Pectus excavatum repair: Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques

Kim A. Molik, Scott A. Engum, Frederick Rescorla, Karen W. West, L. R. Scherer, Jay L. Grosfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

190 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive pectus repair that helps avoid cartilage resection and osteotomy. This report compares outcomes in patients undergoing a standard pectus repair to patients with the Nuss procedure. Methods: One hundred three children (ages 5 to 20 years) with severe pectus excavatum underwent repair. Patients were evaluated for type of repair performed, associated anomalies, cardiopulmonary function, operating time, analgesia requirements, complications, length of hospital stay, hospital and operative charges, and cosmetic result. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There were 68 patients (average age, 12.6 years) in the standard group and 35, (average age, 9.5 years) in the Nuss group. Associated anomalies were found in 6 standard group and 2 Nuss group patients. Average operating time in Nuss was 3.3 hours and in open procedures, 4.7 hours. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (20%) standard repair patients and 15 (43%) after the Nuss. In the standard group, 14 patients received intrathecal and 3 received epidural analgesia, while 35 (52%) required an intravenous patient-controlled anesthetic device (PCA; average, 1.8 days). In the Nuss group, 25 patients (71%) received epidural anesthesia (average, 3 days), and 31 (89%) utilized PCA (average 3.8 days). Four (6%) standard patients and 8 Nuss patients (29%) required reoperation. Length of stay averaged 4.0 days (range 2 to 30) in the standard group and 4.8 days (range, 2 to 11) in the Nuss group. Average operating room charge was $8,325 in the standard group and $9,480 in the Nuss group. Average hospital charge was $4,137 for the standard patient and $4,044 for the Nuss group. Analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay were increased (P < .05). The complication rate and operative and hospital charges were similar between groups. Conclusions: Although the Nuss repair is associated with shorter operating time, smaller incisions, and less dissection, early results indicate few other advantages. Drawbacks of the Nuss procedure include high complication and reoperation rates and lack of efficacy in older teenagers and those with connective tissue disorders. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine final cosmetic and functional outcomes and define the overall risks and benefits of this procedure as compared with the standard technique.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)324-328
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Funnel Chest
Length of Stay
Hospital Charges
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
Reoperation
Cosmetics
Epidural Analgesia
Epidural Anesthesia
Operating Rooms
Nonparametric Statistics
Osteotomy
Connective Tissue
Analgesia
Cartilage
Analgesics
Anesthetics
Dissection

Keywords

  • Chest wall abnormality
  • Nuss procedure
  • Pectus excavatum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Pectus excavatum repair : Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. / Molik, Kim A.; Engum, Scott A.; Rescorla, Frederick; West, Karen W.; Scherer, L. R.; Grosfeld, Jay L.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2001, p. 324-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Molik, Kim A. ; Engum, Scott A. ; Rescorla, Frederick ; West, Karen W. ; Scherer, L. R. ; Grosfeld, Jay L. / Pectus excavatum repair : Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2001 ; Vol. 36, No. 2. pp. 324-328.
@article{eabea539e858472bacddee1d01201e24,
title = "Pectus excavatum repair: Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques",
abstract = "Background/Purpose: The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive pectus repair that helps avoid cartilage resection and osteotomy. This report compares outcomes in patients undergoing a standard pectus repair to patients with the Nuss procedure. Methods: One hundred three children (ages 5 to 20 years) with severe pectus excavatum underwent repair. Patients were evaluated for type of repair performed, associated anomalies, cardiopulmonary function, operating time, analgesia requirements, complications, length of hospital stay, hospital and operative charges, and cosmetic result. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There were 68 patients (average age, 12.6 years) in the standard group and 35, (average age, 9.5 years) in the Nuss group. Associated anomalies were found in 6 standard group and 2 Nuss group patients. Average operating time in Nuss was 3.3 hours and in open procedures, 4.7 hours. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (20{\%}) standard repair patients and 15 (43{\%}) after the Nuss. In the standard group, 14 patients received intrathecal and 3 received epidural analgesia, while 35 (52{\%}) required an intravenous patient-controlled anesthetic device (PCA; average, 1.8 days). In the Nuss group, 25 patients (71{\%}) received epidural anesthesia (average, 3 days), and 31 (89{\%}) utilized PCA (average 3.8 days). Four (6{\%}) standard patients and 8 Nuss patients (29{\%}) required reoperation. Length of stay averaged 4.0 days (range 2 to 30) in the standard group and 4.8 days (range, 2 to 11) in the Nuss group. Average operating room charge was $8,325 in the standard group and $9,480 in the Nuss group. Average hospital charge was $4,137 for the standard patient and $4,044 for the Nuss group. Analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay were increased (P < .05). The complication rate and operative and hospital charges were similar between groups. Conclusions: Although the Nuss repair is associated with shorter operating time, smaller incisions, and less dissection, early results indicate few other advantages. Drawbacks of the Nuss procedure include high complication and reoperation rates and lack of efficacy in older teenagers and those with connective tissue disorders. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine final cosmetic and functional outcomes and define the overall risks and benefits of this procedure as compared with the standard technique.",
keywords = "Chest wall abnormality, Nuss procedure, Pectus excavatum",
author = "Molik, {Kim A.} and Engum, {Scott A.} and Frederick Rescorla and West, {Karen W.} and Scherer, {L. R.} and Grosfeld, {Jay L.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "324--328",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pectus excavatum repair

T2 - Experience with standard and minimal invasive techniques

AU - Molik, Kim A.

