Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care

Anton J. Kuzel, Steven H. Woolf, Valerie J. Gilchrist, John D. Engel, Thomas A. LaVeist, Charles Vincent, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

150 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recent attention given to medical errors, little is known about the kinds and importance of medical errors in primary care. The principal aims of this study were to develop patient-focused typologies of medical errors and harms in primary care settings and to discern which medical errors and harms seem to be the most important. METHODS: Thirty-eight in-depth anonymous interviews of adults from rural, suburban, and urban locales in Virginia and Ohio were conducted to solicit stories of preventable problems with primary health care that led to physical or psychological harm. Transcriptions were analyzed to identify, name, and organize the stories of errors and harms. RESULTS: The 38 narratives described 221 problematic incidents that predominantly involved breakdowns in the clinician-patient relationship (n = 82, 37%) and access to clinicians (n = 63, 29%). There were several reports of perceived racism. The incidents were linked to 170 reported harms, 70% of which were psychological, including anger, frustration, belittlement, and loss of relationship and trust in one's clinician. Physical harms accounted for 23% of the total and included pain, bruising, worsening medical condition, and adverse drug reactions. DISCUSSION: The errors reported by interviewed patients suggest that breakdowns in access to and relationships with clinicians may be more prominent medical errors than are technical errors in diagnosis and treatment. Patients were more likely to report being harmed psychologically and emotionally, suggesting that the current preoccupation of the patient safety movement with adverse drug events and surgical mishaps could overlook other patient priorities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-340
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

Medical Errors
Primary Health Care
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Psychology
Racism
Frustration
Anger
Patient Safety
Names
Interviews
Pain

Keywords

  • Harms
  • Medical errors
  • Patient perspective
  • Patient safety
  • Patient-centered care
  • Physician-patient relations
  • Qualitative research
  • Quality assurance, health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Kuzel, A. J., Woolf, S. H., Gilchrist, V. J., Engel, J. D., LaVeist, T. A., Vincent, C., & Frankel, R. (2004). Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(4), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.220

Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. / Kuzel, Anton J.; Woolf, Steven H.; Gilchrist, Valerie J.; Engel, John D.; LaVeist, Thomas A.; Vincent, Charles; Frankel, Richard.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 2, No. 4, 07.2004, p. 333-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kuzel, AJ, Woolf, SH, Gilchrist, VJ, Engel, JD, LaVeist, TA, Vincent, C & Frankel, R 2004, 'Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care', Annals of Family Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.220
Kuzel AJ, Woolf SH, Gilchrist VJ, Engel JD, LaVeist TA, Vincent C et al. Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. Annals of Family Medicine. 2004 Jul;2(4):333-340. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.220
Kuzel, Anton J. ; Woolf, Steven H. ; Gilchrist, Valerie J. ; Engel, John D. ; LaVeist, Thomas A. ; Vincent, Charles ; Frankel, Richard. / Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 333-340.
@article{bc307d11572b45248c539a44c3947dcd,
title = "Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Despite recent attention given to medical errors, little is known about the kinds and importance of medical errors in primary care. The principal aims of this study were to develop patient-focused typologies of medical errors and harms in primary care settings and to discern which medical errors and harms seem to be the most important. METHODS: Thirty-eight in-depth anonymous interviews of adults from rural, suburban, and urban locales in Virginia and Ohio were conducted to solicit stories of preventable problems with primary health care that led to physical or psychological harm. Transcriptions were analyzed to identify, name, and organize the stories of errors and harms. RESULTS: The 38 narratives described 221 problematic incidents that predominantly involved breakdowns in the clinician-patient relationship (n = 82, 37{\%}) and access to clinicians (n = 63, 29{\%}). There were several reports of perceived racism. The incidents were linked to 170 reported harms, 70{\%} of which were psychological, including anger, frustration, belittlement, and loss of relationship and trust in one's clinician. Physical harms accounted for 23{\%} of the total and included pain, bruising, worsening medical condition, and adverse drug reactions. DISCUSSION: The errors reported by interviewed patients suggest that breakdowns in access to and relationships with clinicians may be more prominent medical errors than are technical errors in diagnosis and treatment. Patients were more likely to report being harmed psychologically and emotionally, suggesting that the current preoccupation of the patient safety movement with adverse drug events and surgical mishaps could overlook other patient priorities.",
keywords = "Harms, Medical errors, Patient perspective, Patient safety, Patient-centered care, Physician-patient relations, Qualitative research, Quality assurance, health care",
author = "Kuzel, {Anton J.} and Woolf, {Steven H.} and Gilchrist, {Valerie J.} and Engel, {John D.} and LaVeist, {Thomas A.} and Charles Vincent and Richard Frankel",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1370/afm.220",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "333--340",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care

