Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC

Daniel A. Rushing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This phase I/II nonrandomized, open-label study was designed to assess the safety and benefit of sequencing irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) plus paclitaxel (Taxol) immediately after cisplatin (Platinol)/etoposide (Ve-Pesid, VP-16) or carboplatin (Paraplatin)/etoposide in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Ten patients were evaluable in phase I; all had previously been treated with cisplatin and etoposide, and five of the 10 had also previously received carboplatin and paclitaxel. All 10 patients were given a fixed dose of irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and escalating doses of paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks. Three patients had grade 4 toxicities, one at the lowest dose level of paclitaxel (15 mg/m2). Two patients had grade 3 toxicities. The dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose level, when the performance status of both patients in that group decreased to 60 (Karnofsky scale). Two patients had progressive disease after 1 month of treatment and did not receive cycle 2. Three of seven patients evaluable for response had complete remissions. A fourth patient had resolution of lymphangitic metastases and resolution of a partial small bowel obstruction but did not have measurable disease. The fifth patient had a partial remission. The ongoing phase II portion of the study is restricted to previously untreated patients who will receive at least one cycle of either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide followed by irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 dosed once weekly for 3 weeks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-66
Number of pages4
JournalOncology (Williston Park, N.Y.)
Volume14
Issue number7 SUPPL. 5
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

irinotecan
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
Paclitaxel
Etoposide
Carboplatin
Cisplatin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology

Cite this

Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC. / Rushing, Daniel A.

In: Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), Vol. 14, No. 7 SUPPL. 5, 2000, p. 63-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rushing, Daniel A. / Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC. In: Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.). 2000 ; Vol. 14, No. 7 SUPPL. 5. pp. 63-66.
@article{0d8c83d9c39a468b89b92e0edd217aa2,
title = "Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC",
abstract = "This phase I/II nonrandomized, open-label study was designed to assess the safety and benefit of sequencing irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) plus paclitaxel (Taxol) immediately after cisplatin (Platinol)/etoposide (Ve-Pesid, VP-16) or carboplatin (Paraplatin)/etoposide in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Ten patients were evaluable in phase I; all had previously been treated with cisplatin and etoposide, and five of the 10 had also previously received carboplatin and paclitaxel. All 10 patients were given a fixed dose of irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and escalating doses of paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks. Three patients had grade 4 toxicities, one at the lowest dose level of paclitaxel (15 mg/m2). Two patients had grade 3 toxicities. The dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose level, when the performance status of both patients in that group decreased to 60 (Karnofsky scale). Two patients had progressive disease after 1 month of treatment and did not receive cycle 2. Three of seven patients evaluable for response had complete remissions. A fourth patient had resolution of lymphangitic metastases and resolution of a partial small bowel obstruction but did not have measurable disease. The fifth patient had a partial remission. The ongoing phase II portion of the study is restricted to previously untreated patients who will receive at least one cycle of either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide followed by irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 dosed once weekly for 3 weeks.",
author = "Rushing, {Daniel A.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "63--66",
journal = "Oncology",
issn = "0890-9091",
publisher = "UBM Medica Healthcare Publications",
number = "7 SUPPL. 5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phase I/II study of weekly irinotecan and paclitaxel in patients with SCLC

AU - Rushing, Daniel A.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This phase I/II nonrandomized, open-label study was designed to assess the safety and benefit of sequencing irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) plus paclitaxel (Taxol) immediately after cisplatin (Platinol)/etoposide (Ve-Pesid, VP-16) or carboplatin (Paraplatin)/etoposide in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Ten patients were evaluable in phase I; all had previously been treated with cisplatin and etoposide, and five of the 10 had also previously received carboplatin and paclitaxel. All 10 patients were given a fixed dose of irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and escalating doses of paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks. Three patients had grade 4 toxicities, one at the lowest dose level of paclitaxel (15 mg/m2). Two patients had grade 3 toxicities. The dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose level, when the performance status of both patients in that group decreased to 60 (Karnofsky scale). Two patients had progressive disease after 1 month of treatment and did not receive cycle 2. Three of seven patients evaluable for response had complete remissions. A fourth patient had resolution of lymphangitic metastases and resolution of a partial small bowel obstruction but did not have measurable disease. The fifth patient had a partial remission. The ongoing phase II portion of the study is restricted to previously untreated patients who will receive at least one cycle of either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide followed by irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 dosed once weekly for 3 weeks.

AB - This phase I/II nonrandomized, open-label study was designed to assess the safety and benefit of sequencing irinotecan (Camptosar, CPT-11) plus paclitaxel (Taxol) immediately after cisplatin (Platinol)/etoposide (Ve-Pesid, VP-16) or carboplatin (Paraplatin)/etoposide in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Ten patients were evaluable in phase I; all had previously been treated with cisplatin and etoposide, and five of the 10 had also previously received carboplatin and paclitaxel. All 10 patients were given a fixed dose of irinotecan (60 mg/m2) and escalating doses of paclitaxel weekly for 3 weeks. Three patients had grade 4 toxicities, one at the lowest dose level of paclitaxel (15 mg/m2). Two patients had grade 3 toxicities. The dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the 60 mg/m2 paclitaxel dose level, when the performance status of both patients in that group decreased to 60 (Karnofsky scale). Two patients had progressive disease after 1 month of treatment and did not receive cycle 2. Three of seven patients evaluable for response had complete remissions. A fourth patient had resolution of lymphangitic metastases and resolution of a partial small bowel obstruction but did not have measurable disease. The fifth patient had a partial remission. The ongoing phase II portion of the study is restricted to previously untreated patients who will receive at least one cycle of either cisplatin or carboplatin in combination with etoposide followed by irinotecan at 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 dosed once weekly for 3 weeks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034218827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034218827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 63

EP - 66

JO - Oncology

JF - Oncology

SN - 0890-9091

IS - 7 SUPPL. 5

ER -