Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic

Michael D. Justiss, Malaz Boustani, Chris Fox, Cornelius Katona, Anthony J. Perkins, Patrick J. Healey, Greg Sachs, Siu Hui, Christopher Callahan, Hugh Hendrie, Emma Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a common and growing global public health problem. It leads to a high burden of suffering for society with an annual cost of $100 billion in the US and $10 billion in the UK. New strategies for both treatment and prevention of dementia are currently being developed. Implementation of these strategies will depend on the presence of a viable community or primary care based dementia screening and diagnosis program and patient acceptance of such a program. Objective: To compare the acceptance, perceived harms and perceived benefits of dementia screening among older adults receiving their care in two different primary health care systems in two countries. Design: A Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, USA and Kent, UK. Participants: A convenience sample of 245 older adults (Indianapolis, n=125; Kent, n=120). Outcomes Acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits as determined by a 52-item questionnaire (PRISM-PC questionnaire). Results: Four of the five domains were significantly different across the two samples. The UK sample had significantly higher dementia screening acceptance scores (p<0.05); higher perceived stigma scores (p<0.05); higher perceived loss of independence scores (p<0.01); and higher perceived suffering scores (p<0.01) than the US sample. Both groups perceived dementia screening as beneficial (p=0.218). After controlling for prior experience with dementia, acceptance and stigma were marginalized. Conclusions: Older adults attending primary care clinics across the Atlantic value dementia screening but have significant concerns about dementia screening although these concerns differed between the two countries. Low acceptance rates and high rates of perceived harms might be a significant barrier for the introduction of treatment or preventive methods for dementia in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-637
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dementia
Primary Health Care
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Perceived harms and benefits
  • Primary care
  • Screening acceptance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Justiss, M. D., Boustani, M., Fox, C., Katona, C., Perkins, A. J., Healey, P. J., ... Scott, E. (2009). Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 24(6), 632-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2173

Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic. / Justiss, Michael D.; Boustani, Malaz; Fox, Chris; Katona, Cornelius; Perkins, Anthony J.; Healey, Patrick J.; Sachs, Greg; Hui, Siu; Callahan, Christopher; Hendrie, Hugh; Scott, Emma.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2009, p. 632-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Justiss, Michael D. ; Boustani, Malaz ; Fox, Chris ; Katona, Cornelius ; Perkins, Anthony J. ; Healey, Patrick J. ; Sachs, Greg ; Hui, Siu ; Callahan, Christopher ; Hendrie, Hugh ; Scott, Emma. / Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic. In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 632-637.
@article{9f2680de2e234c548ff9618b54393797,
title = "Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic",
abstract = "Background: Dementia is a common and growing global public health problem. It leads to a high burden of suffering for society with an annual cost of $100 billion in the US and $10 billion in the UK. New strategies for both treatment and prevention of dementia are currently being developed. Implementation of these strategies will depend on the presence of a viable community or primary care based dementia screening and diagnosis program and patient acceptance of such a program. Objective: To compare the acceptance, perceived harms and perceived benefits of dementia screening among older adults receiving their care in two different primary health care systems in two countries. Design: A Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, USA and Kent, UK. Participants: A convenience sample of 245 older adults (Indianapolis, n=125; Kent, n=120). Outcomes Acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits as determined by a 52-item questionnaire (PRISM-PC questionnaire). Results: Four of the five domains were significantly different across the two samples. The UK sample had significantly higher dementia screening acceptance scores (p<0.05); higher perceived stigma scores (p<0.05); higher perceived loss of independence scores (p<0.01); and higher perceived suffering scores (p<0.01) than the US sample. Both groups perceived dementia screening as beneficial (p=0.218). After controlling for prior experience with dementia, acceptance and stigma were marginalized. Conclusions: Older adults attending primary care clinics across the Atlantic value dementia screening but have significant concerns about dementia screening although these concerns differed between the two countries. Low acceptance rates and high rates of perceived harms might be a significant barrier for the introduction of treatment or preventive methods for dementia in the future.",
keywords = "Dementia, Perceived harms and benefits, Primary care, Screening acceptance",
author = "Justiss, {Michael D.} and Malaz Boustani and Chris Fox and Cornelius Katona and Perkins, {Anthony J.} and Healey, {Patrick J.} and Greg Sachs and Siu Hui and Christopher Callahan and Hugh Hendrie and Emma Scott",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1002/gps.2173",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "632--637",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient's attitudes of dementia screening across the Atlantic

