Preliminary study to establish a relationship between tactile sensation and surface roughness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of tactile sensations to distinguish roughness. Five examiners experienced in visual examination participated. Tactile sensation was assessed by 3 standard references, the average roughnesses 0.49, 0.92 and 1.54 μm. The examiners evaluated the roughness using 2 different ends of sharp explorers (TU 17 SE and 23 SE), each with 2 different handles (Standard Handle and No. 6 Handle-Satin Steel), and 1 WHO probe using a 5-point response score. The examiners performed 3 evaluations to establish repeatability. Using the 23 SE explorer with the steel handle was the best option to distinguish between 3 roughnesses (p <0.05). The intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were between 0.90 and 0.98, but the interexaminer ICC were only between 0 and 0.04, indicating that, although trained examiners could repeat their own scores, they were not consistent with each other in grading roughness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)24-28
Number of pages5
JournalCaries Research
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Steel
Touch
Aptitude

Keywords

  • Caries diagnosis
  • Caries lesion activity
  • Optical profilometry
  • Periodontal probe
  • Surface roughness
  • Surface texture
  • Tactile sensation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Preliminary study to establish a relationship between tactile sensation and surface roughness. / Ando, Masatoshi; Eckert, G. J.; Zero, Domenick.

In: Caries Research, Vol. 44, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 24-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{106b6e6cc16748af988955e74580c0d8,
title = "Preliminary study to establish a relationship between tactile sensation and surface roughness",
abstract = "This study evaluated the ability of tactile sensations to distinguish roughness. Five examiners experienced in visual examination participated. Tactile sensation was assessed by 3 standard references, the average roughnesses 0.49, 0.92 and 1.54 μm. The examiners evaluated the roughness using 2 different ends of sharp explorers (TU 17 SE and 23 SE), each with 2 different handles (Standard Handle and No. 6 Handle-Satin Steel), and 1 WHO probe using a 5-point response score. The examiners performed 3 evaluations to establish repeatability. Using the 23 SE explorer with the steel handle was the best option to distinguish between 3 roughnesses (p <0.05). The intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were between 0.90 and 0.98, but the interexaminer ICC were only between 0 and 0.04, indicating that, although trained examiners could repeat their own scores, they were not consistent with each other in grading roughness.",
keywords = "Caries diagnosis, Caries lesion activity, Optical profilometry, Periodontal probe, Surface roughness, Surface texture, Tactile sensation",
author = "Masatoshi Ando and Eckert, {G. J.} and Domenick Zero",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1159/000275570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "24--28",
journal = "Caries Research",
issn = "0008-6568",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary study to establish a relationship between tactile sensation and surface roughness

AU - Ando, Masatoshi

AU - Eckert, G. J.

AU - Zero, Domenick

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - This study evaluated the ability of tactile sensations to distinguish roughness. Five examiners experienced in visual examination participated. Tactile sensation was assessed by 3 standard references, the average roughnesses 0.49, 0.92 and 1.54 μm. The examiners evaluated the roughness using 2 different ends of sharp explorers (TU 17 SE and 23 SE), each with 2 different handles (Standard Handle and No. 6 Handle-Satin Steel), and 1 WHO probe using a 5-point response score. The examiners performed 3 evaluations to establish repeatability. Using the 23 SE explorer with the steel handle was the best option to distinguish between 3 roughnesses (p <0.05). The intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were between 0.90 and 0.98, but the interexaminer ICC were only between 0 and 0.04, indicating that, although trained examiners could repeat their own scores, they were not consistent with each other in grading roughness.

AB - This study evaluated the ability of tactile sensations to distinguish roughness. Five examiners experienced in visual examination participated. Tactile sensation was assessed by 3 standard references, the average roughnesses 0.49, 0.92 and 1.54 μm. The examiners evaluated the roughness using 2 different ends of sharp explorers (TU 17 SE and 23 SE), each with 2 different handles (Standard Handle and No. 6 Handle-Satin Steel), and 1 WHO probe using a 5-point response score. The examiners performed 3 evaluations to establish repeatability. Using the 23 SE explorer with the steel handle was the best option to distinguish between 3 roughnesses (p <0.05). The intraexaminer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were between 0.90 and 0.98, but the interexaminer ICC were only between 0 and 0.04, indicating that, although trained examiners could repeat their own scores, they were not consistent with each other in grading roughness.

KW - Caries diagnosis

KW - Caries lesion activity

KW - Optical profilometry

KW - Periodontal probe

KW - Surface roughness

KW - Surface texture

KW - Tactile sensation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74249111577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74249111577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000275570

DO - 10.1159/000275570

M3 - Article

C2 - 20090324

AN - SCOPUS:74249111577

VL - 44

SP - 24

EP - 28

JO - Caries Research

JF - Caries Research

SN - 0008-6568

IS - 1

ER -