Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives

Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Douglas J. Opel, Neal W. Dickert, Daniel B. Kramer, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds, Keren Ladin, Monica E. Peek, Jeff Peppercorn, Jon Tilburt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM)-when clinicians and patients make medical decisions together-is moving swiftly from an ethical ideal toward widespread clinical implementation affecting millions of patients through recent policy initiatives. We argue that policy initiatives to promote SDM implementation in clinical practice carry the risk of several unintended negative consequences if limitations in defining and measuring SDM are not addressed. We urge policy makers to include prespecified definitions of desired outcomes, offer guidance on the tools used to measure SDM in the multitude of contexts in which it occurs, evaluate the impact of SDM policy initiatives over time, review that impact at regular intervals, and revise SDM measurement tools as needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1876-1881
Number of pages6
JournalHealth affairs (Project Hope)
Volume38
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Administrative Personnel

Keywords

  • Cancer patients
  • ethics
  • Health policy
  • Medical research
  • patient engagement
  • public health
  • Quality of care
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Blumenthal-Barby, J., Opel, D. J., Dickert, N. W., Kramer, D. B., Tucker Edmonds, B., Ladin, K., ... Tilburt, J. (2019). Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives. Health affairs (Project Hope), 38(11), 1876-1881. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243

Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives. / Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer; Opel, Douglas J.; Dickert, Neal W.; Kramer, Daniel B.; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne; Ladin, Keren; Peek, Monica E.; Peppercorn, Jeff; Tilburt, Jon.

In: Health affairs (Project Hope), Vol. 38, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 1876-1881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blumenthal-Barby, J, Opel, DJ, Dickert, NW, Kramer, DB, Tucker Edmonds, B, Ladin, K, Peek, ME, Peppercorn, J & Tilburt, J 2019, 'Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives', Health affairs (Project Hope), vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1876-1881. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243
Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer ; Opel, Douglas J. ; Dickert, Neal W. ; Kramer, Daniel B. ; Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne ; Ladin, Keren ; Peek, Monica E. ; Peppercorn, Jeff ; Tilburt, Jon. / Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives. In: Health affairs (Project Hope). 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 11. pp. 1876-1881.
@article{a4686d4ca5e5466fb877df728b5a7b99,
title = "Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives",
abstract = "Shared decision making (SDM)-when clinicians and patients make medical decisions together-is moving swiftly from an ethical ideal toward widespread clinical implementation affecting millions of patients through recent policy initiatives. We argue that policy initiatives to promote SDM implementation in clinical practice carry the risk of several unintended negative consequences if limitations in defining and measuring SDM are not addressed. We urge policy makers to include prespecified definitions of desired outcomes, offer guidance on the tools used to measure SDM in the multitude of contexts in which it occurs, evaluate the impact of SDM policy initiatives over time, review that impact at regular intervals, and revise SDM measurement tools as needed.",
keywords = "Cancer patients, ethics, Health policy, Medical research, patient engagement, public health, Quality of care, Shared decision making",
author = "Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby and Opel, {Douglas J.} and Dickert, {Neal W.} and Kramer, {Daniel B.} and {Tucker Edmonds}, Brownsyne and Keren Ladin and Peek, {Monica E.} and Jeff Peppercorn and Jon Tilburt",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1876--1881",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential Unintended Consequences Of Recent Shared Decision Making Policy Initiatives

AU - Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer

AU - Opel, Douglas J.

AU - Dickert, Neal W.

AU - Kramer, Daniel B.

AU - Tucker Edmonds, Brownsyne

AU - Ladin, Keren

AU - Peek, Monica E.

AU - Peppercorn, Jeff

AU - Tilburt, Jon

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Shared decision making (SDM)-when clinicians and patients make medical decisions together-is moving swiftly from an ethical ideal toward widespread clinical implementation affecting millions of patients through recent policy initiatives. We argue that policy initiatives to promote SDM implementation in clinical practice carry the risk of several unintended negative consequences if limitations in defining and measuring SDM are not addressed. We urge policy makers to include prespecified definitions of desired outcomes, offer guidance on the tools used to measure SDM in the multitude of contexts in which it occurs, evaluate the impact of SDM policy initiatives over time, review that impact at regular intervals, and revise SDM measurement tools as needed.

AB - Shared decision making (SDM)-when clinicians and patients make medical decisions together-is moving swiftly from an ethical ideal toward widespread clinical implementation affecting millions of patients through recent policy initiatives. We argue that policy initiatives to promote SDM implementation in clinical practice carry the risk of several unintended negative consequences if limitations in defining and measuring SDM are not addressed. We urge policy makers to include prespecified definitions of desired outcomes, offer guidance on the tools used to measure SDM in the multitude of contexts in which it occurs, evaluate the impact of SDM policy initiatives over time, review that impact at regular intervals, and revise SDM measurement tools as needed.

KW - Cancer patients

KW - ethics

KW - Health policy

KW - Medical research

KW - patient engagement

KW - public health

KW - Quality of care

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074549643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074549643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00243

M3 - Article

C2 - 31682503

AN - SCOPUS:85074549643

VL - 38

SP - 1876

EP - 1881

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 11

ER -