Physicians in Postgraduate Training Characteristics and Support of Palliative Sedation for Existential Distress

Larry Cripe, Susan Perkins, Ann Cottingham, Yan Tong, Mary Ann Kozak, Rakesh Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Palliative sedation for refractory existential distress (PS-ED) is ethically troubling but potentially critical to quality end-of-life (EOL) care. Physicians’ in postgraduate training support toward PS-ED is unknown nor is it known how empathy, hope, optimism, or intrinsic religious motivation (IRM) affect their support. These knowledge gaps hinder efforts to support physicians who struggle with patients’ EOL care preferences. Methods: One hundred thirty-four postgraduate physicians rated their support of PS for refractory physical pain (PS-PP) or PS-ED, ranked the importance of patient preferences in ethically challenging situations, and completed measures of empathy, hope, optimism, and IRM. Predictors of PS-ED and PS-PP support were examined using binary and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Only 22.7% of residents were very supportive of PS-ED, and 82.0% were very supportive of PS-PP. Support for PS-PP or PS-ED did not correlate with levels of empathy, hope, optimism, or IRM; however, for residents with lower IRM, greater optimism was associated with greater PS-ED support. In contrast, among residents with higher IRM, optimism was not associated with PS-ED support. Conclusions: Comparing current results to published surveys, a similar proportion of residents and practicing physicians support PS-ED and PS-PP. In contrast to practicing physicians, however, IRM does not directly influence residents’ supportiveness. The interaction between optimism and IRM suggests residents’ beliefs and characteristics are salient to their EOL decisions. End-of-life curricula should provide physicians opportunities to reflect on the personal and ethical factors that influence their support for PS-ED.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-703
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
Volume34
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Training Support
Intractable Pain
Motivation
Hope
Physicians
Terminal Care
Patient Preference
Curriculum
Optimism
Logistic Models
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • end-of-life care
  • existential distress
  • healthcare provider characteristics
  • palliative sedation
  • patient preferences
  • postgraduate medical curriculum
  • religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Physicians in Postgraduate Training Characteristics and Support of Palliative Sedation for Existential Distress. / Cripe, Larry; Perkins, Susan; Cottingham, Ann; Tong, Yan; Kozak, Mary Ann; Mehta, Rakesh.

In: American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Vol. 34, No. 8, 01.09.2017, p. 697-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a41834dfbbb45e0b3d608fcec8aab76,
title = "Physicians in Postgraduate Training Characteristics and Support of Palliative Sedation for Existential Distress",
abstract = "Introduction: Palliative sedation for refractory existential distress (PS-ED) is ethically troubling but potentially critical to quality end-of-life (EOL) care. Physicians’ in postgraduate training support toward PS-ED is unknown nor is it known how empathy, hope, optimism, or intrinsic religious motivation (IRM) affect their support. These knowledge gaps hinder efforts to support physicians who struggle with patients’ EOL care preferences. Methods: One hundred thirty-four postgraduate physicians rated their support of PS for refractory physical pain (PS-PP) or PS-ED, ranked the importance of patient preferences in ethically challenging situations, and completed measures of empathy, hope, optimism, and IRM. Predictors of PS-ED and PS-PP support were examined using binary and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Only 22.7{\%} of residents were very supportive of PS-ED, and 82.0{\%} were very supportive of PS-PP. Support for PS-PP or PS-ED did not correlate with levels of empathy, hope, optimism, or IRM; however, for residents with lower IRM, greater optimism was associated with greater PS-ED support. In contrast, among residents with higher IRM, optimism was not associated with PS-ED support. Conclusions: Comparing current results to published surveys, a similar proportion of residents and practicing physicians support PS-ED and PS-PP. In contrast to practicing physicians, however, IRM does not directly influence residents’ supportiveness. The interaction between optimism and IRM suggests residents’ beliefs and characteristics are salient to their EOL decisions. End-of-life curricula should provide physicians opportunities to reflect on the personal and ethical factors that influence their support for PS-ED.",
keywords = "end-of-life care, existential distress, healthcare provider characteristics, palliative sedation, patient preferences, postgraduate medical curriculum, religiosity",
author = "Larry Cripe and Susan Perkins and Ann Cottingham and Yan Tong and Kozak, {Mary Ann} and Rakesh Mehta",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1049909116660516",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "697--703",
journal = "American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1049-9091",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physicians in Postgraduate Training Characteristics and Support of Palliative Sedation for Existential Distress

