PHQ-8 Days: A measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity

Satvinder S. Dhingra, Kurt Kroenke, Matthew M. Zack, Tara W. Strine, Lina S. Balluz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Proposed draft diagnostic criteria for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) suggest that dimensional assessments can supplement dichotomous diagnoses by incorporating measures of severity, frequency, and duration, providing the ability to monitor changes in symptoms over time and to guide appropriate treatment.Methods: This report is based on data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006 from 198,678 survey participants who responded to all eight Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) items. We evaluated use of the days version of the PHQ-8 to determine an optimal cut-point for identifying respondents with depression and to evaluate the performance characteristics of the PHQ-8 at this cut-point.Results: A PHQ-8 score of 55 or more days was determined to be the optimal cut-point when compared to the DSM-derived PHQ-8 algorithm for a major depressive episode (five or more symptoms present "more than half the days," at least one of which must be anhedonia or depression). In the full sample, the sensitivity and the specificity of this cut-point were 0.91 (0.90-0.93) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively.Conclusion: The days version of the PHQ-8 may be a valuable dimensional alternative to the traditional PHQ-8 by offering finer granularity of dimensionality (a score of 0 to 112).

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
JournalPopulation Health Metrics
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 28 2011

Fingerprint

Major Depressive Disorder
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Depression
Anhedonia
Aptitude
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Sensitivity and Specificity
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

PHQ-8 Days : A measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity. / Dhingra, Satvinder S.; Kroenke, Kurt; Zack, Matthew M.; Strine, Tara W.; Balluz, Lina S.

In: Population Health Metrics, Vol. 9, 11, 28.04.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dhingra, Satvinder S. ; Kroenke, Kurt ; Zack, Matthew M. ; Strine, Tara W. ; Balluz, Lina S. / PHQ-8 Days : A measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity. In: Population Health Metrics. 2011 ; Vol. 9.
@article{c276814b3e8a44a581a89554e0850bb8,
title = "PHQ-8 Days: A measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity",
abstract = "Background: Proposed draft diagnostic criteria for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) suggest that dimensional assessments can supplement dichotomous diagnoses by incorporating measures of severity, frequency, and duration, providing the ability to monitor changes in symptoms over time and to guide appropriate treatment.Methods: This report is based on data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006 from 198,678 survey participants who responded to all eight Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) items. We evaluated use of the days version of the PHQ-8 to determine an optimal cut-point for identifying respondents with depression and to evaluate the performance characteristics of the PHQ-8 at this cut-point.Results: A PHQ-8 score of 55 or more days was determined to be the optimal cut-point when compared to the DSM-derived PHQ-8 algorithm for a major depressive episode (five or more symptoms present {"}more than half the days,{"} at least one of which must be anhedonia or depression). In the full sample, the sensitivity and the specificity of this cut-point were 0.91 (0.90-0.93) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively.Conclusion: The days version of the PHQ-8 may be a valuable dimensional alternative to the traditional PHQ-8 by offering finer granularity of dimensionality (a score of 0 to 112).",
author = "Dhingra, {Satvinder S.} and Kurt Kroenke and Zack, {Matthew M.} and Strine, {Tara W.} and Balluz, {Lina S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1186/1478-7954-9-11",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Population Health Metrics",
issn = "1478-7954",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PHQ-8 Days

T2 - A measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity

AU - Dhingra, Satvinder S.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Zack, Matthew M.

AU - Strine, Tara W.

AU - Balluz, Lina S.

PY - 2011/4/28

Y1 - 2011/4/28

N2 - Background: Proposed draft diagnostic criteria for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) suggest that dimensional assessments can supplement dichotomous diagnoses by incorporating measures of severity, frequency, and duration, providing the ability to monitor changes in symptoms over time and to guide appropriate treatment.Methods: This report is based on data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006 from 198,678 survey participants who responded to all eight Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) items. We evaluated use of the days version of the PHQ-8 to determine an optimal cut-point for identifying respondents with depression and to evaluate the performance characteristics of the PHQ-8 at this cut-point.Results: A PHQ-8 score of 55 or more days was determined to be the optimal cut-point when compared to the DSM-derived PHQ-8 algorithm for a major depressive episode (five or more symptoms present "more than half the days," at least one of which must be anhedonia or depression). In the full sample, the sensitivity and the specificity of this cut-point were 0.91 (0.90-0.93) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively.Conclusion: The days version of the PHQ-8 may be a valuable dimensional alternative to the traditional PHQ-8 by offering finer granularity of dimensionality (a score of 0 to 112).

AB - Background: Proposed draft diagnostic criteria for the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) suggest that dimensional assessments can supplement dichotomous diagnoses by incorporating measures of severity, frequency, and duration, providing the ability to monitor changes in symptoms over time and to guide appropriate treatment.Methods: This report is based on data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2006 from 198,678 survey participants who responded to all eight Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) items. We evaluated use of the days version of the PHQ-8 to determine an optimal cut-point for identifying respondents with depression and to evaluate the performance characteristics of the PHQ-8 at this cut-point.Results: A PHQ-8 score of 55 or more days was determined to be the optimal cut-point when compared to the DSM-derived PHQ-8 algorithm for a major depressive episode (five or more symptoms present "more than half the days," at least one of which must be anhedonia or depression). In the full sample, the sensitivity and the specificity of this cut-point were 0.91 (0.90-0.93) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99), respectively.Conclusion: The days version of the PHQ-8 may be a valuable dimensional alternative to the traditional PHQ-8 by offering finer granularity of dimensionality (a score of 0 to 112).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955161346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955161346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1478-7954-9-11

DO - 10.1186/1478-7954-9-11

M3 - Article

C2 - 21527015

AN - SCOPUS:79955161346

VL - 9

JO - Population Health Metrics

JF - Population Health Metrics

SN - 1478-7954

M1 - 11

ER -