Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes

A qualitative study

Kathleen Abrahamson, Edward Miech, Heather Wood Davila, Christine Mueller, Valerie Cooke, Gregory Arling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Health systems globally and within the USA have introduced nursing home pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes in response to the need for improved nursing home quality. Central to the challenge of administering effective P4P is the availability of accurate, timely and clinically appropriate data for decision making. We aimed to explore ways in which data were collected, thought about and used as a result of participation in a P4P programme. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 232 nursing home employees from within 70 nursing homes that participated in P4P-sponsored quality improvement (QI) projects. Interview data were analysed to identify themes surrounding collecting, thinking about and using data for QI decision making. Results: The term 'data' appeared 247 times in the interviews, and over 92% of these instances (228/247) were spontaneous references by nursing home staff. Overall, 34% of respondents (79/232) referred directly to 'data' in their interviews. Nursing home leadership more frequently discussed data use than direct care staff. Emergent themes included using data to identify a QI problem, gathering data in new ways at the local level, and measuring outcomes in response to P4P participation. Alterations in data use as a result of policy change were theoretically consistent with the revised version of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, which posits that successful implementation is a function of evidence, context and facilitation. Conclusions: Providing a reimbursement context that facilitates the collection and use of reliable local evidence may be an important consideration to others contemplating the adaptation of P4P policies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-317
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Incentive Reimbursement
Nursing Homes
Decision Making
Quality Improvement
Interviews
Health Services Research
Nursing Staff
Health Services
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes : A qualitative study. / Abrahamson, Kathleen; Miech, Edward; Davila, Heather Wood; Mueller, Christine; Cooke, Valerie; Arling, Gregory.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 311-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abrahamson, Kathleen ; Miech, Edward ; Davila, Heather Wood ; Mueller, Christine ; Cooke, Valerie ; Arling, Gregory. / Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes : A qualitative study. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 311-317.
@article{d9bd2149ef9e47bf891f2ef2c9147c54,
title = "Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Introduction: Health systems globally and within the USA have introduced nursing home pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes in response to the need for improved nursing home quality. Central to the challenge of administering effective P4P is the availability of accurate, timely and clinically appropriate data for decision making. We aimed to explore ways in which data were collected, thought about and used as a result of participation in a P4P programme. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 232 nursing home employees from within 70 nursing homes that participated in P4P-sponsored quality improvement (QI) projects. Interview data were analysed to identify themes surrounding collecting, thinking about and using data for QI decision making. Results: The term 'data' appeared 247 times in the interviews, and over 92{\%} of these instances (228/247) were spontaneous references by nursing home staff. Overall, 34{\%} of respondents (79/232) referred directly to 'data' in their interviews. Nursing home leadership more frequently discussed data use than direct care staff. Emergent themes included using data to identify a QI problem, gathering data in new ways at the local level, and measuring outcomes in response to P4P participation. Alterations in data use as a result of policy change were theoretically consistent with the revised version of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, which posits that successful implementation is a function of evidence, context and facilitation. Conclusions: Providing a reimbursement context that facilitates the collection and use of reliable local evidence may be an important consideration to others contemplating the adaptation of P4P policies.",
author = "Kathleen Abrahamson and Edward Miech and Davila, {Heather Wood} and Christine Mueller and Valerie Cooke and Gregory Arling",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "311--317",
journal = "BMJ Quality and Safety",
issn = "2044-5415",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Abrahamson, Kathleen

AU - Miech, Edward

AU - Davila, Heather Wood

AU - Mueller, Christine

AU - Cooke, Valerie

AU - Arling, Gregory

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Introduction: Health systems globally and within the USA have introduced nursing home pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes in response to the need for improved nursing home quality. Central to the challenge of administering effective P4P is the availability of accurate, timely and clinically appropriate data for decision making. We aimed to explore ways in which data were collected, thought about and used as a result of participation in a P4P programme. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 232 nursing home employees from within 70 nursing homes that participated in P4P-sponsored quality improvement (QI) projects. Interview data were analysed to identify themes surrounding collecting, thinking about and using data for QI decision making. Results: The term 'data' appeared 247 times in the interviews, and over 92% of these instances (228/247) were spontaneous references by nursing home staff. Overall, 34% of respondents (79/232) referred directly to 'data' in their interviews. Nursing home leadership more frequently discussed data use than direct care staff. Emergent themes included using data to identify a QI problem, gathering data in new ways at the local level, and measuring outcomes in response to P4P participation. Alterations in data use as a result of policy change were theoretically consistent with the revised version of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, which posits that successful implementation is a function of evidence, context and facilitation. Conclusions: Providing a reimbursement context that facilitates the collection and use of reliable local evidence may be an important consideration to others contemplating the adaptation of P4P policies.

AB - Introduction: Health systems globally and within the USA have introduced nursing home pay-for-performance (P4P) programmes in response to the need for improved nursing home quality. Central to the challenge of administering effective P4P is the availability of accurate, timely and clinically appropriate data for decision making. We aimed to explore ways in which data were collected, thought about and used as a result of participation in a P4P programme. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 232 nursing home employees from within 70 nursing homes that participated in P4P-sponsored quality improvement (QI) projects. Interview data were analysed to identify themes surrounding collecting, thinking about and using data for QI decision making. Results: The term 'data' appeared 247 times in the interviews, and over 92% of these instances (228/247) were spontaneous references by nursing home staff. Overall, 34% of respondents (79/232) referred directly to 'data' in their interviews. Nursing home leadership more frequently discussed data use than direct care staff. Emergent themes included using data to identify a QI problem, gathering data in new ways at the local level, and measuring outcomes in response to P4P participation. Alterations in data use as a result of policy change were theoretically consistent with the revised version of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, which posits that successful implementation is a function of evidence, context and facilitation. Conclusions: Providing a reimbursement context that facilitates the collection and use of reliable local evidence may be an important consideration to others contemplating the adaptation of P4P policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928946648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928946648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 311

EP - 317

JO - BMJ Quality and Safety

JF - BMJ Quality and Safety

SN - 2044-5415

IS - 5

ER -