Patterns of patient specific dosimetry in total body irradiation

Yuichi Akino, Kevin P. McMullen, Indra J. Das

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Total body irradiation (TBI) has been used for bone marrow transplant for hematologic and immune deficiency conditions. The goal of TBI is to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, with a generally accepted range of dose uniformity being within ±10 of the prescribed dose. The moving table technique for TBI could make dose uniform in whole body by adjusting couch speed. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate the actual dose by calculation and hence in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is routinely performed. Here, the authors present patterns of patient-specific IVD in 161 TBI patients treated at our institution. Methods: Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit (Model C9 Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit, Picker X-ray Corporation) with customized moving bed (SITI Industrial Products, Inc., Fishers, IN) were used for TBI treatment. During treatment, OneDoseTM (Sicel Technology, NC) Metal Oxide-silicon Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor detectors were placed at patient body surface; both entrance and exit side of the beam at patient head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee to estimate midplane dose. When large differences (>10) between the prescribed and measured dose were observed, dose delivery was corrected for subsequent fractions by the adjustment of couch speed andor bolus placement. Under IRB exempt status, the authors retrospectively analyzed the treatment records of 161 patients who received TBI treatment between 2006 and 2011. Results: Across the entire cohort, the median ± SD (range) percent variance between calculated and measured dose for head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee was -2.3 ± 10.2 (-66.2 to 35.3), 1.1 ± 11.5 (-62.2 to 40.3), -1.9 ± 9.5 (-66.4 to 46.6), -1.1 ± 7.2 (-35.2 to 42.9), and 3.4 ± 12.2 (-47.9 to 108.5), respectively. More than half of treatments were within ±10 of the prescribed dose for all anatomical regions. For 80 of treatments (10-90), dose at the umbilicus was within ±10. However, some large differences greater than 35 were also found at several points. For one case, the knee received double the prescribed dose. When the dose differences for multiple fractions were averaged, compliance (±10) between the prescription and measured dose was improved compared to the dose difference of the first single fraction, for example, as at umbilicus, which improved from 83.9 to 98.5. Conclusions: Actual dose measurement analysis of TBI patients revealed a potentially wide variance from the calculated dose. Based from their IVD method for TBI using Cobalt-60 irradiator and moving table, ±10 over entire body is hard to achieve. However, it can be significantly improved with immediate feedback after the first fraction prior to subsequent treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number041719
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Whole-Body Irradiation
Umbilicus
Cobalt
Knee
Mediastinum
Therapeutics
Neck
Head
Semiconductors
Research Ethics Committees
Silicon
Oxides
Compliance
Prescriptions
Bone Marrow
Metals
X-Rays
Technology
Transplants

Keywords

  • in vivo dosimetry
  • total body irradiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Patterns of patient specific dosimetry in total body irradiation. / Akino, Yuichi; McMullen, Kevin P.; Das, Indra J.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 4, 041719, 04.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akino, Yuichi ; McMullen, Kevin P. ; Das, Indra J. / Patterns of patient specific dosimetry in total body irradiation. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 4.
@article{bc0d273c1828465ab3b3f928f8129d75,
title = "Patterns of patient specific dosimetry in total body irradiation",
abstract = "Purpose: Total body irradiation (TBI) has been used for bone marrow transplant for hematologic and immune deficiency conditions. The goal of TBI is to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, with a generally accepted range of dose uniformity being within ±10 of the prescribed dose. The moving table technique for TBI could make dose uniform in whole body by adjusting couch speed. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate the actual dose by calculation and hence in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is routinely performed. Here, the authors present patterns of patient-specific IVD in 161 TBI patients treated at our institution. Methods: Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit (Model C9 Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit, Picker X-ray Corporation) with customized moving bed (SITI Industrial Products, Inc., Fishers, IN) were used for TBI treatment. During treatment, OneDoseTM (Sicel Technology, NC) Metal Oxide-silicon Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor detectors were placed at patient body surface; both entrance and exit side of the beam at patient head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee to estimate midplane dose. When large differences (>10) between the prescribed and measured dose were observed, dose delivery was corrected for subsequent fractions by the adjustment of couch speed andor bolus placement. Under IRB exempt status, the authors retrospectively analyzed the treatment records of 161 patients who received TBI treatment between 2006 and 2011. Results: Across the entire cohort, the median ± SD (range) percent variance between calculated and measured dose for head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee was -2.3 ± 10.2 (-66.2 to 35.3), 1.1 ± 11.5 (-62.2 to 40.3), -1.9 ± 9.5 (-66.4 to 46.6), -1.1 ± 7.2 (-35.2 to 42.9), and 3.4 ± 12.2 (-47.9 to 108.5), respectively. More than half of treatments were within ±10 of the prescribed dose for all anatomical regions. For 80 of treatments (10-90), dose at the umbilicus was within ±10. However, some large differences greater than 35 were also found at several points. For one case, the knee received double the prescribed dose. When the dose differences for multiple fractions were averaged, compliance (±10) between the prescription and measured dose was improved compared to the dose difference of the first single fraction, for example, as at umbilicus, which improved from 83.9 to 98.5. Conclusions: Actual dose measurement analysis of TBI patients revealed a potentially wide variance from the calculated dose. Based from their IVD method for TBI using Cobalt-60 irradiator and moving table, ±10 over entire body is hard to achieve. However, it can be significantly improved with immediate feedback after the first fraction prior to subsequent treatments.",
keywords = "in vivo dosimetry, total body irradiation",
author = "Yuichi Akino and McMullen, {Kevin P.} and Das, {Indra J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1118/1.4795335",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of patient specific dosimetry in total body irradiation

AU - Akino, Yuichi

AU - McMullen, Kevin P.