AU - Kuzel, Anton J.

AU - Woolf, Steven H.

AU - Gilchrist, Valerie J.

AU - Engel, John D.

AU - LaVeist, Thomas A.

AU - Vincent, Charles

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite recent attention given to medical errors, little is known about the kinds and importance of medical errors in primary care. The principal aims of this study were to develop patient-focused typologies of medical errors and harms in primary care settings and to discern which medical errors and harms seem to be the most important. METHODS: Thirty-eight in-depth anonymous interviews of adults from rural, suburban, and urban locales in Virginia and Ohio were conducted to solicit stories of preventable problems with primary health care that led to physical or psychological harm. Transcriptions were analyzed to identify, name, and organize the stories of errors and harms. RESULTS: The 38 narratives described 221 problematic incidents that predominantly involved breakdowns in the clinician-patient relationship (n = 82, 37%) and access to clinicians (n = 63, 29%). There were several reports of perceived racism. The incidents were linked to 170 reported harms, 70% of which were psychological, including anger, frustration, belittlement, and loss of relationship and trust in one's clinician. Physical harms accounted for 23% of the total and included pain, bruising, worsening medical condition, and adverse drug reactions. DISCUSSION: The errors reported by interviewed patients suggest that breakdowns in access to and relationships with clinicians may be more prominent medical errors than are technical errors in diagnosis and treatment. Patients were more likely to report being harmed psychologically and emotionally, suggesting that the current preoccupation of the patient safety movement with adverse drug events and surgical mishaps could overlook other patient priorities.

AB - BACKGROUND: Despite recent attention given to medical errors, little is known about the kinds and importance of medical errors in primary care. The principal aims of this study were to develop patient-focused typologies of medical errors and harms in primary care settings and to discern which medical errors and harms seem to be the most important. METHODS: Thirty-eight in-depth anonymous interviews of adults from rural, suburban, and urban locales in Virginia and Ohio were conducted to solicit stories of preventable problems with primary health care that led to physical or psychological harm. Transcriptions were analyzed to identify, name, and organize the stories of errors and harms. RESULTS: The 38 narratives described 221 problematic incidents that predominantly involved breakdowns in the clinician-patient relationship (n = 82, 37%) and access to clinicians (n = 63, 29%). There were several reports of perceived racism. The incidents were linked to 170 reported harms, 70% of which were psychological, including anger, frustration, belittlement, and loss of relationship and trust in one's clinician. Physical harms accounted for 23% of the total and included pain, bruising, worsening medical condition, and adverse drug reactions. DISCUSSION: The errors reported by interviewed patients suggest that breakdowns in access to and relationships with clinicians may be more prominent medical errors than are technical errors in diagnosis and treatment. Patients were more likely to report being harmed psychologically and emotionally, suggesting that the current preoccupation of the patient safety movement with adverse drug events and surgical mishaps could overlook other patient priorities.

KW - Harms

KW - Medical errors

KW - Patient perspective

KW - Patient safety

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Physician-patient relations

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Quality assurance, health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243174639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243174639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.220

DO - 10.1370/afm.220

M3 - Article

C2 - 15335132

AN - SCOPUS:4243174639

VL - 2

SP - 333

EP - 340

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 4

ER -