AU - Engum, Scott A.

AU - Rescorla, Frederick

AU - West, Karen W.

AU - Scherer, L. R.

AU - Grosfeld, Jay L.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Background/Purpose: The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive pectus repair that helps avoid cartilage resection and osteotomy. This report compares outcomes in patients undergoing a standard pectus repair to patients with the Nuss procedure. Methods: One hundred three children (ages 5 to 20 years) with severe pectus excavatum underwent repair. Patients were evaluated for type of repair performed, associated anomalies, cardiopulmonary function, operating time, analgesia requirements, complications, length of hospital stay, hospital and operative charges, and cosmetic result. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There were 68 patients (average age, 12.6 years) in the standard group and 35, (average age, 9.5 years) in the Nuss group. Associated anomalies were found in 6 standard group and 2 Nuss group patients. Average operating time in Nuss was 3.3 hours and in open procedures, 4.7 hours. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (20%) standard repair patients and 15 (43%) after the Nuss. In the standard group, 14 patients received intrathecal and 3 received epidural analgesia, while 35 (52%) required an intravenous patient-controlled anesthetic device (PCA; average, 1.8 days). In the Nuss group, 25 patients (71%) received epidural anesthesia (average, 3 days), and 31 (89%) utilized PCA (average 3.8 days). Four (6%) standard patients and 8 Nuss patients (29%) required reoperation. Length of stay averaged 4.0 days (range 2 to 30) in the standard group and 4.8 days (range, 2 to 11) in the Nuss group. Average operating room charge was $8,325 in the standard group and $9,480 in the Nuss group. Average hospital charge was $4,137 for the standard patient and $4,044 for the Nuss group. Analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay were increased (P < .05). The complication rate and operative and hospital charges were similar between groups. Conclusions: Although the Nuss repair is associated with shorter operating time, smaller incisions, and less dissection, early results indicate few other advantages. Drawbacks of the Nuss procedure include high complication and reoperation rates and lack of efficacy in older teenagers and those with connective tissue disorders. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine final cosmetic and functional outcomes and define the overall risks and benefits of this procedure as compared with the standard technique.

AB - Background/Purpose: The Nuss procedure is a minimally invasive pectus repair that helps avoid cartilage resection and osteotomy. This report compares outcomes in patients undergoing a standard pectus repair to patients with the Nuss procedure. Methods: One hundred three children (ages 5 to 20 years) with severe pectus excavatum underwent repair. Patients were evaluated for type of repair performed, associated anomalies, cardiopulmonary function, operating time, analgesia requirements, complications, length of hospital stay, hospital and operative charges, and cosmetic result. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Results: There were 68 patients (average age, 12.6 years) in the standard group and 35, (average age, 9.5 years) in the Nuss group. Associated anomalies were found in 6 standard group and 2 Nuss group patients. Average operating time in Nuss was 3.3 hours and in open procedures, 4.7 hours. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 (20%) standard repair patients and 15 (43%) after the Nuss. In the standard group, 14 patients received intrathecal and 3 received epidural analgesia, while 35 (52%) required an intravenous patient-controlled anesthetic device (PCA; average, 1.8 days). In the Nuss group, 25 patients (71%) received epidural anesthesia (average, 3 days), and 31 (89%) utilized PCA (average 3.8 days). Four (6%) standard patients and 8 Nuss patients (29%) required reoperation. Length of stay averaged 4.0 days (range 2 to 30) in the standard group and 4.8 days (range, 2 to 11) in the Nuss group. Average operating room charge was $8,325 in the standard group and $9,480 in the Nuss group. Average hospital charge was $4,137 for the standard patient and $4,044 for the Nuss group. Analgesic requirements and length of hospital stay were increased (P < .05). The complication rate and operative and hospital charges were similar between groups. Conclusions: Although the Nuss repair is associated with shorter operating time, smaller incisions, and less dissection, early results indicate few other advantages. Drawbacks of the Nuss procedure include high complication and reoperation rates and lack of efficacy in older teenagers and those with connective tissue disorders. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to determine final cosmetic and functional outcomes and define the overall risks and benefits of this procedure as compared with the standard technique.

KW - Chest wall abnormality

KW - Nuss procedure

KW - Pectus excavatum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035155302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035155302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707

DO - 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20707

M3 - Article

C2 - 11172426

AN - SCOPUS:0035155302

VL - 36

SP - 324

EP - 328

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 2

ER -