Percentage ash content of nonhuman primate long limb bones

David Burr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trotter and Hixon and Vose and Roach presented conflicting data about percentage ash content of the long limb bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The suggestion of Trotter and Hixon that this discrepancy was due to methods of preparing the bone prior to ashing, rather than to species differences, was tested using data collected by Gong on the volumetric composition of nonhuman primate bone. Masses of the various chemical fractions of bone reported by Gong were used to compute ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight. Good agreement was found between ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and the data of Vose and Roach; good agreement was also found between ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight and the data of Trotter and Hixon. This suggests that the data of Vose and Roach conflict with those of Trotter and Hixon because Vose and Roach failed to defat the bones prior to ashing. No actual species differences exist in the ash content of bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The data of Trotter and Hixon are most likely a more adequate reflection of both the magnitude and the regional similarity of ash content in nonhuman primate bone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-364
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume51
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

limb bones
ash content
Primates
Extremities
Bone and Bones
bones
Weights and Measures
interspecific variation
Fats
lipids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Percentage ash content of nonhuman primate long limb bones. / Burr, David.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 1979, p. 361-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8075297872a24694892fcf770c21e26d,
title = "Percentage ash content of nonhuman primate long limb bones",
abstract = "Trotter and Hixon and Vose and Roach presented conflicting data about percentage ash content of the long limb bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The suggestion of Trotter and Hixon that this discrepancy was due to methods of preparing the bone prior to ashing, rather than to species differences, was tested using data collected by Gong on the volumetric composition of nonhuman primate bone. Masses of the various chemical fractions of bone reported by Gong were used to compute ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight. Good agreement was found between ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and the data of Vose and Roach; good agreement was also found between ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight and the data of Trotter and Hixon. This suggests that the data of Vose and Roach conflict with those of Trotter and Hixon because Vose and Roach failed to defat the bones prior to ashing. No actual species differences exist in the ash content of bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The data of Trotter and Hixon are most likely a more adequate reflection of both the magnitude and the regional similarity of ash content in nonhuman primate bone.",
author = "David Burr",
year = "1979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "361--364",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percentage ash content of nonhuman primate long limb bones

AU - Burr, David

PY - 1979

Y1 - 1979

N2 - Trotter and Hixon and Vose and Roach presented conflicting data about percentage ash content of the long limb bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The suggestion of Trotter and Hixon that this discrepancy was due to methods of preparing the bone prior to ashing, rather than to species differences, was tested using data collected by Gong on the volumetric composition of nonhuman primate bone. Masses of the various chemical fractions of bone reported by Gong were used to compute ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight. Good agreement was found between ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and the data of Vose and Roach; good agreement was also found between ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight and the data of Trotter and Hixon. This suggests that the data of Vose and Roach conflict with those of Trotter and Hixon because Vose and Roach failed to defat the bones prior to ashing. No actual species differences exist in the ash content of bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The data of Trotter and Hixon are most likely a more adequate reflection of both the magnitude and the regional similarity of ash content in nonhuman primate bone.

AB - Trotter and Hixon and Vose and Roach presented conflicting data about percentage ash content of the long limb bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The suggestion of Trotter and Hixon that this discrepancy was due to methods of preparing the bone prior to ashing, rather than to species differences, was tested using data collected by Gong on the volumetric composition of nonhuman primate bone. Masses of the various chemical fractions of bone reported by Gong were used to compute ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight. Good agreement was found between ash content as a percentage of total dry weight and the data of Vose and Roach; good agreement was also found between ash content as a percentage of fat-free dry weight and the data of Trotter and Hixon. This suggests that the data of Vose and Roach conflict with those of Trotter and Hixon because Vose and Roach failed to defat the bones prior to ashing. No actual species differences exist in the ash content of bones of M. mulatta and M. nemestrina. The data of Trotter and Hixon are most likely a more adequate reflection of both the magnitude and the regional similarity of ash content in nonhuman primate bone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018595203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018595203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 532822

AN - SCOPUS:0018595203

VL - 51

SP - 361

EP - 364

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 3

ER -