Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections

M. Hong Nguyen, Cornelius J. Clancy, A. William Pasculle, Peter G. Pappas, George Alangaden, George A. Pankey, Bryan Schmitt, Altaf Rasool, Melvin P. Weinstein, Raymond Widen, Diana R. Hernandez, Donna M. Wolk, Thomas J. Walsh, John R. Perfect, Mollie N. Wilson, Eleftherios Mylonakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Blood cultures, the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs), are insensitive and limited by prolonged time to results. The T2Bacteria Panel (T2 Biosystems) is a direct-from-blood, nonculture test that identifies the most common ESKAPE bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). Objective: To assess performance of the T2Bacteria Panel in diagnosing suspected BSIs in adults. Design: Prospective patient enrollment (8 December 2015 through 4 August 2017). Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals. Patients: 1427 patients for whom blood cultures were ordered as standard of care. Intervention: Paired blood culture and T2Bacteria testing. Measurements: Performance of T2Bacteria compared with a single set of blood cultures in diagnosing proven, probable, and possible BSIs caused by T2Bacteria-targeted organisms. Results: Blood culture and T2Bacteria results were positive for targeted bacteria in 3% (39 of 1427) and 13% (181 of 1427) of patients, respectively. Mean times from start of blood culture incubation to positivity and species identification were 38.5 (SD, 32.8) and 71.7 (SD, 39.3) hours, respectively. Mean times to species identification with T2Bacteria were 3.61 (SD, 0.2) to 7.70 (SD, 1.38) hours, depending on the number of samples tested. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of T2Bacteria for proven BSIs were 90% (95% CI, 76% to 96%) and 90% (CI, 88% to 91%), respectively; the negative predictive value was 99.7% (1242 of 1246). The rate of negative blood cultures with a positive T2Bacteria result was 10% (146 of 1427); 60% (88 of 146) of such results were associated with probable (n = 62) or possible (n = 26) BSIs. If probable BSIs and both probable and possible BSIs were assumed to be true positives missed by blood culture, per-patient specificity of T2Bacteria was 94% and 96%, respectively. Limitation: Low prevalence of positive blood cultures, collection of a single set of culture specimens, and inability of T2Bacteria to detect nontargeted pathogens. Conclusion: The T2Bacteria Panel rapidly and accurately diagnoses BSIs caused by 5 common bacteria.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)845-852
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume170
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 18 2019

Fingerprint

Infection
Bacteria
Staphylococcal Pneumonia
Blood Culture
Enterococcus faecium
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Hematologic Tests
Standard of Care
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Escherichia coli
Sensitivity and Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Hong Nguyen, M., Clancy, C. J., William Pasculle, A., Pappas, P. G., Alangaden, G., Pankey, G. A., ... Mylonakis, E. (2019). Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Annals of internal medicine, 170(12), 845-852. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2772

Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections. / Hong Nguyen, M.; Clancy, Cornelius J.; William Pasculle, A.; Pappas, Peter G.; Alangaden, George; Pankey, George A.; Schmitt, Bryan; Rasool, Altaf; Weinstein, Melvin P.; Widen, Raymond; Hernandez, Diana R.; Wolk, Donna M.; Walsh, Thomas J.; Perfect, John R.; Wilson, Mollie N.; Mylonakis, Eleftherios.

