Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle

Evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy

Liang Tang, Gyo Seung Hwang, Juan Song, Peng-Sheng Chen, Shien-Fong Lin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Novel Defibrillation Strategy. Introduction: A failed near-threshold defibrillation shock is followed by an isoelectric window (IEW) and rapid repetitive responses that reinitiate ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that properly timed (synchronized) postshock pacing stimuli (SyncP) may capture the recovered tissues during the repetitive responses and prevent postshock reinitiation of VF, resulting in improved defibrillation efficacy. Methods and Results: We explored the effect of postshock SyncP on defibrillation efficacy in isolated rabbit hearts (n = 12). Optical recording-guided real-time detection and electrical stimulation (5 mA) of recovered tissues in anterior/posterior left ventricle (LV) were performed following IEW. The IEW duration was found to be 69 ± 13 ms. With the same shock strength, successful and failed defibrillation episodes were associated with 50% and 15% of the myocardium, respectively, captured by the SyncP (P <0.001). Electrical stimulation from the posterior LV resulted in 75% of episodes capturing myocardium, as compared with anterior LV stimulation (55%; P <0.01) and higher successful defibrillation rate (14%, posterior vs. 3%, anterior LV). The overall success in terminating VF by postshock SyncP was approximately 10%. The causes for failed myocardium capture by postshock SyncP included lack of IEW after low-strength shock (42.9%), incorrect locations of reference site (25.7%) and pacing electrodes (17.9%), and others, such as wave breakthroughs (13.5%). Conclusion: Postshock SyncP was feasible and the larger the myocardium captured area, the more likely was the successful defibrillation. Postshock SyncP delivered to the posterior LV was more effective than anterior LV to terminate VF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)740-749
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume18
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Ventricles
Shock
Ventricular Fibrillation
Rabbits
Myocardium
Electric Stimulation
Electrodes

Keywords

  • Arrhythmias
  • Optical mapping
  • Pacing
  • Ventricular defibrillation
  • Ventricular fibrillation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle : Evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy. / Tang, Liang; Hwang, Gyo Seung; Song, Juan; Chen, Peng-Sheng; Lin, Shien-Fong.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 18, No. 7, 07.2007, p. 740-749.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{658bb0ab6da6403982bb14e0949a5be5,
title = "Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle: Evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy",
abstract = "Novel Defibrillation Strategy. Introduction: A failed near-threshold defibrillation shock is followed by an isoelectric window (IEW) and rapid repetitive responses that reinitiate ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that properly timed (synchronized) postshock pacing stimuli (SyncP) may capture the recovered tissues during the repetitive responses and prevent postshock reinitiation of VF, resulting in improved defibrillation efficacy. Methods and Results: We explored the effect of postshock SyncP on defibrillation efficacy in isolated rabbit hearts (n = 12). Optical recording-guided real-time detection and electrical stimulation (5 mA) of recovered tissues in anterior/posterior left ventricle (LV) were performed following IEW. The IEW duration was found to be 69 ± 13 ms. With the same shock strength, successful and failed defibrillation episodes were associated with 50{\%} and 15{\%} of the myocardium, respectively, captured by the SyncP (P <0.001). Electrical stimulation from the posterior LV resulted in 75{\%} of episodes capturing myocardium, as compared with anterior LV stimulation (55{\%}; P <0.01) and higher successful defibrillation rate (14{\%}, posterior vs. 3{\%}, anterior LV). The overall success in terminating VF by postshock SyncP was approximately 10{\%}. The causes for failed myocardium capture by postshock SyncP included lack of IEW after low-strength shock (42.9{\%}), incorrect locations of reference site (25.7{\%}) and pacing electrodes (17.9{\%}), and others, such as wave breakthroughs (13.5{\%}). Conclusion: Postshock SyncP was feasible and the larger the myocardium captured area, the more likely was the successful defibrillation. Postshock SyncP delivered to the posterior LV was more effective than anterior LV to terminate VF.",
keywords = "Arrhythmias, Optical mapping, Pacing, Ventricular defibrillation, Ventricular fibrillation",
author = "Liang Tang and Hwang, {Gyo Seung} and Juan Song and Peng-Sheng Chen and Shien-Fong Lin",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00792.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "740--749",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post-shock synchronized pacing in isolated rabbit left ventricle

