Patient recall is often used by clinicians to create a history of care leading to consultation with a gynecologic oncologist. Although patient recall may be an efficient method to explore the context of the patient's concerns, the accuracy of recall and its potential impact on care are unknown. This study sought to explore the consistency of patient recall compared with data found in health care records. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 105 eligible patients who were referred to a gynecologic oncologist for suspected ovarian cancer. Ninety-one of these patients were interviewed regarding symptoms, health care events, and the dates leading to diagnosis. The medical records of these patients from all previous providers were obtained and data were abstracted. The intraclass correlation coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC[3,1]) was used to examine correspondence between recall and medical record data. Results: There was low correspondence between patient recall and the medical record for time to diagnosis (ICC = 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.09 to 0.33; P =.12) and health care events (0.15; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.348; P =.008). Conclusions: There should be limited confidence in information obtained from patient recall given the inconsistency between recall and actual dates and events.

AB - Introduction: Patient recall is often used by clinicians to create a history of care leading to consultation with a gynecologic oncologist. Although patient recall may be an efficient method to explore the context of the patient's concerns, the accuracy of recall and its potential impact on care are unknown. This study sought to explore the consistency of patient recall compared with data found in health care records. Patients and Methods: This study enrolled 105 eligible patients who were referred to a gynecologic oncologist for suspected ovarian cancer. Ninety-one of these patients were interviewed regarding symptoms, health care events, and the dates leading to diagnosis. The medical records of these patients from all previous providers were obtained and data were abstracted. The intraclass correlation coefficient (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC[3,1]) was used to examine correspondence between recall and medical record data. Results: There was low correspondence between patient recall and the medical record for time to diagnosis (ICC = 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.09 to 0.33; P =.12) and health care events (0.15; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.348; P =.008). Conclusions: There should be limited confidence in information obtained from patient recall given the inconsistency between recall and actual dates and events.

KW - Health care events

KW - Intraclass correlation

KW - Recollection

KW - Reliability

KW - Time to diagnosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868594855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868594855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogc.2012.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cogc.2012.04.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84868594855

VL - 5

SP - 17

EP - 23

JO - Clinical Ovarian Cancer

JF - Clinical Ovarian Cancer

SN - 2212-9553

IS - 1

ER -