Performing physician-patient communication within objective structured clinical examinations

Cynthia Budyn, Zeev Neuwirth, Stuart Schrader

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Medical students have traditionally been taught patient-centered interviewing using a skills-based communicative approach. Teaching communication from a skills-based approach alone may result in students enacting principals of patient-centered interviewing without learning how to build collaborative relationships within the context of a medical interview. Physician-patient relationships are not reducible to the competent practice of communication skills alone. Medical students need to be taught to view relationship-building as an inherent part of the communicative process, whereby communication cues, invitations, and other relational interactions lead to an empowered patient and to collaborative decision making. This study examines how medical students and standardized patients negotiate relational identities during a third-year objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Setting: A third-year formative medical school OSCE. Methods: In this study an interpretive method is used to thematically analyze OSCE case scenarios. Full transcripts and videotapes of one Alzheimer's case scenario were reviewed to explore how medical students' responses to the standardized patients' plotline led to the emergence of relational identities. Findings: Analysis suggests that the majority of these medical students have not yet mastered how to negotiate between the competing illness stories of patients and their caregivers. Conclusion: A performance-doctoring approach offers a different perspective on how students may narrowly focus on interpersonal communication skills, while not fully appreciating the importance of developing effective relationships when caring for and healing patients. A heightened awareness to the continuous relational shifts within medical conversations will likely improve a medical student's ability to collaboratively create improved health outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-55
Number of pages6
JournalIntegrative Medicine
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2005

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Communication
Physicians
Students
Physician-Patient Relations
Videotape Recording
Aptitude
Medical Schools
Caregivers
Cues
Decision Making
Teaching
Learning
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Constructionism
  • Medical educaition
  • OSCEs
  • Physician-patient communication
  • Relationships

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Performing physician-patient communication within objective structured clinical examinations. / Budyn, Cynthia; Neuwirth, Zeev; Schrader, Stuart.

In: Integrative Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 4, 01.08.2005, p. 50-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9ab030abeaa3463c82ff68268de36f27,
title = "Performing physician-patient communication within objective structured clinical examinations",
abstract = "Background: Medical students have traditionally been taught patient-centered interviewing using a skills-based communicative approach. Teaching communication from a skills-based approach alone may result in students enacting principals of patient-centered interviewing without learning how to build collaborative relationships within the context of a medical interview. Physician-patient relationships are not reducible to the competent practice of communication skills alone. Medical students need to be taught to view relationship-building as an inherent part of the communicative process, whereby communication cues, invitations, and other relational interactions lead to an empowered patient and to collaborative decision making. This study examines how medical students and standardized patients negotiate relational identities during a third-year objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Setting: A third-year formative medical school OSCE. Methods: In this study an interpretive method is used to thematically analyze OSCE case scenarios. Full transcripts and videotapes of one Alzheimer's case scenario were reviewed to explore how medical students' responses to the standardized patients' plotline led to the emergence of relational identities. Findings: Analysis suggests that the majority of these medical students have not yet mastered how to negotiate between the competing illness stories of patients and their caregivers. Conclusion: A performance-doctoring approach offers a different perspective on how students may narrowly focus on interpersonal communication skills, while not fully appreciating the importance of developing effective relationships when caring for and healing patients. A heightened awareness to the continuous relational shifts within medical conversations will likely improve a medical student's ability to collaboratively create improved health outcomes.",
keywords = "Constructionism, Medical educaition, OSCEs, Physician-patient communication, Relationships",
author = "Cynthia Budyn and Zeev Neuwirth and Stuart Schrader",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "50--55",
journal = "International Journal of Integrative Medicine",
issn = "1546-993X",
publisher = "InnoVision Communications",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performing physician-patient communication within objective structured clinical examinations

AU - Budyn, Cynthia

AU - Neuwirth, Zeev

AU - Schrader, Stuart

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - Background: Medical students have traditionally been taught patient-centered interviewing using a skills-based communicative approach. Teaching communication from a skills-based approach alone may result in students enacting principals of patient-centered interviewing without learning how to build collaborative relationships within the context of a medical interview. Physician-patient relationships are not reducible to the competent practice of communication skills alone. Medical students need to be taught to view relationship-building as an inherent part of the communicative process, whereby communication cues, invitations, and other relational interactions lead to an empowered patient and to collaborative decision making. This study examines how medical students and standardized patients negotiate relational identities during a third-year objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Setting: A third-year formative medical school OSCE. Methods: In this study an interpretive method is used to thematically analyze OSCE case scenarios. Full transcripts and videotapes of one Alzheimer's case scenario were reviewed to explore how medical students' responses to the standardized patients' plotline led to the emergence of relational identities. Findings: Analysis suggests that the majority of these medical students have not yet mastered how to negotiate between the competing illness stories of patients and their caregivers. Conclusion: A performance-doctoring approach offers a different perspective on how students may narrowly focus on interpersonal communication skills, while not fully appreciating the importance of developing effective relationships when caring for and healing patients. A heightened awareness to the continuous relational shifts within medical conversations will likely improve a medical student's ability to collaboratively create improved health outcomes.

AB - Background: Medical students have traditionally been taught patient-centered interviewing using a skills-based communicative approach. Teaching communication from a skills-based approach alone may result in students enacting principals of patient-centered interviewing without learning how to build collaborative relationships within the context of a medical interview. Physician-patient relationships are not reducible to the competent practice of communication skills alone. Medical students need to be taught to view relationship-building as an inherent part of the communicative process, whereby communication cues, invitations, and other relational interactions lead to an empowered patient and to collaborative decision making. This study examines how medical students and standardized patients negotiate relational identities during a third-year objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Setting: A third-year formative medical school OSCE. Methods: In this study an interpretive method is used to thematically analyze OSCE case scenarios. Full transcripts and videotapes of one Alzheimer's case scenario were reviewed to explore how medical students' responses to the standardized patients' plotline led to the emergence of relational identities. Findings: Analysis suggests that the majority of these medical students have not yet mastered how to negotiate between the competing illness stories of patients and their caregivers. Conclusion: A performance-doctoring approach offers a different perspective on how students may narrowly focus on interpersonal communication skills, while not fully appreciating the importance of developing effective relationships when caring for and healing patients. A heightened awareness to the continuous relational shifts within medical conversations will likely improve a medical student's ability to collaboratively create improved health outcomes.

KW - Constructionism

KW - Medical educaition

KW - OSCEs

KW - Physician-patient communication

KW - Relationships

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744965611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744965611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33744965611

VL - 4

SP - 50

EP - 55

JO - International Journal of Integrative Medicine

JF - International Journal of Integrative Medicine

SN - 1546-993X

IS - 4

ER -