Pregnancy Intentions and Contraceptive Behaviors Among Adolescent Women: A Coital Event Level Analysis

Deborah Bartz, Marcia Shew, Susan Ofner, J. Fortenberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Measuring pregnancy intentions has been difficult. This study examines questions regarding pregnancy intentions and their association with adolescents' sexual and contraceptive behaviors longitudinally. Methods: Adolescent women completed an interview about pregnancy intentions followed by a 3-month daily diary period reporting coital activity and contraception use. Interviews assessed pregnancy intentions with: "Are you trying to get pregnant now?," "Are you trying to keep from getting pregnant now?," and "I'm very committed to not getting pregnant at this time in my life." The measured outcome was the occurrence of contraceptive protected versus non-protected coitus collected from diary data. Logistic regression was used to assess this relationship. Results: A total of 289 women completed 677 face-to-face interviews and subsequent 3 months of diary collection. In all, 194 reported having sex during diary collection. Women trying to keep from getting pregnant (n = 265) had 51.8% of 2533 coital events covered by contraception, whereas 13.1% of 818 coital events were protected in those women who were not trying to keep from getting pregnant (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 6.0, 13.9). Women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant were more likely to have coital events protected (50.5% of 2574 events) than those who disagreed (21.2% of 576 events) (OR = 9.8, 95% CI = 5.5, 17.3). Conclusions: Adolescents' contraceptive behaviors were associated with reported intentions. However, approximately one half of coital events were not protected in women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant. These women may represent a group at risk for unintended pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-276
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Contraception Behavior
Pregnancy
Adolescent Behavior
Interviews
Contraception
Coitus
Contraceptive Agents
Sexual Behavior
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • Adolescent behavior
  • Contraception
  • Pregnancy in adolescence
  • Pregnancy intentions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Pregnancy Intentions and Contraceptive Behaviors Among Adolescent Women : A Coital Event Level Analysis. / Bartz, Deborah; Shew, Marcia; Ofner, Susan; Fortenberry, J.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 41, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 271-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccf73391762c4c7f8837ea57ee3e86df,
title = "Pregnancy Intentions and Contraceptive Behaviors Among Adolescent Women: A Coital Event Level Analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: Measuring pregnancy intentions has been difficult. This study examines questions regarding pregnancy intentions and their association with adolescents' sexual and contraceptive behaviors longitudinally. Methods: Adolescent women completed an interview about pregnancy intentions followed by a 3-month daily diary period reporting coital activity and contraception use. Interviews assessed pregnancy intentions with: {"}Are you trying to get pregnant now?,{"} {"}Are you trying to keep from getting pregnant now?,{"} and {"}I'm very committed to not getting pregnant at this time in my life.{"} The measured outcome was the occurrence of contraceptive protected versus non-protected coitus collected from diary data. Logistic regression was used to assess this relationship. Results: A total of 289 women completed 677 face-to-face interviews and subsequent 3 months of diary collection. In all, 194 reported having sex during diary collection. Women trying to keep from getting pregnant (n = 265) had 51.8{\%} of 2533 coital events covered by contraception, whereas 13.1{\%} of 818 coital events were protected in those women who were not trying to keep from getting pregnant (OR = 9.2, 95{\%} CI = 6.0, 13.9). Women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant were more likely to have coital events protected (50.5{\%} of 2574 events) than those who disagreed (21.2{\%} of 576 events) (OR = 9.8, 95{\%} CI = 5.5, 17.3). Conclusions: Adolescents' contraceptive behaviors were associated with reported intentions. However, approximately one half of coital events were not protected in women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant. These women may represent a group at risk for unintended pregnancy.",
keywords = "Adolescent behavior, Contraception, Pregnancy in adolescence, Pregnancy intentions",
author = "Deborah Bartz and Marcia Shew and Susan Ofner and J. Fortenberry",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "271--276",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pregnancy Intentions and Contraceptive Behaviors Among Adolescent Women

T2 - A Coital Event Level Analysis

AU - Bartz, Deborah

AU - Shew, Marcia

AU - Ofner, Susan

AU - Fortenberry, J.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Purpose: Measuring pregnancy intentions has been difficult. This study examines questions regarding pregnancy intentions and their association with adolescents' sexual and contraceptive behaviors longitudinally. Methods: Adolescent women completed an interview about pregnancy intentions followed by a 3-month daily diary period reporting coital activity and contraception use. Interviews assessed pregnancy intentions with: "Are you trying to get pregnant now?," "Are you trying to keep from getting pregnant now?," and "I'm very committed to not getting pregnant at this time in my life." The measured outcome was the occurrence of contraceptive protected versus non-protected coitus collected from diary data. Logistic regression was used to assess this relationship. Results: A total of 289 women completed 677 face-to-face interviews and subsequent 3 months of diary collection. In all, 194 reported having sex during diary collection. Women trying to keep from getting pregnant (n = 265) had 51.8% of 2533 coital events covered by contraception, whereas 13.1% of 818 coital events were protected in those women who were not trying to keep from getting pregnant (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 6.0, 13.9). Women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant were more likely to have coital events protected (50.5% of 2574 events) than those who disagreed (21.2% of 576 events) (OR = 9.8, 95% CI = 5.5, 17.3). Conclusions: Adolescents' contraceptive behaviors were associated with reported intentions. However, approximately one half of coital events were not protected in women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant. These women may represent a group at risk for unintended pregnancy.

AB - Purpose: Measuring pregnancy intentions has been difficult. This study examines questions regarding pregnancy intentions and their association with adolescents' sexual and contraceptive behaviors longitudinally. Methods: Adolescent women completed an interview about pregnancy intentions followed by a 3-month daily diary period reporting coital activity and contraception use. Interviews assessed pregnancy intentions with: "Are you trying to get pregnant now?," "Are you trying to keep from getting pregnant now?," and "I'm very committed to not getting pregnant at this time in my life." The measured outcome was the occurrence of contraceptive protected versus non-protected coitus collected from diary data. Logistic regression was used to assess this relationship. Results: A total of 289 women completed 677 face-to-face interviews and subsequent 3 months of diary collection. In all, 194 reported having sex during diary collection. Women trying to keep from getting pregnant (n = 265) had 51.8% of 2533 coital events covered by contraception, whereas 13.1% of 818 coital events were protected in those women who were not trying to keep from getting pregnant (OR = 9.2, 95% CI = 6.0, 13.9). Women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant were more likely to have coital events protected (50.5% of 2574 events) than those who disagreed (21.2% of 576 events) (OR = 9.8, 95% CI = 5.5, 17.3). Conclusions: Adolescents' contraceptive behaviors were associated with reported intentions. However, approximately one half of coital events were not protected in women who agreed that they were committed to not getting pregnant. These women may represent a group at risk for unintended pregnancy.

KW - Adolescent behavior

KW - Contraception

KW - Pregnancy in adolescence

KW - Pregnancy intentions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547838104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547838104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 17707297

AN - SCOPUS:34547838104

VL - 41

SP - 271

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 3

ER -