AU - Cripe, Larry

AU - Perkins, Susan

AU - Cottingham, Ann

AU - Tong, Yan

AU - Kozak, Mary Ann

AU - Mehta, Rakesh

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Introduction: Palliative sedation for refractory existential distress (PS-ED) is ethically troubling but potentially critical to quality end-of-life (EOL) care. Physicians’ in postgraduate training support toward PS-ED is unknown nor is it known how empathy, hope, optimism, or intrinsic religious motivation (IRM) affect their support. These knowledge gaps hinder efforts to support physicians who struggle with patients’ EOL care preferences. Methods: One hundred thirty-four postgraduate physicians rated their support of PS for refractory physical pain (PS-PP) or PS-ED, ranked the importance of patient preferences in ethically challenging situations, and completed measures of empathy, hope, optimism, and IRM. Predictors of PS-ED and PS-PP support were examined using binary and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Only 22.7% of residents were very supportive of PS-ED, and 82.0% were very supportive of PS-PP. Support for PS-PP or PS-ED did not correlate with levels of empathy, hope, optimism, or IRM; however, for residents with lower IRM, greater optimism was associated with greater PS-ED support. In contrast, among residents with higher IRM, optimism was not associated with PS-ED support. Conclusions: Comparing current results to published surveys, a similar proportion of residents and practicing physicians support PS-ED and PS-PP. In contrast to practicing physicians, however, IRM does not directly influence residents’ supportiveness. The interaction between optimism and IRM suggests residents’ beliefs and characteristics are salient to their EOL decisions. End-of-life curricula should provide physicians opportunities to reflect on the personal and ethical factors that influence their support for PS-ED.

AB - Introduction: Palliative sedation for refractory existential distress (PS-ED) is ethically troubling but potentially critical to quality end-of-life (EOL) care. Physicians’ in postgraduate training support toward PS-ED is unknown nor is it known how empathy, hope, optimism, or intrinsic religious motivation (IRM) affect their support. These knowledge gaps hinder efforts to support physicians who struggle with patients’ EOL care preferences. Methods: One hundred thirty-four postgraduate physicians rated their support of PS for refractory physical pain (PS-PP) or PS-ED, ranked the importance of patient preferences in ethically challenging situations, and completed measures of empathy, hope, optimism, and IRM. Predictors of PS-ED and PS-PP support were examined using binary and multinomial logistic regression. Results: Only 22.7% of residents were very supportive of PS-ED, and 82.0% were very supportive of PS-PP. Support for PS-PP or PS-ED did not correlate with levels of empathy, hope, optimism, or IRM; however, for residents with lower IRM, greater optimism was associated with greater PS-ED support. In contrast, among residents with higher IRM, optimism was not associated with PS-ED support. Conclusions: Comparing current results to published surveys, a similar proportion of residents and practicing physicians support PS-ED and PS-PP. In contrast to practicing physicians, however, IRM does not directly influence residents’ supportiveness. The interaction between optimism and IRM suggests residents’ beliefs and characteristics are salient to their EOL decisions. End-of-life curricula should provide physicians opportunities to reflect on the personal and ethical factors that influence their support for PS-ED.

KW - end-of-life care

KW - existential distress

KW - healthcare provider characteristics

KW - palliative sedation

KW - patient preferences

KW - postgraduate medical curriculum

KW - religiosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026367756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026367756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049909116660516

DO - 10.1177/1049909116660516

M3 - Article

C2 - 27432319

AN - SCOPUS:85026367756

VL - 34

SP - 697

EP - 703

JO - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

JF - American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine

SN - 1049-9091

IS - 8

ER -