Predictors of citations in the urological literature

Daniel L. Willis, Clinton Bahler, Molly M. Neuberger, Philipp Dahm

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the factors associated with increased citation rates in the urological literature by reviewing articles published in the four major urological journals to help authors improve the impact of their work. A random sample of 200 original research articles published between January and June 2004 was analysed from The Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and BJU International. Study information was abstracted by two independent reviewers and citation counts within 4 years of publication were collected using Web of ScienceTM. Study characteristics and citation rates were analysed using median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate which factors predicted greater citation rates. The overall median number of citations per published article was 6.0 (IQR 3-12). After univariate analysis, we found that study design, study topic, continent of origin and sample size were associated with greater median citation rates. In a multivariate linear regression model, study design and study topic (oncology) predicted increased citation rates. Randomized controlled trials were cited a median of 13.5 times and were the strongest predictor of citation rates with an odds ratio of 115.5 (95% confidence interval 9.4-1419.6). Citation rates are associated with study design and study topic in the urological literature. Authors may improve the impact of their work by designing clinical studies with greater methodological safeguards against bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1876-1880
Number of pages5
JournalBJU International
Volume107
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Urology
Linear Models
Sample Size
Publications
Randomized Controlled Trials
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Research

Keywords

  • bibliometrics
  • citation
  • citation analysis
  • journal impact factor
  • self-citation
  • urology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Predictors of citations in the urological literature. / Willis, Daniel L.; Bahler, Clinton; Neuberger, Molly M.; Dahm, Philipp.

In: BJU International, Vol. 107, No. 12, 06.2011, p. 1876-1880.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Willis, Daniel L. ; Bahler, Clinton ; Neuberger, Molly M. ; Dahm, Philipp. / Predictors of citations in the urological literature. In: BJU International. 2011 ; Vol. 107, No. 12. pp. 1876-1880.
@article{2d736187c6514745bdc185ff951903f7,
title = "Predictors of citations in the urological literature",
abstract = "To assess the factors associated with increased citation rates in the urological literature by reviewing articles published in the four major urological journals to help authors improve the impact of their work. A random sample of 200 original research articles published between January and June 2004 was analysed from The Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and BJU International. Study information was abstracted by two independent reviewers and citation counts within 4 years of publication were collected using Web of ScienceTM. Study characteristics and citation rates were analysed using median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate which factors predicted greater citation rates. The overall median number of citations per published article was 6.0 (IQR 3-12). After univariate analysis, we found that study design, study topic, continent of origin and sample size were associated with greater median citation rates. In a multivariate linear regression model, study design and study topic (oncology) predicted increased citation rates. Randomized controlled trials were cited a median of 13.5 times and were the strongest predictor of citation rates with an odds ratio of 115.5 (95{\%} confidence interval 9.4-1419.6). Citation rates are associated with study design and study topic in the urological literature. Authors may improve the impact of their work by designing clinical studies with greater methodological safeguards against bias.",
keywords = "bibliometrics, citation, citation analysis, journal impact factor, self-citation, urology",
author = "Willis, {Daniel L.} and Clinton Bahler and Neuberger, {Molly M.} and Philipp Dahm",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10028.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "107",
pages = "1876--1880",
journal = "BJU International",
issn = "1464-4096",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of citations in the urological literature

AU - Willis, Daniel L.

AU - Bahler, Clinton

AU - Neuberger, Molly M.

AU - Dahm, Philipp

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - To assess the factors associated with increased citation rates in the urological literature by reviewing articles published in the four major urological journals to help authors improve the impact of their work. A random sample of 200 original research articles published between January and June 2004 was analysed from The Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and BJU International. Study information was abstracted by two independent reviewers and citation counts within 4 years of publication were collected using Web of ScienceTM. Study characteristics and citation rates were analysed using median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate which factors predicted greater citation rates. The overall median number of citations per published article was 6.0 (IQR 3-12). After univariate analysis, we found that study design, study topic, continent of origin and sample size were associated with greater median citation rates. In a multivariate linear regression model, study design and study topic (oncology) predicted increased citation rates. Randomized controlled trials were cited a median of 13.5 times and were the strongest predictor of citation rates with an odds ratio of 115.5 (95% confidence interval 9.4-1419.6). Citation rates are associated with study design and study topic in the urological literature. Authors may improve the impact of their work by designing clinical studies with greater methodological safeguards against bias.

AB - To assess the factors associated with increased citation rates in the urological literature by reviewing articles published in the four major urological journals to help authors improve the impact of their work. A random sample of 200 original research articles published between January and June 2004 was analysed from The Journal of Urology, Urology, European Urology and BJU International. Study information was abstracted by two independent reviewers and citation counts within 4 years of publication were collected using Web of ScienceTM. Study characteristics and citation rates were analysed using median and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate which factors predicted greater citation rates. The overall median number of citations per published article was 6.0 (IQR 3-12). After univariate analysis, we found that study design, study topic, continent of origin and sample size were associated with greater median citation rates. In a multivariate linear regression model, study design and study topic (oncology) predicted increased citation rates. Randomized controlled trials were cited a median of 13.5 times and were the strongest predictor of citation rates with an odds ratio of 115.5 (95% confidence interval 9.4-1419.6). Citation rates are associated with study design and study topic in the urological literature. Authors may improve the impact of their work by designing clinical studies with greater methodological safeguards against bias.

KW - bibliometrics

KW - citation

KW - citation analysis

KW - journal impact factor

KW - self-citation

KW - urology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957853895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957853895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10028.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10028.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 21332629

AN - SCOPUS:79957853895

VL - 107

SP - 1876

EP - 1880

JO - BJU International

JF - BJU International

SN - 1464-4096

IS - 12

ER -