Postacute brain injury rehabilitation

James F. Malec, Jeffrey S. Basford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

137 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This review compares outcomes of adult postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR) with natural recovery after brain injury. Potential outcome predictors and the effectiveness of behavioral, cognitive, pharmacologic, and vocational interventions are also appraised. The importance of standardized outcome assessment is discussed in the context of other research considerations. Although generally uncontrolled, the studies reviewed document benefits for many individuals with bruin injury, including increased independence and a rate of return to independent work or training that exceeds 50% and may reach 60% to 80% for intensive comprehensive (holistic) day treatment programs. Available research is sufficiently encouraging to recommend more carefully controlled randomized studies. Future research should emphasize the development of standardized measures of patient characteristics and outcomes, and matching of patient characteristics with optimal rehabilitation approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-207
Number of pages10
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Rehabilitation
Return to Work
Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Wounds and Injuries
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. / Malec, James F.; Basford, Jeffrey S.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 77, No. 2, 02.1996, p. 198-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malec, James F. ; Basford, Jeffrey S. / Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1996 ; Vol. 77, No. 2. pp. 198-207.
@article{58efd4dbddc44c979b6b712cfac943b2,
title = "Postacute brain injury rehabilitation",
abstract = "This review compares outcomes of adult postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR) with natural recovery after brain injury. Potential outcome predictors and the effectiveness of behavioral, cognitive, pharmacologic, and vocational interventions are also appraised. The importance of standardized outcome assessment is discussed in the context of other research considerations. Although generally uncontrolled, the studies reviewed document benefits for many individuals with bruin injury, including increased independence and a rate of return to independent work or training that exceeds 50{\%} and may reach 60{\%} to 80{\%} for intensive comprehensive (holistic) day treatment programs. Available research is sufficiently encouraging to recommend more carefully controlled randomized studies. Future research should emphasize the development of standardized measures of patient characteristics and outcomes, and matching of patient characteristics with optimal rehabilitation approaches.",
author = "Malec, {James F.} and Basford, {Jeffrey S.}",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90168-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "198--207",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Postacute brain injury rehabilitation

AU - Malec, James F.

AU - Basford, Jeffrey S.

PY - 1996/2

Y1 - 1996/2

N2 - This review compares outcomes of adult postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR) with natural recovery after brain injury. Potential outcome predictors and the effectiveness of behavioral, cognitive, pharmacologic, and vocational interventions are also appraised. The importance of standardized outcome assessment is discussed in the context of other research considerations. Although generally uncontrolled, the studies reviewed document benefits for many individuals with bruin injury, including increased independence and a rate of return to independent work or training that exceeds 50% and may reach 60% to 80% for intensive comprehensive (holistic) day treatment programs. Available research is sufficiently encouraging to recommend more carefully controlled randomized studies. Future research should emphasize the development of standardized measures of patient characteristics and outcomes, and matching of patient characteristics with optimal rehabilitation approaches.

AB - This review compares outcomes of adult postacute brain injury rehabilitation (PABIR) with natural recovery after brain injury. Potential outcome predictors and the effectiveness of behavioral, cognitive, pharmacologic, and vocational interventions are also appraised. The importance of standardized outcome assessment is discussed in the context of other research considerations. Although generally uncontrolled, the studies reviewed document benefits for many individuals with bruin injury, including increased independence and a rate of return to independent work or training that exceeds 50% and may reach 60% to 80% for intensive comprehensive (holistic) day treatment programs. Available research is sufficiently encouraging to recommend more carefully controlled randomized studies. Future research should emphasize the development of standardized measures of patient characteristics and outcomes, and matching of patient characteristics with optimal rehabilitation approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030030718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030030718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90168-9

DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90168-9

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 198

EP - 207

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 2

ER -