Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children

superior to tubes

Nathan M. Novotny, Reid C. Vegeler, Francine D. Breckler, Frederick Rescorla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes vs PEG buttons. Primary PEG buttons offer an advantage of being a single-step low-profile enteral access device with potentially fewer complications. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing PEG tubes and buttons (January 2006-August 2007) was performed. Power analysis demonstrated that 105 patients in each group were needed. Patient characteristics were collected in each group and evaluated by χ2 and t tests. P values of less than .05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 223 children having undergone PEG (110 tubes, 113 buttons) were identified. No differences were found in operative time, intraoperative complications, clogging, breakage, infections, emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions. However, children undergoing PEG button placement were more likely to spend only one night in the hospital vs PEG tube (60% vs 25%, respectively; P < .001). In addition, PEG buttons had fewer dislodgments (4 vs 15; P < .05). Conclusion: The PEG buttons are less likely to become dislodged than PEG tubes. Infection rates were not found to be different between groups. Children with PEG buttons were more likely to be discharged earlier than children with PEG tubes. Primary PEG buttons are clinically comparable to PEG tubes with less concern for dislodgements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1193-1196
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume44
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Gastrostomy
Patient Readmission
Intraoperative Complications
Operative Time
Infection
Small Intestine
Hospital Emergency Service

Keywords

  • Dislodgement
  • Length of stay
  • PEG
  • Wound infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children : superior to tubes. / Novotny, Nathan M.; Vegeler, Reid C.; Breckler, Francine D.; Rescorla, Frederick.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 44, No. 6, 06.2009, p. 1193-1196.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Novotny, Nathan M. ; Vegeler, Reid C. ; Breckler, Francine D. ; Rescorla, Frederick. / Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children : superior to tubes. In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2009 ; Vol. 44, No. 6. pp. 1193-1196.
@article{deccfea26eed43bab36a57d1c588f58e,
title = "Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children: superior to tubes",
abstract = "Background: There is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes vs PEG buttons. Primary PEG buttons offer an advantage of being a single-step low-profile enteral access device with potentially fewer complications. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing PEG tubes and buttons (January 2006-August 2007) was performed. Power analysis demonstrated that 105 patients in each group were needed. Patient characteristics were collected in each group and evaluated by χ2 and t tests. P values of less than .05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 223 children having undergone PEG (110 tubes, 113 buttons) were identified. No differences were found in operative time, intraoperative complications, clogging, breakage, infections, emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions. However, children undergoing PEG button placement were more likely to spend only one night in the hospital vs PEG tube (60{\%} vs 25{\%}, respectively; P < .001). In addition, PEG buttons had fewer dislodgments (4 vs 15; P < .05). Conclusion: The PEG buttons are less likely to become dislodged than PEG tubes. Infection rates were not found to be different between groups. Children with PEG buttons were more likely to be discharged earlier than children with PEG tubes. Primary PEG buttons are clinically comparable to PEG tubes with less concern for dislodgements.",
keywords = "Dislodgement, Length of stay, PEG, Wound infection",
author = "Novotny, {Nathan M.} and Vegeler, {Reid C.} and Breckler, {Francine D.} and Frederick Rescorla",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.024",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1193--1196",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy buttons in children

T2 - superior to tubes

AU - Novotny, Nathan M.

AU - Vegeler, Reid C.

AU - Breckler, Francine D.

AU - Rescorla, Frederick

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - Background: There is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes vs PEG buttons. Primary PEG buttons offer an advantage of being a single-step low-profile enteral access device with potentially fewer complications. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing PEG tubes and buttons (January 2006-August 2007) was performed. Power analysis demonstrated that 105 patients in each group were needed. Patient characteristics were collected in each group and evaluated by χ2 and t tests. P values of less than .05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 223 children having undergone PEG (110 tubes, 113 buttons) were identified. No differences were found in operative time, intraoperative complications, clogging, breakage, infections, emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions. However, children undergoing PEG button placement were more likely to spend only one night in the hospital vs PEG tube (60% vs 25%, respectively; P < .001). In addition, PEG buttons had fewer dislodgments (4 vs 15; P < .05). Conclusion: The PEG buttons are less likely to become dislodged than PEG tubes. Infection rates were not found to be different between groups. Children with PEG buttons were more likely to be discharged earlier than children with PEG tubes. Primary PEG buttons are clinically comparable to PEG tubes with less concern for dislodgements.

AB - Background: There is a paucity of literature comparing outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes vs PEG buttons. Primary PEG buttons offer an advantage of being a single-step low-profile enteral access device with potentially fewer complications. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing PEG tubes and buttons (January 2006-August 2007) was performed. Power analysis demonstrated that 105 patients in each group were needed. Patient characteristics were collected in each group and evaluated by χ2 and t tests. P values of less than .05 were considered significant. Results: A total of 223 children having undergone PEG (110 tubes, 113 buttons) were identified. No differences were found in operative time, intraoperative complications, clogging, breakage, infections, emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions. However, children undergoing PEG button placement were more likely to spend only one night in the hospital vs PEG tube (60% vs 25%, respectively; P < .001). In addition, PEG buttons had fewer dislodgments (4 vs 15; P < .05). Conclusion: The PEG buttons are less likely to become dislodged than PEG tubes. Infection rates were not found to be different between groups. Children with PEG buttons were more likely to be discharged earlier than children with PEG tubes. Primary PEG buttons are clinically comparable to PEG tubes with less concern for dislodgements.

KW - Dislodgement

KW - Length of stay

KW - PEG

KW - Wound infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66649131940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66649131940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.024

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.024

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1193

EP - 1196

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 6

ER -