Prevalence rates of major depressive disorders: The effects of varying the diagnostic criteria in an older primary care population

Hugh Hendrie, Christopher Callahan, E. E. Levitt, Siu Hui, B. Musick, Mary Austrom, John Nurnberger, W. M. Tierney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patients age 60 years and older (N = 3,767) were screened for depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A random sample of patients scoring ≥ 16 on the CES-D (n = 44) and of patients scoring < 16 (n = 81) were recruited to complete a structured psychiatric interview. The estimated prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), using a clinically derived diagnosis with the 'etiological' method, was 1.78%. When a computer-generated algorithm for MDD using the 'inclusive' method for counting somatic symptoms was applied, the estimated prevalence for MDD rose to 5.84%. All subjects with MDD diagnosed by any method had significantly higher scores on the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), compared with nondepressed subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-131
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Major Depressive Disorder
Primary Health Care
Depression
Population
Epidemiologic Studies
Sickness Impact Profile
Psychiatry
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{47ca3e5b224740ae9071d4d7f0a6ddb8,
title = "Prevalence rates of major depressive disorders: The effects of varying the diagnostic criteria in an older primary care population",
abstract = "Patients age 60 years and older (N = 3,767) were screened for depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A random sample of patients scoring ≥ 16 on the CES-D (n = 44) and of patients scoring < 16 (n = 81) were recruited to complete a structured psychiatric interview. The estimated prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), using a clinically derived diagnosis with the 'etiological' method, was 1.78{\%}. When a computer-generated algorithm for MDD using the 'inclusive' method for counting somatic symptoms was applied, the estimated prevalence for MDD rose to 5.84{\%}. All subjects with MDD diagnosed by any method had significantly higher scores on the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), compared with nondepressed subjects.",
author = "Hugh Hendrie and Christopher Callahan and Levitt, {E. E.} and Siu Hui and B. Musick and Mary Austrom and John Nurnberger and Tierney, {W. M.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1097/00019442-199500320-00004",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "119--131",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence rates of major depressive disorders

T2 - The effects of varying the diagnostic criteria in an older primary care population

AU - Hendrie, Hugh

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Levitt, E. E.

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Musick, B.

AU - Austrom, Mary

AU - Nurnberger, John

AU - Tierney, W. M.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Patients age 60 years and older (N = 3,767) were screened for depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A random sample of patients scoring ≥ 16 on the CES-D (n = 44) and of patients scoring < 16 (n = 81) were recruited to complete a structured psychiatric interview. The estimated prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), using a clinically derived diagnosis with the 'etiological' method, was 1.78%. When a computer-generated algorithm for MDD using the 'inclusive' method for counting somatic symptoms was applied, the estimated prevalence for MDD rose to 5.84%. All subjects with MDD diagnosed by any method had significantly higher scores on the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), compared with nondepressed subjects.

AB - Patients age 60 years and older (N = 3,767) were screened for depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). A random sample of patients scoring ≥ 16 on the CES-D (n = 44) and of patients scoring < 16 (n = 81) were recruited to complete a structured psychiatric interview. The estimated prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), using a clinically derived diagnosis with the 'etiological' method, was 1.78%. When a computer-generated algorithm for MDD using the 'inclusive' method for counting somatic symptoms was applied, the estimated prevalence for MDD rose to 5.84%. All subjects with MDD diagnosed by any method had significantly higher scores on the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), compared with nondepressed subjects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028916325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028916325&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00019442-199500320-00004

DO - 10.1097/00019442-199500320-00004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0028916325

VL - 3

SP - 119

EP - 131

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 2

ER -