Preoperative needle localization in the breast: Utility of local anesthesia

Handel E. Reynolds, Valerie Jackson, Beverly S. Musick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing needle localization at two facilities were alternately assigned to "local-anesthesia" (M = 46) and "no-local-anesthesia" (M = 43) groups. Those in the local-anesthesia group received 1-2 mL lidocaine hydrochloride 1% subcutaneously at the expected site of insertion of the localizing needle. All patients were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced from the procedure as a whole by using a 10-cm horizontal visual analog pain scale. Data about patient age, menopausal and menstrual status, average daily caffeine intake, and whether the patients considered mammography to be a painful procedure were collected. Patients who did not receive local anesthesia had a lower mean pain score (2.52) than those who did (3.27, P = .18). Premenopausal patients in the second half of their menstrual cycle at the time of the procedure had a significantly higher pain score than those in the first half (3.54 vs 1.70, P = .05). Patients who considered mammography a painful procedure reported a higher level of pain than those who did not (3.79 vs 2.38, P = .012). There was no relationship between age, caffeine intake, or menopausal status and pain experienced.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-505
Number of pages3
JournalRadiology
Volume187
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1993

Fingerprint

Local Anesthesia
Needles
Breast
Pain
Mammography
Caffeine
Pain Measurement
Menstrual Cycle
Lidocaine

Keywords

  • Anesthesia
  • Breast, biopsy, 00.1261
  • Breast, surgery, 00.1267

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Preoperative needle localization in the breast : Utility of local anesthesia. / Reynolds, Handel E.; Jackson, Valerie; Musick, Beverly S.

In: Radiology, Vol. 187, No. 2, 05.1993, p. 503-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reynolds, HE, Jackson, V & Musick, BS 1993, 'Preoperative needle localization in the breast: Utility of local anesthesia', Radiology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 503-505.
Reynolds, Handel E. ; Jackson, Valerie ; Musick, Beverly S. / Preoperative needle localization in the breast : Utility of local anesthesia. In: Radiology. 1993 ; Vol. 187, No. 2. pp. 503-505.
@article{4717eec2873e4601af3cd225696020dd,
title = "Preoperative needle localization in the breast: Utility of local anesthesia",
abstract = "Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing needle localization at two facilities were alternately assigned to {"}local-anesthesia{"} (M = 46) and {"}no-local-anesthesia{"} (M = 43) groups. Those in the local-anesthesia group received 1-2 mL lidocaine hydrochloride 1{\%} subcutaneously at the expected site of insertion of the localizing needle. All patients were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced from the procedure as a whole by using a 10-cm horizontal visual analog pain scale. Data about patient age, menopausal and menstrual status, average daily caffeine intake, and whether the patients considered mammography to be a painful procedure were collected. Patients who did not receive local anesthesia had a lower mean pain score (2.52) than those who did (3.27, P = .18). Premenopausal patients in the second half of their menstrual cycle at the time of the procedure had a significantly higher pain score than those in the first half (3.54 vs 1.70, P = .05). Patients who considered mammography a painful procedure reported a higher level of pain than those who did not (3.79 vs 2.38, P = .012). There was no relationship between age, caffeine intake, or menopausal status and pain experienced.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, Breast, biopsy, 00.1261, Breast, surgery, 00.1267",
author = "Reynolds, {Handel E.} and Valerie Jackson and Musick, {Beverly S.}",
year = "1993",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "187",
pages = "503--505",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preoperative needle localization in the breast

T2 - Utility of local anesthesia

AU - Reynolds, Handel E.

AU - Jackson, Valerie

AU - Musick, Beverly S.

PY - 1993/5

Y1 - 1993/5

N2 - Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing needle localization at two facilities were alternately assigned to "local-anesthesia" (M = 46) and "no-local-anesthesia" (M = 43) groups. Those in the local-anesthesia group received 1-2 mL lidocaine hydrochloride 1% subcutaneously at the expected site of insertion of the localizing needle. All patients were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced from the procedure as a whole by using a 10-cm horizontal visual analog pain scale. Data about patient age, menopausal and menstrual status, average daily caffeine intake, and whether the patients considered mammography to be a painful procedure were collected. Patients who did not receive local anesthesia had a lower mean pain score (2.52) than those who did (3.27, P = .18). Premenopausal patients in the second half of their menstrual cycle at the time of the procedure had a significantly higher pain score than those in the first half (3.54 vs 1.70, P = .05). Patients who considered mammography a painful procedure reported a higher level of pain than those who did not (3.79 vs 2.38, P = .012). There was no relationship between age, caffeine intake, or menopausal status and pain experienced.

AB - Eighty-nine consecutive patients undergoing needle localization at two facilities were alternately assigned to "local-anesthesia" (M = 46) and "no-local-anesthesia" (M = 43) groups. Those in the local-anesthesia group received 1-2 mL lidocaine hydrochloride 1% subcutaneously at the expected site of insertion of the localizing needle. All patients were asked to rate the level of pain they experienced from the procedure as a whole by using a 10-cm horizontal visual analog pain scale. Data about patient age, menopausal and menstrual status, average daily caffeine intake, and whether the patients considered mammography to be a painful procedure were collected. Patients who did not receive local anesthesia had a lower mean pain score (2.52) than those who did (3.27, P = .18). Premenopausal patients in the second half of their menstrual cycle at the time of the procedure had a significantly higher pain score than those in the first half (3.54 vs 1.70, P = .05). Patients who considered mammography a painful procedure reported a higher level of pain than those who did not (3.79 vs 2.38, P = .012). There was no relationship between age, caffeine intake, or menopausal status and pain experienced.

KW - Anesthesia

KW - Breast, biopsy, 00.1261

KW - Breast, surgery, 00.1267

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027196287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027196287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8475298

AN - SCOPUS:0027196287

VL - 187

SP - 503

EP - 505

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -