Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation

C. Sophia Rammell, Diana Van Lancker Sidtis, David Pisoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Formulaic expressions, including idioms and other fxed expressions, comprise a signifcant proportion of discourse. Although much has been written about this topic, controversy remains about their psychological status. An important claim about formulaic expressions, that they are known to native speakers, has seldom been directly demonstrated. Tis study tested the hypothesis that formulaic expressions are known and stored as whole unit mental representations by performing three perceptual experiments. Method: Listeners transcribed two kinds of spectrally-degraded spoken sentences, half formulaic, and half novel, newly created expressions, matched for grammar and length. Two familiarity ratings, usage and exposure, were obtained from listeners for each expression. Text frequency data for the stimuli and their constituent words were obtained using a spoken corpus. Results: Participants transcribed formulaic more successfully than literal utterances. Usage and familiarity ratings correlated with accuracy, but formulaic utterances with low ratings were also transcribed correctly. Phrase types differed signifcantly in text frequency, but word frequency counts did not differentiate the two kinds of expressions. Discussion: Tese studies provide new converging evidence that formulaic expressions are encoded and processed as whole units, supporting a dual-process model of language processing, which assumes that grammatical and formulaic expressions are differentially processed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-262
Number of pages29
JournalMental Lexicon
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Acoustics
acoustics
rating
listener
Population Groups
Language
Psychology
grammar
stimulus
discourse
experiment
language
evidence
Recognition (Psychology)
Formulaic Expressions
Degradation
Rating
Utterance
Familiarity
Listeners

Keywords

  • Corpus analysis
  • Dual-process model
  • Formulaic language
  • Speech perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation. / Sophia Rammell, C.; Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana; Pisoni, David.

In: Mental Lexicon, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 234-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sophia Rammell, C. ; Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana ; Pisoni, David. / Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation. In: Mental Lexicon. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 234-262.
@article{c88601b4507e48d0a8b500e7603c4d5e,
title = "Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation",
abstract = "Background: Formulaic expressions, including idioms and other fxed expressions, comprise a signifcant proportion of discourse. Although much has been written about this topic, controversy remains about their psychological status. An important claim about formulaic expressions, that they are known to native speakers, has seldom been directly demonstrated. Tis study tested the hypothesis that formulaic expressions are known and stored as whole unit mental representations by performing three perceptual experiments. Method: Listeners transcribed two kinds of spectrally-degraded spoken sentences, half formulaic, and half novel, newly created expressions, matched for grammar and length. Two familiarity ratings, usage and exposure, were obtained from listeners for each expression. Text frequency data for the stimuli and their constituent words were obtained using a spoken corpus. Results: Participants transcribed formulaic more successfully than literal utterances. Usage and familiarity ratings correlated with accuracy, but formulaic utterances with low ratings were also transcribed correctly. Phrase types differed signifcantly in text frequency, but word frequency counts did not differentiate the two kinds of expressions. Discussion: Tese studies provide new converging evidence that formulaic expressions are encoded and processed as whole units, supporting a dual-process model of language processing, which assumes that grammatical and formulaic expressions are differentially processed.",
keywords = "Corpus analysis, Dual-process model, Formulaic language, Speech perception",
author = "{Sophia Rammell}, C. and {Van Lancker Sidtis}, Diana and David Pisoni",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/ml.16019.ram",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "234--262",
journal = "The Mental Lexicon",
issn = "1871-1340",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation

AU - Sophia Rammell, C.

AU - Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana

AU - Pisoni, David

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Formulaic expressions, including idioms and other fxed expressions, comprise a signifcant proportion of discourse. Although much has been written about this topic, controversy remains about their psychological status. An important claim about formulaic expressions, that they are known to native speakers, has seldom been directly demonstrated. Tis study tested the hypothesis that formulaic expressions are known and stored as whole unit mental representations by performing three perceptual experiments. Method: Listeners transcribed two kinds of spectrally-degraded spoken sentences, half formulaic, and half novel, newly created expressions, matched for grammar and length. Two familiarity ratings, usage and exposure, were obtained from listeners for each expression. Text frequency data for the stimuli and their constituent words were obtained using a spoken corpus. Results: Participants transcribed formulaic more successfully than literal utterances. Usage and familiarity ratings correlated with accuracy, but formulaic utterances with low ratings were also transcribed correctly. Phrase types differed signifcantly in text frequency, but word frequency counts did not differentiate the two kinds of expressions. Discussion: Tese studies provide new converging evidence that formulaic expressions are encoded and processed as whole units, supporting a dual-process model of language processing, which assumes that grammatical and formulaic expressions are differentially processed.

AB - Background: Formulaic expressions, including idioms and other fxed expressions, comprise a signifcant proportion of discourse. Although much has been written about this topic, controversy remains about their psychological status. An important claim about formulaic expressions, that they are known to native speakers, has seldom been directly demonstrated. Tis study tested the hypothesis that formulaic expressions are known and stored as whole unit mental representations by performing three perceptual experiments. Method: Listeners transcribed two kinds of spectrally-degraded spoken sentences, half formulaic, and half novel, newly created expressions, matched for grammar and length. Two familiarity ratings, usage and exposure, were obtained from listeners for each expression. Text frequency data for the stimuli and their constituent words were obtained using a spoken corpus. Results: Participants transcribed formulaic more successfully than literal utterances. Usage and familiarity ratings correlated with accuracy, but formulaic utterances with low ratings were also transcribed correctly. Phrase types differed signifcantly in text frequency, but word frequency counts did not differentiate the two kinds of expressions. Discussion: Tese studies provide new converging evidence that formulaic expressions are encoded and processed as whole units, supporting a dual-process model of language processing, which assumes that grammatical and formulaic expressions are differentially processed.

KW - Corpus analysis

KW - Dual-process model

KW - Formulaic language

KW - Speech perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044097273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044097273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/ml.16019.ram

DO - 10.1075/ml.16019.ram

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044097273

VL - 12

SP - 234

EP - 262

JO - The Mental Lexicon

JF - The Mental Lexicon

SN - 1871-1340

IS - 2

ER -