T2 - Evaluation of a novel defibrillation strategy

AU - Tang, Liang

AU - Hwang, Gyo Seung

AU - Song, Juan

AU - Chen, Peng-Sheng

AU - Lin, Shien-Fong

PY - 2007/7

Y1 - 2007/7

N2 - Novel Defibrillation Strategy. Introduction: A failed near-threshold defibrillation shock is followed by an isoelectric window (IEW) and rapid repetitive responses that reinitiate ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that properly timed (synchronized) postshock pacing stimuli (SyncP) may capture the recovered tissues during the repetitive responses and prevent postshock reinitiation of VF, resulting in improved defibrillation efficacy. Methods and Results: We explored the effect of postshock SyncP on defibrillation efficacy in isolated rabbit hearts (n = 12). Optical recording-guided real-time detection and electrical stimulation (5 mA) of recovered tissues in anterior/posterior left ventricle (LV) were performed following IEW. The IEW duration was found to be 69 ± 13 ms. With the same shock strength, successful and failed defibrillation episodes were associated with 50% and 15% of the myocardium, respectively, captured by the SyncP (P <0.001). Electrical stimulation from the posterior LV resulted in 75% of episodes capturing myocardium, as compared with anterior LV stimulation (55%; P <0.01) and higher successful defibrillation rate (14%, posterior vs. 3%, anterior LV). The overall success in terminating VF by postshock SyncP was approximately 10%. The causes for failed myocardium capture by postshock SyncP included lack of IEW after low-strength shock (42.9%), incorrect locations of reference site (25.7%) and pacing electrodes (17.9%), and others, such as wave breakthroughs (13.5%). Conclusion: Postshock SyncP was feasible and the larger the myocardium captured area, the more likely was the successful defibrillation. Postshock SyncP delivered to the posterior LV was more effective than anterior LV to terminate VF.

AB - Novel Defibrillation Strategy. Introduction: A failed near-threshold defibrillation shock is followed by an isoelectric window (IEW) and rapid repetitive responses that reinitiate ventricular fibrillation (VF). We hypothesized that properly timed (synchronized) postshock pacing stimuli (SyncP) may capture the recovered tissues during the repetitive responses and prevent postshock reinitiation of VF, resulting in improved defibrillation efficacy. Methods and Results: We explored the effect of postshock SyncP on defibrillation efficacy in isolated rabbit hearts (n = 12). Optical recording-guided real-time detection and electrical stimulation (5 mA) of recovered tissues in anterior/posterior left ventricle (LV) were performed following IEW. The IEW duration was found to be 69 ± 13 ms. With the same shock strength, successful and failed defibrillation episodes were associated with 50% and 15% of the myocardium, respectively, captured by the SyncP (P <0.001). Electrical stimulation from the posterior LV resulted in 75% of episodes capturing myocardium, as compared with anterior LV stimulation (55%; P <0.01) and higher successful defibrillation rate (14%, posterior vs. 3%, anterior LV). The overall success in terminating VF by postshock SyncP was approximately 10%. The causes for failed myocardium capture by postshock SyncP included lack of IEW after low-strength shock (42.9%), incorrect locations of reference site (25.7%) and pacing electrodes (17.9%), and others, such as wave breakthroughs (13.5%). Conclusion: Postshock SyncP was feasible and the larger the myocardium captured area, the more likely was the successful defibrillation. Postshock SyncP delivered to the posterior LV was more effective than anterior LV to terminate VF.

KW - Arrhythmias

KW - Optical mapping

KW - Pacing

KW - Ventricular defibrillation

KW - Ventricular fibrillation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250684836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250684836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00792.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00792.x

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 740

EP - 749

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 7

ER -