Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants

Marcia J. Hay-McCutcheon, Nathaniel R. Peterson, David Pisoni, Karen Iler Kirk, Xin Yang, Jason Parton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance on two challenging listening tasks, talker and regional accent discrimination, and to assess variables that could have affected the outcomes. Study design: A prospective study using 35 adults with one cochlear implant (CI) or a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing) was conducted. Adults completed talker and regional accent discrimination tasks. Methods: Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used to assess talker and accent discrimination in a group of adults who ranged in age from 30 years old to 81 years old. Results: A large amount of performance variability was observed across listeners for both discrimination tasks. Three listeners successfully discriminated between talkers for both listening tasks, 14 participants successfully completed one discrimination task and 18 participants were not able to discriminate between talkers for either listening task. Some adults who used bimodal hearing benefitted from the addition of acoustic cues provided through a HA but for others the HA did not help with discrimination abilities. Acoustic speech feature analysis of the test signals indicated that both the talker speaking rate and the fundamental frequency (F0) helped with talker discrimination. For accent discrimination, findings suggested that access to more salient spectral cues was important for better discrimination performance. Conclusions: The ability to perform challenging discrimination tasks successfully likely involves a number of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory pre- and post-implant factors. To understand why some adults with CIs perform similarly to adults with normal hearing and others experience difficulty discriminating between talkers, further research will be required with larger populations of adults who use unilateral CIs, bilateral CIs and bimodal hearing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Communication Disorders
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
discrimination
Sodium Glutamate
performance
Hearing
Aptitude
listener
acoustics
Cues
Speech Acoustics
Discrimination (Psychology)
Hearing Aids
ability
Acoustics
speaking
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Bimodal hearing
  • Cochlear implants
  • Speech discrimination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing
  • LPN and LVN

Cite this

Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants. / Hay-McCutcheon, Marcia J.; Peterson, Nathaniel R.; Pisoni, David; Kirk, Karen Iler; Yang, Xin; Parton, Jason.

In: Journal of Communication Disorders, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hay-McCutcheon, Marcia J. ; Peterson, Nathaniel R. ; Pisoni, David ; Kirk, Karen Iler ; Yang, Xin ; Parton, Jason. / Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants. In: Journal of Communication Disorders. 2018.
@article{f5ff0187fcc04faa93a1e5fb3b7607ea,
title = "Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants",
abstract = "Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance on two challenging listening tasks, talker and regional accent discrimination, and to assess variables that could have affected the outcomes. Study design: A prospective study using 35 adults with one cochlear implant (CI) or a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing) was conducted. Adults completed talker and regional accent discrimination tasks. Methods: Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used to assess talker and accent discrimination in a group of adults who ranged in age from 30 years old to 81 years old. Results: A large amount of performance variability was observed across listeners for both discrimination tasks. Three listeners successfully discriminated between talkers for both listening tasks, 14 participants successfully completed one discrimination task and 18 participants were not able to discriminate between talkers for either listening task. Some adults who used bimodal hearing benefitted from the addition of acoustic cues provided through a HA but for others the HA did not help with discrimination abilities. Acoustic speech feature analysis of the test signals indicated that both the talker speaking rate and the fundamental frequency (F0) helped with talker discrimination. For accent discrimination, findings suggested that access to more salient spectral cues was important for better discrimination performance. Conclusions: The ability to perform challenging discrimination tasks successfully likely involves a number of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory pre- and post-implant factors. To understand why some adults with CIs perform similarly to adults with normal hearing and others experience difficulty discriminating between talkers, further research will be required with larger populations of adults who use unilateral CIs, bilateral CIs and bimodal hearing.",
keywords = "Bimodal hearing, Cochlear implants, Speech discrimination",
author = "Hay-McCutcheon, {Marcia J.} and Peterson, {Nathaniel R.} and David Pisoni and Kirk, {Karen Iler} and Xin Yang and Jason Parton",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.005",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Communication Disorders",
issn = "0021-9924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants

AU - Hay-McCutcheon, Marcia J.

AU - Peterson, Nathaniel R.

AU - Pisoni, David

AU - Kirk, Karen Iler

AU - Yang, Xin

AU - Parton, Jason

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance on two challenging listening tasks, talker and regional accent discrimination, and to assess variables that could have affected the outcomes. Study design: A prospective study using 35 adults with one cochlear implant (CI) or a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing) was conducted. Adults completed talker and regional accent discrimination tasks. Methods: Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used to assess talker and accent discrimination in a group of adults who ranged in age from 30 years old to 81 years old. Results: A large amount of performance variability was observed across listeners for both discrimination tasks. Three listeners successfully discriminated between talkers for both listening tasks, 14 participants successfully completed one discrimination task and 18 participants were not able to discriminate between talkers for either listening task. Some adults who used bimodal hearing benefitted from the addition of acoustic cues provided through a HA but for others the HA did not help with discrimination abilities. Acoustic speech feature analysis of the test signals indicated that both the talker speaking rate and the fundamental frequency (F0) helped with talker discrimination. For accent discrimination, findings suggested that access to more salient spectral cues was important for better discrimination performance. Conclusions: The ability to perform challenging discrimination tasks successfully likely involves a number of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory pre- and post-implant factors. To understand why some adults with CIs perform similarly to adults with normal hearing and others experience difficulty discriminating between talkers, further research will be required with larger populations of adults who use unilateral CIs, bilateral CIs and bimodal hearing.

AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance on two challenging listening tasks, talker and regional accent discrimination, and to assess variables that could have affected the outcomes. Study design: A prospective study using 35 adults with one cochlear implant (CI) or a CI and a contralateral hearing aid (bimodal hearing) was conducted. Adults completed talker and regional accent discrimination tasks. Methods: Two-alternative forced-choice tasks were used to assess talker and accent discrimination in a group of adults who ranged in age from 30 years old to 81 years old. Results: A large amount of performance variability was observed across listeners for both discrimination tasks. Three listeners successfully discriminated between talkers for both listening tasks, 14 participants successfully completed one discrimination task and 18 participants were not able to discriminate between talkers for either listening task. Some adults who used bimodal hearing benefitted from the addition of acoustic cues provided through a HA but for others the HA did not help with discrimination abilities. Acoustic speech feature analysis of the test signals indicated that both the talker speaking rate and the fundamental frequency (F0) helped with talker discrimination. For accent discrimination, findings suggested that access to more salient spectral cues was important for better discrimination performance. Conclusions: The ability to perform challenging discrimination tasks successfully likely involves a number of complex interactions between auditory and non-auditory pre- and post-implant factors. To understand why some adults with CIs perform similarly to adults with normal hearing and others experience difficulty discriminating between talkers, further research will be required with larger populations of adults who use unilateral CIs, bilateral CIs and bimodal hearing.

KW - Bimodal hearing

KW - Cochlear implants

KW - Speech discrimination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041135445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041135445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.01.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 29395103

AN - SCOPUS:85041135445

JO - Journal of Communication Disorders

JF - Journal of Communication Disorders

SN - 0021-9924

ER -