Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department

Jonathan Kirschner, Kaushal Shah, Daniel Runde, David Newman, Brandon Godbout, Dan Wiener, Jarone Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We sought to determine if CT utilization rates varied by characteristics of the physician. A chart review was performed at an urban academic emergency department (ED) to identify all the CT scans ordered and patients seen for subjects 21 years of age and older by physicians between January 2001 and December 2008. “Years of experience” was defined as years of practice after residency. Various experience cutoffs were determined a priori. Physicians were labeled “academic” if they had reduced clinical hours for academic duties and “clinical” if they were physicians without “protected time.” We categorized physicians as “high users” (top quartiles) and “low users” (bottom quartiles), and compared utilization rates from 2001 to 2003 to utilization rates from 2005 to 2007. There were 280 physician-years of practice, with an average experience of 6.1 years. When comparing groups of physicians with more or less than 3, 5, 10, and 15 years of experience, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of CT scans per 1,000 visits (p = 0.85; p = 0.21; p = 0.57; p = 0.08, respectively). Comparison between clinical and academic physicians yielded no differences (clinical = 98.4, academic = 104.2, p = 0.10). Low users ordered 78 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 76.6–78.5), as compared to the high users that ordered 135 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 131.8–139.0). We found that all of physicians stayed within their quartiles except one. While there was substantial variation among CT utilization rates by physicians at this urban emergency department, our data shows no differences between physicians with more or less clinical experience and no change in individual utilization patterns during the study period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)577-581
Number of pages5
JournalEmergency Radiology
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 9 2014

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Tomography
Physicians
Internship and Residency

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Emergency medicine
  • Utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department. / Kirschner, Jonathan; Shah, Kaushal; Runde, Daniel; Newman, David; Godbout, Brandon; Wiener, Dan; Lee, Jarone.

In: Emergency Radiology, Vol. 21, No. 6, 09.11.2014, p. 577-581.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kirschner, Jonathan ; Shah, Kaushal ; Runde, Daniel ; Newman, David ; Godbout, Brandon ; Wiener, Dan ; Lee, Jarone. / Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department. In: Emergency Radiology. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 577-581.
@article{de8a4b8f77fa47438ccbd9657d8a0820,
title = "Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department",
abstract = "We sought to determine if CT utilization rates varied by characteristics of the physician. A chart review was performed at an urban academic emergency department (ED) to identify all the CT scans ordered and patients seen for subjects 21 years of age and older by physicians between January 2001 and December 2008. “Years of experience” was defined as years of practice after residency. Various experience cutoffs were determined a priori. Physicians were labeled “academic” if they had reduced clinical hours for academic duties and “clinical” if they were physicians without “protected time.” We categorized physicians as “high users” (top quartiles) and “low users” (bottom quartiles), and compared utilization rates from 2001 to 2003 to utilization rates from 2005 to 2007. There were 280 physician-years of practice, with an average experience of 6.1 years. When comparing groups of physicians with more or less than 3, 5, 10, and 15 years of experience, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of CT scans per 1,000 visits (p = 0.85; p = 0.21; p = 0.57; p = 0.08, respectively). Comparison between clinical and academic physicians yielded no differences (clinical = 98.4, academic = 104.2, p = 0.10). Low users ordered 78 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 {\%} CI 76.6–78.5), as compared to the high users that ordered 135 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 {\%} CI 131.8–139.0). We found that all of physicians stayed within their quartiles except one. While there was substantial variation among CT utilization rates by physicians at this urban emergency department, our data shows no differences between physicians with more or less clinical experience and no change in individual utilization patterns during the study period.",
keywords = "Computed tomography, Emergency medicine, Utilization",
author = "Jonathan Kirschner and Kaushal Shah and Daniel Runde and David Newman and Brandon Godbout and Dan Wiener and Jarone Lee",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10140-014-1237-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "577--581",
journal = "Emergency Radiology",
issn = "1070-3004",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department

AU - Kirschner, Jonathan

AU - Shah, Kaushal

AU - Runde, Daniel

AU - Newman, David

AU - Godbout, Brandon

AU - Wiener, Dan

AU - Lee, Jarone

PY - 2014/11/9

Y1 - 2014/11/9

N2 - We sought to determine if CT utilization rates varied by characteristics of the physician. A chart review was performed at an urban academic emergency department (ED) to identify all the CT scans ordered and patients seen for subjects 21 years of age and older by physicians between January 2001 and December 2008. “Years of experience” was defined as years of practice after residency. Various experience cutoffs were determined a priori. Physicians were labeled “academic” if they had reduced clinical hours for academic duties and “clinical” if they were physicians without “protected time.” We categorized physicians as “high users” (top quartiles) and “low users” (bottom quartiles), and compared utilization rates from 2001 to 2003 to utilization rates from 2005 to 2007. There were 280 physician-years of practice, with an average experience of 6.1 years. When comparing groups of physicians with more or less than 3, 5, 10, and 15 years of experience, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of CT scans per 1,000 visits (p = 0.85; p = 0.21; p = 0.57; p = 0.08, respectively). Comparison between clinical and academic physicians yielded no differences (clinical = 98.4, academic = 104.2, p = 0.10). Low users ordered 78 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 76.6–78.5), as compared to the high users that ordered 135 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 131.8–139.0). We found that all of physicians stayed within their quartiles except one. While there was substantial variation among CT utilization rates by physicians at this urban emergency department, our data shows no differences between physicians with more or less clinical experience and no change in individual utilization patterns during the study period.

AB - We sought to determine if CT utilization rates varied by characteristics of the physician. A chart review was performed at an urban academic emergency department (ED) to identify all the CT scans ordered and patients seen for subjects 21 years of age and older by physicians between January 2001 and December 2008. “Years of experience” was defined as years of practice after residency. Various experience cutoffs were determined a priori. Physicians were labeled “academic” if they had reduced clinical hours for academic duties and “clinical” if they were physicians without “protected time.” We categorized physicians as “high users” (top quartiles) and “low users” (bottom quartiles), and compared utilization rates from 2001 to 2003 to utilization rates from 2005 to 2007. There were 280 physician-years of practice, with an average experience of 6.1 years. When comparing groups of physicians with more or less than 3, 5, 10, and 15 years of experience, there were no statistically significant differences between the number of CT scans per 1,000 visits (p = 0.85; p = 0.21; p = 0.57; p = 0.08, respectively). Comparison between clinical and academic physicians yielded no differences (clinical = 98.4, academic = 104.2, p = 0.10). Low users ordered 78 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 76.6–78.5), as compared to the high users that ordered 135 CT scans per 1,000 patient visits (95 % CI 131.8–139.0). We found that all of physicians stayed within their quartiles except one. While there was substantial variation among CT utilization rates by physicians at this urban emergency department, our data shows no differences between physicians with more or less clinical experience and no change in individual utilization patterns during the study period.

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Emergency medicine

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911971097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911971097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10140-014-1237-x

DO - 10.1007/s10140-014-1237-x

M3 - Article

C2 - 24838813

AN - SCOPUS:84911971097

VL - 21

SP - 577

EP - 581

JO - Emergency Radiology

JF - Emergency Radiology

SN - 1070-3004

IS - 6

ER -