Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making

Alexia Torke, Rachael Moloney, Mark Siegler, Anna Abalos, G. Caleb Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults. MEASUREMENTS: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences. RESULTS: Overall, 72.6% of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2% identified advanced directives and 11.4% substituted judgment). Of the 73.3% of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8% reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4% reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95% CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-538
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume58
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Patient Preference
Decision Making
Physicians
Odds Ratio
Living Wills
Guidelines
Confidence Intervals
Community Hospital
Intensive Care Units
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Decision-making
  • Ethics
  • Proxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making. / Torke, Alexia; Moloney, Rachael; Siegler, Mark; Abalos, Anna; Alexander, G. Caleb.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 58, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 533-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Torke, Alexia ; Moloney, Rachael ; Siegler, Mark ; Abalos, Anna ; Alexander, G. Caleb. / Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2010 ; Vol. 58, No. 3. pp. 533-538.
@article{2cac346fe59643ce922220eead9f6929,
title = "Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults. MEASUREMENTS: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences. RESULTS: Overall, 72.6{\%} of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2{\%} identified advanced directives and 11.4{\%} substituted judgment). Of the 73.3{\%} of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8{\%} reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4{\%} reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95{\%} CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Ethics, Proxy",
author = "Alexia Torke and Rachael Moloney and Mark Siegler and Anna Abalos and Alexander, {G. Caleb}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "533--538",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making

AU - Torke, Alexia

AU - Moloney, Rachael

AU - Siegler, Mark

AU - Abalos, Anna

AU - Alexander, G. Caleb

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults. MEASUREMENTS: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences. RESULTS: Overall, 72.6% of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2% identified advanced directives and 11.4% substituted judgment). Of the 73.3% of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8% reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4% reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95% CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To explore the degree to which physicians report reliance on patient preferences when making medical decisions for hospitalized patients lacking decisional capacity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One academic and two community hospitals in a single metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred eighty-one physicians who recently cared for hospitalized adults. MEASUREMENTS: A self-administered survey addressing physicians' beliefs about ethical principles guiding surrogate decision-making and physicians' recent decision-making experiences. RESULTS: Overall, 72.6% of physicians identified a standard related to patient preferences as the most important ethical standard for surrogate decision-making (61.2% identified advanced directives and 11.4% substituted judgment). Of the 73.3% of physicians who reported recently making a surrogate decision, 81.8% reported that patient preferences were highly important in decision-making, although only 29.4% reported that patient preference was the most important factor in the decision. Physicians were significantly more likely to base decisions on patient preferences when the patient was in the intensive care unit (odds ratio (OR)=2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.15-7.45) and less likely when the patient was older (OR=0.76 for each decade of age, 95% CI=0.58-0.99). The presence of a living will, prior discussions with the patient, and the physicians' beliefs about ethical guidelines did not significantly predict the physicians' reliance on patient preferences. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of physicians identified patient preferences as the most important general ethical guideline for surrogate decision-making, they relied on a variety of factors when making treatment decisions for a patient lacking decisional capacity.

KW - Decision-making

KW - Ethics

KW - Proxy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949414916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949414916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02720.x

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 533

EP - 538

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 3

ER -