Primary care physicians' medical decision making for late-life depression

Christopher Callahan, Robert S. Dittus, William M. Tierney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision making regarding late-life depression. DESIGN: Longitudinal collection of data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and content of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical trial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of late-life depression. SETTING: Academic primary care group practice. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians who completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical assessments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patients who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires. EVTERVENTIONS: Intervention physicians were provided with their patient's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patient-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionnaire regarding their clinical assessment. MAIN RESULTS: Those physicians not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patients as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians regarding their clinical assessments. A physician's clinical rating of likely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of treatment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were facilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was received by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to treat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patient doubts about treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treatment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did not consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatment decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients and physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and how accurately they make these judgments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)218-225
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1996

Fingerprint

Primary Care Physicians
Depression
Physicians
Therapeutics
Clinical Decision-Making
Group Practice
Primary Health Care
Decision Making
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • aged
  • depression
  • practice patterns
  • primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Primary care physicians' medical decision making for late-life depression. / Callahan, Christopher; Dittus, Robert S.; Tierney, William M.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 4, 04.1996, p. 218-225.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Callahan, Christopher ; Dittus, Robert S. ; Tierney, William M. / Primary care physicians' medical decision making for late-life depression. In: Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 218-225.
@article{2830c4a56a7a459aa6a8e5f9a84d4cac,
title = "Primary care physicians' medical decision making for late-life depression",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision making regarding late-life depression. DESIGN: Longitudinal collection of data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and content of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical trial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of late-life depression. SETTING: Academic primary care group practice. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians who completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical assessments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patients who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires. EVTERVENTIONS: Intervention physicians were provided with their patient's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patient-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionnaire regarding their clinical assessment. MAIN RESULTS: Those physicians not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patients as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians regarding their clinical assessments. A physician's clinical rating of likely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of treatment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were facilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was received by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to treat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patient doubts about treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treatment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did not consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatment decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients and physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and how accurately they make these judgments.",
keywords = "aged, depression, practice patterns, primary care",
author = "Christopher Callahan and Dittus, {Robert S.} and Tierney, {William M.}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/BF02642478",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "218--225",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care physicians' medical decision making for late-life depression

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Dittus, Robert S.

AU - Tierney, William M.

PY - 1996/4

Y1 - 1996/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision making regarding late-life depression. DESIGN: Longitudinal collection of data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and content of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical trial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of late-life depression. SETTING: Academic primary care group practice. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians who completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical assessments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patients who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires. EVTERVENTIONS: Intervention physicians were provided with their patient's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patient-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionnaire regarding their clinical assessment. MAIN RESULTS: Those physicians not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patients as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians regarding their clinical assessments. A physician's clinical rating of likely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of treatment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were facilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was received by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to treat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patient doubts about treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treatment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did not consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatment decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients and physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and how accurately they make these judgments.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To describe primary care physicians' clinical decision making regarding late-life depression. DESIGN: Longitudinal collection of data regarding physicians' clinical assessments and the volume and content of patients' ambulatory visits as part of a randomized clinical trial of a physician-targeted intervention to improve the treatment of late-life depression. SETTING: Academic primary care group practice. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred and eleven primary care physicians who completed a structured questionnaire to describe their clinical assessments immediately following their evaluations of 222 elderly patients who had reported symptoms of depression on screening questionnaires. EVTERVENTIONS: Intervention physicians were provided with their patient's score on the Hamilton Depression rating scale (HAM-D) and patient-specific treatment recommendations prior to completing the questionnaire regarding their clinical assessment. MAIN RESULTS: Those physicians not provided HAM-D scores were just as likely to rate their patients as depressed, as determined by specific query of these physicians regarding their clinical assessments. A physician's clinical rating of likely depression did not consistently result in the formulation of treatment intentions or actions. Treatment intentions and actions were facilitated by provision of treatment algorithms, but treatment was received by fewer than half of the patients whom physicians intended to treat. Barriers to treatment appear to include both physician and patient doubts about treatment benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of recognition of depressive symptoms did not appear to be the primary barrier to treatment. Recognition of symptoms and access to treatment algorithms did not consistently result in progression to subsequent stages in treatment decision making. More research is needed to determine how patients and physicians weigh the potential risks and benefits of treatment and how accurately they make these judgments.

KW - aged

KW - depression

KW - practice patterns

KW - primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029963175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029963175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02642478

DO - 10.1007/BF02642478

M3 - Article

C2 - 8744879

AN - SCOPUS:0029963175

VL - 11

SP - 218

EP - 225

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 4

ER -