In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 170, No. 12, 18.06.2019, p. 845-852.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hong Nguyen, M, Clancy, CJ, William Pasculle, A, Pappas, PG, Alangaden, G, Pankey, GA, Schmitt, B, Rasool, A, Weinstein, MP, Widen, R, Hernandez, DR, Wolk, DM, Walsh, TJ, Perfect, JR, Wilson, MN & Mylonakis, E 2019, 'Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections', Annals of internal medicine, vol. 170, no. 12, pp. 845-852. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2772
Hong Nguyen M, Clancy CJ, William Pasculle A, Pappas PG, Alangaden G, Pankey GA et al. Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Annals of internal medicine. 2019 Jun 18;170(12):845-852. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2772
Hong Nguyen, M. ; Clancy, Cornelius J. ; William Pasculle, A. ; Pappas, Peter G. ; Alangaden, George ; Pankey, George A. ; Schmitt, Bryan ; Rasool, Altaf ; Weinstein, Melvin P. ; Widen, Raymond ; Hernandez, Diana R. ; Wolk, Donna M. ; Walsh, Thomas J. ; Perfect, John R. ; Wilson, Mollie N. ; Mylonakis, Eleftherios. / Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections. In: Annals of internal medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 170, No. 12. pp. 845-852.
@article{0ae7e87cf9ed44ac9f6db0b8989fba0c,
title = "Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections",
abstract = "Background: Blood cultures, the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs), are insensitive and limited by prolonged time to results. The T2Bacteria Panel (T2 Biosystems) is a direct-from-blood, nonculture test that identifies the most common ESKAPE bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). Objective: To assess performance of the T2Bacteria Panel in diagnosing suspected BSIs in adults. Design: Prospective patient enrollment (8 December 2015 through 4 August 2017). Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals. Patients: 1427 patients for whom blood cultures were ordered as standard of care. Intervention: Paired blood culture and T2Bacteria testing. Measurements: Performance of T2Bacteria compared with a single set of blood cultures in diagnosing proven, probable, and possible BSIs caused by T2Bacteria-targeted organisms. Results: Blood culture and T2Bacteria results were positive for targeted bacteria in 3{\%} (39 of 1427) and 13{\%} (181 of 1427) of patients, respectively. Mean times from start of blood culture incubation to positivity and species identification were 38.5 (SD, 32.8) and 71.7 (SD, 39.3) hours, respectively. Mean times to species identification with T2Bacteria were 3.61 (SD, 0.2) to 7.70 (SD, 1.38) hours, depending on the number of samples tested. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of T2Bacteria for proven BSIs were 90{\%} (95{\%} CI, 76{\%} to 96{\%}) and 90{\%} (CI, 88{\%} to 91{\%}), respectively; the negative predictive value was 99.7{\%} (1242 of 1246). The rate of negative blood cultures with a positive T2Bacteria result was 10{\%} (146 of 1427); 60{\%} (88 of 146) of such results were associated with probable (n = 62) or possible (n = 26) BSIs. If probable BSIs and both probable and possible BSIs were assumed to be true positives missed by blood culture, per-patient specificity of T2Bacteria was 94{\%} and 96{\%}, respectively. Limitation: Low prevalence of positive blood cultures, collection of a single set of culture specimens, and inability of T2Bacteria to detect nontargeted pathogens. Conclusion: The T2Bacteria Panel rapidly and accurately diagnoses BSIs caused by 5 common bacteria.",
author = "{Hong Nguyen}, M. and Clancy, {Cornelius J.} and {William Pasculle}, A. and Pappas, {Peter G.} and George Alangaden and Pankey, {George A.} and Bryan Schmitt and Altaf Rasool and Weinstein, {Melvin P.} and Raymond Widen and Hernandez, {Diana R.} and Wolk, {Donna M.} and Walsh, {Thomas J.} and Perfect, {John R.} and Wilson, {Mollie N.} and Eleftherios Mylonakis",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "18",
doi = "10.7326/M18-2772",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "170",
pages = "845--852",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of the T2bacteria panel for diagnosing bloodstream infections

AU - Hong Nguyen, M.

AU - Clancy, Cornelius J.

AU - William Pasculle, A.

AU - Pappas, Peter G.

AU - Alangaden, George

AU - Pankey, George A.

AU - Schmitt, Bryan

AU - Rasool, Altaf

AU - Weinstein, Melvin P.

AU - Widen, Raymond

AU - Hernandez, Diana R.

AU - Wolk, Donna M.

AU - Walsh, Thomas J.

AU - Perfect, John R.

AU - Wilson, Mollie N.

