Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education?

Daniel Croft, Stephen J. Jay, Eric M. Meslin, Margaret M. Gaffney, Jere D. Odell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the modern medical system becomes increasingly complex, a debate has arisen over the place of advocacy efforts within the medical profession. The authors argue that advocacy can help physicians fulfill their social contract. For physicians to become competent in patient-centered, clinical, administrative, or legislative advocacy, they require professional training. Many professional organizations have called for curricular reform to meet society's health needs during the past 30 years, and the inclusion of advocacy training in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education is supported on both pragmatic and ethical grounds. Undergraduate medical education, especially, is an ideal time for this training because a standard competency can be instilled across all specialties. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education includes advocacy training in curricula for residency programs, few medical schools or residency programs have advocacy electives. By understanding the challenges of the health care system and how to change it for the better, physicians can experience increased professional satisfaction and effectiveness in improving patient care, systems-based practice, and public health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1165-1170
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume87
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Medical Education
Undergraduate Medical Education
Graduate Medical Education
Internship and Residency
Physicians
physician
Public Health Practice
Continuing Medical Education
education
Accreditation
graduate
Contracts
Medical Schools
Curriculum
Patient Care
professional association
accreditation
patient care
Delivery of Health Care
pragmatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Croft, D., Jay, S. J., Meslin, E. M., Gaffney, M. M., & Odell, J. D. (2012). Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education? Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1165-1170. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc

Perspective : Is it time for advocacy training in medical education? / Croft, Daniel; Jay, Stephen J.; Meslin, Eric M.; Gaffney, Margaret M.; Odell, Jere D.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 87, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1165-1170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Croft, D, Jay, SJ, Meslin, EM, Gaffney, MM & Odell, JD 2012, 'Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education?', Academic Medicine, vol. 87, no. 9, pp. 1165-1170. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc
Croft, Daniel ; Jay, Stephen J. ; Meslin, Eric M. ; Gaffney, Margaret M. ; Odell, Jere D. / Perspective : Is it time for advocacy training in medical education?. In: Academic Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 87, No. 9. pp. 1165-1170.
@article{6d0151b5889a47738f854d2465964799,
title = "Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education?",
abstract = "As the modern medical system becomes increasingly complex, a debate has arisen over the place of advocacy efforts within the medical profession. The authors argue that advocacy can help physicians fulfill their social contract. For physicians to become competent in patient-centered, clinical, administrative, or legislative advocacy, they require professional training. Many professional organizations have called for curricular reform to meet society's health needs during the past 30 years, and the inclusion of advocacy training in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education is supported on both pragmatic and ethical grounds. Undergraduate medical education, especially, is an ideal time for this training because a standard competency can be instilled across all specialties. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education includes advocacy training in curricula for residency programs, few medical schools or residency programs have advocacy electives. By understanding the challenges of the health care system and how to change it for the better, physicians can experience increased professional satisfaction and effectiveness in improving patient care, systems-based practice, and public health.",
author = "Daniel Croft and Jay, {Stephen J.} and Meslin, {Eric M.} and Gaffney, {Margaret M.} and Odell, {Jere D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "1165--1170",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspective

T2 - Is it time for advocacy training in medical education?

AU - Croft, Daniel

AU - Jay, Stephen J.

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Gaffney, Margaret M.

AU - Odell, Jere D.

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - As the modern medical system becomes increasingly complex, a debate has arisen over the place of advocacy efforts within the medical profession. The authors argue that advocacy can help physicians fulfill their social contract. For physicians to become competent in patient-centered, clinical, administrative, or legislative advocacy, they require professional training. Many professional organizations have called for curricular reform to meet society's health needs during the past 30 years, and the inclusion of advocacy training in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education is supported on both pragmatic and ethical grounds. Undergraduate medical education, especially, is an ideal time for this training because a standard competency can be instilled across all specialties. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education includes advocacy training in curricula for residency programs, few medical schools or residency programs have advocacy electives. By understanding the challenges of the health care system and how to change it for the better, physicians can experience increased professional satisfaction and effectiveness in improving patient care, systems-based practice, and public health.

AB - As the modern medical system becomes increasingly complex, a debate has arisen over the place of advocacy efforts within the medical profession. The authors argue that advocacy can help physicians fulfill their social contract. For physicians to become competent in patient-centered, clinical, administrative, or legislative advocacy, they require professional training. Many professional organizations have called for curricular reform to meet society's health needs during the past 30 years, and the inclusion of advocacy training in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education is supported on both pragmatic and ethical grounds. Undergraduate medical education, especially, is an ideal time for this training because a standard competency can be instilled across all specialties. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education includes advocacy training in curricula for residency programs, few medical schools or residency programs have advocacy electives. By understanding the challenges of the health care system and how to change it for the better, physicians can experience increased professional satisfaction and effectiveness in improving patient care, systems-based practice, and public health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866046909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866046909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826232bc

M3 - Article

C2 - 22836845

AN - SCOPUS:84866046909

VL - 87

SP - 1165

EP - 1170

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 9

ER -