Prediction of orthodontic treatment of surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine patients

Brian Smitha, Kelton Stewartb, Sean Liuc, George Eckertd, Katherine Kulae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether clinical variables associated with surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine cases are predictors for orthodontic treatment choices involving (1) extraction, (2) expansion, (3) extraction and expansion, or (4) nonextraction and nonexpansion. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of records of 97 cases meeting the inclusion criteria with unilateral maxillary impacted canines from three private practices were reviewed for gender, age, molar classification, impaction location and angulation, and presence of pretreatment maxillary and mandibular casts and cephalograms. Maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and lower incisor crowding were obtained from occlusal cast images using custom computer software. Skeletal analysis and incisor angulation and position were obtained from digitized cephalometric tracings. Statistical comparisons were made to determine parameters orthodontists could use to develop an orthodontic treatment plan. Results: Subjects with Class II end-on molars on the nonaffected side were less likely to have extraction and/or expansion. Subjects with extraction and/or expansion had decreased lower incisor to mandibular plane, available canine space, maxillary premolars, and molar transverse dimensions and an increased mandibular incisor Irregularity Index compared with nonextraction/ nonexpansion subjects. Using a multiple-variable model, available canine space was the single most important predictor of extraction and/or expansion, followed by maxillary molar transverse dimension and mandibular incisor Irregularity Index. Conclusions: Available canine space, maxillary transverse dimension at the molars, and the mandibular incisor Irregularity Index serve as indicators for extraction and/or expansion in cases involving unilateral maxillary impacted canines requiring surgical exposure. Many of these cases are treated without extraction and/or expansion. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:723-731.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)723-731
Number of pages9
JournalAngle Orthodontist
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2012

Fingerprint

Incisor
Orthodontics
Canidae
Therapeutics
Palatal Expansion Technique
Cephalometry
Private Practice
Bicuspid
Software
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Expansion
  • Extraction
  • Impacted canines
  • Nonexpansion
  • Nonextraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthodontics

Cite this

Prediction of orthodontic treatment of surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine patients. / Smitha, Brian; Stewartb, Kelton; Liuc, Sean; Eckertd, George; Kulae, Katherine.

In: Angle Orthodontist, Vol. 82, No. 4, 01.07.2012, p. 723-731.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smitha, Brian ; Stewartb, Kelton ; Liuc, Sean ; Eckertd, George ; Kulae, Katherine. / Prediction of orthodontic treatment of surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine patients. In: Angle Orthodontist. 2012 ; Vol. 82, No. 4. pp. 723-731.
@article{11de2725e9f54e668274089d8e39cc4c,
title = "Prediction of orthodontic treatment of surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine patients",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether clinical variables associated with surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine cases are predictors for orthodontic treatment choices involving (1) extraction, (2) expansion, (3) extraction and expansion, or (4) nonextraction and nonexpansion. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of records of 97 cases meeting the inclusion criteria with unilateral maxillary impacted canines from three private practices were reviewed for gender, age, molar classification, impaction location and angulation, and presence of pretreatment maxillary and mandibular casts and cephalograms. Maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and lower incisor crowding were obtained from occlusal cast images using custom computer software. Skeletal analysis and incisor angulation and position were obtained from digitized cephalometric tracings. Statistical comparisons were made to determine parameters orthodontists could use to develop an orthodontic treatment plan. Results: Subjects with Class II end-on molars on the nonaffected side were less likely to have extraction and/or expansion. Subjects with extraction and/or expansion had decreased lower incisor to mandibular plane, available canine space, maxillary premolars, and molar transverse dimensions and an increased mandibular incisor Irregularity Index compared with nonextraction/ nonexpansion subjects. Using a multiple-variable model, available canine space was the single most important predictor of extraction and/or expansion, followed by maxillary molar transverse dimension and mandibular incisor Irregularity Index. Conclusions: Available canine space, maxillary transverse dimension at the molars, and the mandibular incisor Irregularity Index serve as indicators for extraction and/or expansion in cases involving unilateral maxillary impacted canines requiring surgical exposure. Many of these cases are treated without extraction and/or expansion. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:723-731.)",
keywords = "Expansion, Extraction, Impacted canines, Nonexpansion, Nonextraction",
author = "Brian Smitha and Kelton Stewartb and Sean Liuc and George Eckertd and Katherine Kulae",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2319/070511-431.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "723--731",
journal = "Angle Orthodontist",
issn = "0003-3219",
publisher = "E H Angle Orthodontists Research & Education Foundation, Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prediction of orthodontic treatment of surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine patients

