Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy

Marcelino E. Rivera, Amy Krambeck

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Retrograde ureteroscopy has become a mainstay in the treatment of ureteral and renal calculi. Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the numberof retrograde ureteroscopic procedures performed for stone disease due to both high postoperative stone-free rates and low incidence of complications. Thus, it is not surprising that ureteroscopy is gaining acceptance as the primary treatment modality for upper tract stone disease. However, there are certain circumstances when retrograde ureteroscopy is not successful or feasible, such as altered anatomy or very large stone size. In such circumstances, alternate treatment options must be considered. Antegrade ureteroscopy (URS) performed through a percutaneous approach is often a useful treatment option for proximal and mid-ureteral calculi when retrograde URS is not possible. The following chapter will discuss a brief history of percutaneous ureteral stone surgery, modern uses of antegrade URS, indications for antegrade URS, a description of current technique, and a discussion of postoperative management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationUreteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages127-136
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9783319087924
ISBN (Print)9783319087917
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Percutaneous Nephrostomy
Surgery
Ureteral Calculi
Kidney Calculi
Anatomy
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

Rivera, M. E., & Krambeck, A. (2015). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy. In Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach (pp. 127-136). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy. / Rivera, Marcelino E.; Krambeck, Amy.

Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach. Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 127-136.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rivera, ME & Krambeck, A 2015, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy. in Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach. Springer International Publishing, pp. 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9
Rivera ME, Krambeck A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy. In Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach. Springer International Publishing. 2015. p. 127-136 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9
Rivera, Marcelino E. ; Krambeck, Amy. / Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy. Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach. Springer International Publishing, 2015. pp. 127-136
@inbook{28cdf62efb3a45d0b394baab90ef5e1e,
title = "Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy",
abstract = "Retrograde ureteroscopy has become a mainstay in the treatment of ureteral and renal calculi. Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the numberof retrograde ureteroscopic procedures performed for stone disease due to both high postoperative stone-free rates and low incidence of complications. Thus, it is not surprising that ureteroscopy is gaining acceptance as the primary treatment modality for upper tract stone disease. However, there are certain circumstances when retrograde ureteroscopy is not successful or feasible, such as altered anatomy or very large stone size. In such circumstances, alternate treatment options must be considered. Antegrade ureteroscopy (URS) performed through a percutaneous approach is often a useful treatment option for proximal and mid-ureteral calculi when retrograde URS is not possible. The following chapter will discuss a brief history of percutaneous ureteral stone surgery, modern uses of antegrade URS, indications for antegrade URS, a description of current technique, and a discussion of postoperative management.",
author = "Rivera, {Marcelino E.} and Amy Krambeck",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319087917",
pages = "127--136",
booktitle = "Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and antegrade ureteroscopy

AU - Rivera, Marcelino E.

AU - Krambeck, Amy

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Retrograde ureteroscopy has become a mainstay in the treatment of ureteral and renal calculi. Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the numberof retrograde ureteroscopic procedures performed for stone disease due to both high postoperative stone-free rates and low incidence of complications. Thus, it is not surprising that ureteroscopy is gaining acceptance as the primary treatment modality for upper tract stone disease. However, there are certain circumstances when retrograde ureteroscopy is not successful or feasible, such as altered anatomy or very large stone size. In such circumstances, alternate treatment options must be considered. Antegrade ureteroscopy (URS) performed through a percutaneous approach is often a useful treatment option for proximal and mid-ureteral calculi when retrograde URS is not possible. The following chapter will discuss a brief history of percutaneous ureteral stone surgery, modern uses of antegrade URS, indications for antegrade URS, a description of current technique, and a discussion of postoperative management.

AB - Retrograde ureteroscopy has become a mainstay in the treatment of ureteral and renal calculi. Over the past decade there has been a dramatic increase in the numberof retrograde ureteroscopic procedures performed for stone disease due to both high postoperative stone-free rates and low incidence of complications. Thus, it is not surprising that ureteroscopy is gaining acceptance as the primary treatment modality for upper tract stone disease. However, there are certain circumstances when retrograde ureteroscopy is not successful or feasible, such as altered anatomy or very large stone size. In such circumstances, alternate treatment options must be considered. Antegrade ureteroscopy (URS) performed through a percutaneous approach is often a useful treatment option for proximal and mid-ureteral calculi when retrograde URS is not possible. The following chapter will discuss a brief history of percutaneous ureteral stone surgery, modern uses of antegrade URS, indications for antegrade URS, a description of current technique, and a discussion of postoperative management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955100106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955100106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-08792-4_9

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84955100106

SN - 9783319087917

SP - 127

EP - 136

BT - Ureteral Stone Management: A Practical Approach

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -