Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes

Ali Tafreshi, Lyne Racette, Robert N. Weinreb, Pamela A. Sample, Linda M. Zangwill, Felipe A. Medeiros, Christopher Bowd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) to that of standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 healthy recruits and 92 eyes of 54 glaucoma patients (based on optic disc appearance) from the University of California, San Diego, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were tested with pattern ERG for glaucoma detection (PERGLA; Lace Elettronica, Pisa, Italy), SAP, SWAP, and FDT within 9 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and compared for pattern ERG amplitude and SAP, SWAP, and FDT mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Sensitivities and specificities were compared and agreement among tests was described. Results: The area under the ROC curve for pattern ERG amplitude was 0.744 (95% confidence interval = 0.670, 0.818). The ROC curve area was 0.786 (0.720, 0.853) for SAP PSD, 0.732 (0.659, 0.806) for SWAP PSD, and 0.818 (0.758, 0.879) for FDT PSD. At 95% specificity, sensitivities of SAP and FDT PSD were significantly higher than that of pattern ERG amplitude; at 80% specificity, similar sensitivities were observed among tests. Agreement among tests was slight to moderate. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the pattern ERG amplitude was similar to that of SAP and SWAP, but somewhat worse than that of FDT. Nevertheless, the pattern ERG may hold some advantage over psychophysical testing because of its largely objective nature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-495
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Visual Field Tests
Glaucoma
Technology
ROC Curve
Optic Disk
Italy
Cross-Sectional Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Tafreshi, A., Racette, L., Weinreb, R. N., Sample, P. A., Zangwill, L. M., Medeiros, F. A., & Bowd, C. (2010). Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 149(3), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.027

Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes. / Tafreshi, Ali; Racette, Lyne; Weinreb, Robert N.; Sample, Pamela A.; Zangwill, Linda M.; Medeiros, Felipe A.; Bowd, Christopher.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 149, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 488-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tafreshi, Ali ; Racette, Lyne ; Weinreb, Robert N. ; Sample, Pamela A. ; Zangwill, Linda M. ; Medeiros, Felipe A. ; Bowd, Christopher. / Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010 ; Vol. 149, No. 3. pp. 488-495.
@article{f7b3993772ce48b681b12b932d6fbf04,
title = "Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) to that of standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 healthy recruits and 92 eyes of 54 glaucoma patients (based on optic disc appearance) from the University of California, San Diego, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were tested with pattern ERG for glaucoma detection (PERGLA; Lace Elettronica, Pisa, Italy), SAP, SWAP, and FDT within 9 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and compared for pattern ERG amplitude and SAP, SWAP, and FDT mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Sensitivities and specificities were compared and agreement among tests was described. Results: The area under the ROC curve for pattern ERG amplitude was 0.744 (95{\%} confidence interval = 0.670, 0.818). The ROC curve area was 0.786 (0.720, 0.853) for SAP PSD, 0.732 (0.659, 0.806) for SWAP PSD, and 0.818 (0.758, 0.879) for FDT PSD. At 95{\%} specificity, sensitivities of SAP and FDT PSD were significantly higher than that of pattern ERG amplitude; at 80{\%} specificity, similar sensitivities were observed among tests. Agreement among tests was slight to moderate. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the pattern ERG amplitude was similar to that of SAP and SWAP, but somewhat worse than that of FDT. Nevertheless, the pattern ERG may hold some advantage over psychophysical testing because of its largely objective nature.",
author = "Ali Tafreshi and Lyne Racette and Weinreb, {Robert N.} and Sample, {Pamela A.} and Zangwill, {Linda M.} and Medeiros, {Felipe A.} and Christopher Bowd",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "149",
pages = "488--495",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pattern Electroretinogram and Psychophysical Tests of Visual Function for Discriminating Between Healthy and Glaucoma Eyes

AU - Tafreshi, Ali

AU - Racette, Lyne

AU - Weinreb, Robert N.

AU - Sample, Pamela A.

AU - Zangwill, Linda M.

AU - Medeiros, Felipe A.

AU - Bowd, Christopher

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) to that of standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 healthy recruits and 92 eyes of 54 glaucoma patients (based on optic disc appearance) from the University of California, San Diego, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were tested with pattern ERG for glaucoma detection (PERGLA; Lace Elettronica, Pisa, Italy), SAP, SWAP, and FDT within 9 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and compared for pattern ERG amplitude and SAP, SWAP, and FDT mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Sensitivities and specificities were compared and agreement among tests was described. Results: The area under the ROC curve for pattern ERG amplitude was 0.744 (95% confidence interval = 0.670, 0.818). The ROC curve area was 0.786 (0.720, 0.853) for SAP PSD, 0.732 (0.659, 0.806) for SWAP PSD, and 0.818 (0.758, 0.879) for FDT PSD. At 95% specificity, sensitivities of SAP and FDT PSD were significantly higher than that of pattern ERG amplitude; at 80% specificity, similar sensitivities were observed among tests. Agreement among tests was slight to moderate. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the pattern ERG amplitude was similar to that of SAP and SWAP, but somewhat worse than that of FDT. Nevertheless, the pattern ERG may hold some advantage over psychophysical testing because of its largely objective nature.

AB - Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) to that of standard automated perimetry (SAP), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry for discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Eighty-three eyes of 42 healthy recruits and 92 eyes of 54 glaucoma patients (based on optic disc appearance) from the University of California, San Diego, Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study were tested with pattern ERG for glaucoma detection (PERGLA; Lace Elettronica, Pisa, Italy), SAP, SWAP, and FDT within 9 months. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and compared for pattern ERG amplitude and SAP, SWAP, and FDT mean deviation and pattern standard deviation (PSD). Sensitivities and specificities were compared and agreement among tests was described. Results: The area under the ROC curve for pattern ERG amplitude was 0.744 (95% confidence interval = 0.670, 0.818). The ROC curve area was 0.786 (0.720, 0.853) for SAP PSD, 0.732 (0.659, 0.806) for SWAP PSD, and 0.818 (0.758, 0.879) for FDT PSD. At 95% specificity, sensitivities of SAP and FDT PSD were significantly higher than that of pattern ERG amplitude; at 80% specificity, similar sensitivities were observed among tests. Agreement among tests was slight to moderate. Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the pattern ERG amplitude was similar to that of SAP and SWAP, but somewhat worse than that of FDT. Nevertheless, the pattern ERG may hold some advantage over psychophysical testing because of its largely objective nature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76749139953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76749139953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 20172073

AN - SCOPUS:76749139953

VL - 149

SP - 488

EP - 495

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 3

ER -