AU - Smitha, Brian

AU - Stewartb, Kelton

AU - Liuc, Sean

AU - Eckertd, George

AU - Kulae, Katherine

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Objective: To determine whether clinical variables associated with surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine cases are predictors for orthodontic treatment choices involving (1) extraction, (2) expansion, (3) extraction and expansion, or (4) nonextraction and nonexpansion. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of records of 97 cases meeting the inclusion criteria with unilateral maxillary impacted canines from three private practices were reviewed for gender, age, molar classification, impaction location and angulation, and presence of pretreatment maxillary and mandibular casts and cephalograms. Maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and lower incisor crowding were obtained from occlusal cast images using custom computer software. Skeletal analysis and incisor angulation and position were obtained from digitized cephalometric tracings. Statistical comparisons were made to determine parameters orthodontists could use to develop an orthodontic treatment plan. Results: Subjects with Class II end-on molars on the nonaffected side were less likely to have extraction and/or expansion. Subjects with extraction and/or expansion had decreased lower incisor to mandibular plane, available canine space, maxillary premolars, and molar transverse dimensions and an increased mandibular incisor Irregularity Index compared with nonextraction/ nonexpansion subjects. Using a multiple-variable model, available canine space was the single most important predictor of extraction and/or expansion, followed by maxillary molar transverse dimension and mandibular incisor Irregularity Index. Conclusions: Available canine space, maxillary transverse dimension at the molars, and the mandibular incisor Irregularity Index serve as indicators for extraction and/or expansion in cases involving unilateral maxillary impacted canines requiring surgical exposure. Many of these cases are treated without extraction and/or expansion. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:723-731.)

AB - Objective: To determine whether clinical variables associated with surgically exposed unilateral maxillary impacted canine cases are predictors for orthodontic treatment choices involving (1) extraction, (2) expansion, (3) extraction and expansion, or (4) nonextraction and nonexpansion. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of records of 97 cases meeting the inclusion criteria with unilateral maxillary impacted canines from three private practices were reviewed for gender, age, molar classification, impaction location and angulation, and presence of pretreatment maxillary and mandibular casts and cephalograms. Maxillary and mandibular transverse dimensions and lower incisor crowding were obtained from occlusal cast images using custom computer software. Skeletal analysis and incisor angulation and position were obtained from digitized cephalometric tracings. Statistical comparisons were made to determine parameters orthodontists could use to develop an orthodontic treatment plan. Results: Subjects with Class II end-on molars on the nonaffected side were less likely to have extraction and/or expansion. Subjects with extraction and/or expansion had decreased lower incisor to mandibular plane, available canine space, maxillary premolars, and molar transverse dimensions and an increased mandibular incisor Irregularity Index compared with nonextraction/ nonexpansion subjects. Using a multiple-variable model, available canine space was the single most important predictor of extraction and/or expansion, followed by maxillary molar transverse dimension and mandibular incisor Irregularity Index. Conclusions: Available canine space, maxillary transverse dimension at the molars, and the mandibular incisor Irregularity Index serve as indicators for extraction and/or expansion in cases involving unilateral maxillary impacted canines requiring surgical exposure. Many of these cases are treated without extraction and/or expansion. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:723-731.)

KW - Expansion

KW - Extraction

KW - Impacted canines

KW - Nonexpansion

KW - Nonextraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865241675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865241675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2319/070511-431.1

DO - 10.2319/070511-431.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 22149623

AN - SCOPUS:84865241675

VL - 82

SP - 723

EP - 731

JO - Angle Orthodontist

JF - Angle Orthodontist

SN - 0003-3219

IS - 4

ER -