AU - Mylonakis, Eleftherios

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - Background: Blood cultures, the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs), are insensitive and limited by prolonged time to results. The T2Bacteria Panel (T2 Biosystems) is a direct-from-blood, nonculture test that identifies the most common ESKAPE bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). Objective: To assess performance of the T2Bacteria Panel in diagnosing suspected BSIs in adults. Design: Prospective patient enrollment (8 December 2015 through 4 August 2017). Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals. Patients: 1427 patients for whom blood cultures were ordered as standard of care. Intervention: Paired blood culture and T2Bacteria testing. Measurements: Performance of T2Bacteria compared with a single set of blood cultures in diagnosing proven, probable, and possible BSIs caused by T2Bacteria-targeted organisms. Results: Blood culture and T2Bacteria results were positive for targeted bacteria in 3% (39 of 1427) and 13% (181 of 1427) of patients, respectively. Mean times from start of blood culture incubation to positivity and species identification were 38.5 (SD, 32.8) and 71.7 (SD, 39.3) hours, respectively. Mean times to species identification with T2Bacteria were 3.61 (SD, 0.2) to 7.70 (SD, 1.38) hours, depending on the number of samples tested. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of T2Bacteria for proven BSIs were 90% (95% CI, 76% to 96%) and 90% (CI, 88% to 91%), respectively; the negative predictive value was 99.7% (1242 of 1246). The rate of negative blood cultures with a positive T2Bacteria result was 10% (146 of 1427); 60% (88 of 146) of such results were associated with probable (n = 62) or possible (n = 26) BSIs. If probable BSIs and both probable and possible BSIs were assumed to be true positives missed by blood culture, per-patient specificity of T2Bacteria was 94% and 96%, respectively. Limitation: Low prevalence of positive blood cultures, collection of a single set of culture specimens, and inability of T2Bacteria to detect nontargeted pathogens. Conclusion: The T2Bacteria Panel rapidly and accurately diagnoses BSIs caused by 5 common bacteria.

AB - Background: Blood cultures, the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections (BSIs), are insensitive and limited by prolonged time to results. The T2Bacteria Panel (T2 Biosystems) is a direct-from-blood, nonculture test that identifies the most common ESKAPE bacteria (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli). Objective: To assess performance of the T2Bacteria Panel in diagnosing suspected BSIs in adults. Design: Prospective patient enrollment (8 December 2015 through 4 August 2017). Setting: Eleven U.S. hospitals. Patients: 1427 patients for whom blood cultures were ordered as standard of care. Intervention: Paired blood culture and T2Bacteria testing. Measurements: Performance of T2Bacteria compared with a single set of blood cultures in diagnosing proven, probable, and possible BSIs caused by T2Bacteria-targeted organisms. Results: Blood culture and T2Bacteria results were positive for targeted bacteria in 3% (39 of 1427) and 13% (181 of 1427) of patients, respectively. Mean times from start of blood culture incubation to positivity and species identification were 38.5 (SD, 32.8) and 71.7 (SD, 39.3) hours, respectively. Mean times to species identification with T2Bacteria were 3.61 (SD, 0.2) to 7.70 (SD, 1.38) hours, depending on the number of samples tested. Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of T2Bacteria for proven BSIs were 90% (95% CI, 76% to 96%) and 90% (CI, 88% to 91%), respectively; the negative predictive value was 99.7% (1242 of 1246). The rate of negative blood cultures with a positive T2Bacteria result was 10% (146 of 1427); 60% (88 of 146) of such results were associated with probable (n = 62) or possible (n = 26) BSIs. If probable BSIs and both probable and possible BSIs were assumed to be true positives missed by blood culture, per-patient specificity of T2Bacteria was 94% and 96%, respectively. Limitation: Low prevalence of positive blood cultures, collection of a single set of culture specimens, and inability of T2Bacteria to detect nontargeted pathogens. Conclusion: The T2Bacteria Panel rapidly and accurately diagnoses BSIs caused by 5 common bacteria.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067544853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067544853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M18-2772

DO - 10.7326/M18-2772

M3 - Article

VL - 170

SP - 845

EP - 852

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 12

ER -