AU - Das, Indra J.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Purpose: Total body irradiation (TBI) has been used for bone marrow transplant for hematologic and immune deficiency conditions. The goal of TBI is to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, with a generally accepted range of dose uniformity being within ±10 of the prescribed dose. The moving table technique for TBI could make dose uniform in whole body by adjusting couch speed. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate the actual dose by calculation and hence in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is routinely performed. Here, the authors present patterns of patient-specific IVD in 161 TBI patients treated at our institution. Methods: Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit (Model C9 Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit, Picker X-ray Corporation) with customized moving bed (SITI Industrial Products, Inc., Fishers, IN) were used for TBI treatment. During treatment, OneDoseTM (Sicel Technology, NC) Metal Oxide-silicon Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor detectors were placed at patient body surface; both entrance and exit side of the beam at patient head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee to estimate midplane dose. When large differences (>10) between the prescribed and measured dose were observed, dose delivery was corrected for subsequent fractions by the adjustment of couch speed andor bolus placement. Under IRB exempt status, the authors retrospectively analyzed the treatment records of 161 patients who received TBI treatment between 2006 and 2011. Results: Across the entire cohort, the median ± SD (range) percent variance between calculated and measured dose for head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee was -2.3 ± 10.2 (-66.2 to 35.3), 1.1 ± 11.5 (-62.2 to 40.3), -1.9 ± 9.5 (-66.4 to 46.6), -1.1 ± 7.2 (-35.2 to 42.9), and 3.4 ± 12.2 (-47.9 to 108.5), respectively. More than half of treatments were within ±10 of the prescribed dose for all anatomical regions. For 80 of treatments (10-90), dose at the umbilicus was within ±10. However, some large differences greater than 35 were also found at several points. For one case, the knee received double the prescribed dose. When the dose differences for multiple fractions were averaged, compliance (±10) between the prescription and measured dose was improved compared to the dose difference of the first single fraction, for example, as at umbilicus, which improved from 83.9 to 98.5. Conclusions: Actual dose measurement analysis of TBI patients revealed a potentially wide variance from the calculated dose. Based from their IVD method for TBI using Cobalt-60 irradiator and moving table, ±10 over entire body is hard to achieve. However, it can be significantly improved with immediate feedback after the first fraction prior to subsequent treatments.

AB - Purpose: Total body irradiation (TBI) has been used for bone marrow transplant for hematologic and immune deficiency conditions. The goal of TBI is to deliver a homogeneous dose to the entire body, with a generally accepted range of dose uniformity being within ±10 of the prescribed dose. The moving table technique for TBI could make dose uniform in whole body by adjusting couch speed. However, it is difficult to accurately estimate the actual dose by calculation and hence in vivo dosimetry (IVD) is routinely performed. Here, the authors present patterns of patient-specific IVD in 161 TBI patients treated at our institution. Methods: Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit (Model C9 Cobalt-60 teletherapy unit, Picker X-ray Corporation) with customized moving bed (SITI Industrial Products, Inc., Fishers, IN) were used for TBI treatment. During treatment, OneDoseTM (Sicel Technology, NC) Metal Oxide-silicon Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor detectors were placed at patient body surface; both entrance and exit side of the beam at patient head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee to estimate midplane dose. When large differences (>10) between the prescribed and measured dose were observed, dose delivery was corrected for subsequent fractions by the adjustment of couch speed andor bolus placement. Under IRB exempt status, the authors retrospectively analyzed the treatment records of 161 patients who received TBI treatment between 2006 and 2011. Results: Across the entire cohort, the median ± SD (range) percent variance between calculated and measured dose for head, neck, mediastinum, umbilicus, and knee was -2.3 ± 10.2 (-66.2 to 35.3), 1.1 ± 11.5 (-62.2 to 40.3), -1.9 ± 9.5 (-66.4 to 46.6), -1.1 ± 7.2 (-35.2 to 42.9), and 3.4 ± 12.2 (-47.9 to 108.5), respectively. More than half of treatments were within ±10 of the prescribed dose for all anatomical regions. For 80 of treatments (10-90), dose at the umbilicus was within ±10. However, some large differences greater than 35 were also found at several points. For one case, the knee received double the prescribed dose. When the dose differences for multiple fractions were averaged, compliance (±10) between the prescription and measured dose was improved compared to the dose difference of the first single fraction, for example, as at umbilicus, which improved from 83.9 to 98.5. Conclusions: Actual dose measurement analysis of TBI patients revealed a potentially wide variance from the calculated dose. Based from their IVD method for TBI using Cobalt-60 irradiator and moving table, ±10 over entire body is hard to achieve. However, it can be significantly improved with immediate feedback after the first fraction prior to subsequent treatments.

KW - in vivo dosimetry

KW - total body irradiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876182191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876182191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4795335

DO - 10.1118/1.4795335

M3 - Article

C2 - 23556889

AN - SCOPUS:84876182191

VL - 40

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 4

M1 - 041719

ER -