AU - Justiss, Michael D.

AU - Boustani, Malaz

AU - Fox, Chris

AU - Katona, Cornelius

AU - Perkins, Anthony J.

AU - Healey, Patrick J.

AU - Sachs, Greg

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Hendrie, Hugh

AU - Scott, Emma

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: Dementia is a common and growing global public health problem. It leads to a high burden of suffering for society with an annual cost of $100 billion in the US and $10 billion in the UK. New strategies for both treatment and prevention of dementia are currently being developed. Implementation of these strategies will depend on the presence of a viable community or primary care based dementia screening and diagnosis program and patient acceptance of such a program. Objective: To compare the acceptance, perceived harms and perceived benefits of dementia screening among older adults receiving their care in two different primary health care systems in two countries. Design: A Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, USA and Kent, UK. Participants: A convenience sample of 245 older adults (Indianapolis, n=125; Kent, n=120). Outcomes Acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits as determined by a 52-item questionnaire (PRISM-PC questionnaire). Results: Four of the five domains were significantly different across the two samples. The UK sample had significantly higher dementia screening acceptance scores (p<0.05); higher perceived stigma scores (p<0.05); higher perceived loss of independence scores (p<0.01); and higher perceived suffering scores (p<0.01) than the US sample. Both groups perceived dementia screening as beneficial (p=0.218). After controlling for prior experience with dementia, acceptance and stigma were marginalized. Conclusions: Older adults attending primary care clinics across the Atlantic value dementia screening but have significant concerns about dementia screening although these concerns differed between the two countries. Low acceptance rates and high rates of perceived harms might be a significant barrier for the introduction of treatment or preventive methods for dementia in the future.

AB - Background: Dementia is a common and growing global public health problem. It leads to a high burden of suffering for society with an annual cost of $100 billion in the US and $10 billion in the UK. New strategies for both treatment and prevention of dementia are currently being developed. Implementation of these strategies will depend on the presence of a viable community or primary care based dementia screening and diagnosis program and patient acceptance of such a program. Objective: To compare the acceptance, perceived harms and perceived benefits of dementia screening among older adults receiving their care in two different primary health care systems in two countries. Design: A Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary care clinics in Indianapolis, USA and Kent, UK. Participants: A convenience sample of 245 older adults (Indianapolis, n=125; Kent, n=120). Outcomes Acceptance of dementia screening and its perceived harms and benefits as determined by a 52-item questionnaire (PRISM-PC questionnaire). Results: Four of the five domains were significantly different across the two samples. The UK sample had significantly higher dementia screening acceptance scores (p<0.05); higher perceived stigma scores (p<0.05); higher perceived loss of independence scores (p<0.01); and higher perceived suffering scores (p<0.01) than the US sample. Both groups perceived dementia screening as beneficial (p=0.218). After controlling for prior experience with dementia, acceptance and stigma were marginalized. Conclusions: Older adults attending primary care clinics across the Atlantic value dementia screening but have significant concerns about dementia screening although these concerns differed between the two countries. Low acceptance rates and high rates of perceived harms might be a significant barrier for the introduction of treatment or preventive methods for dementia in the future.

KW - Dementia

KW - Perceived harms and benefits

KW - Primary care

KW - Screening acceptance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649386715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67649386715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.2173

DO - 10.1002/gps.2173

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 632

EP - 637

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 6

ER -