Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Levels of Care

Stephanie Kakos Kraft, David Marrero, Emmanuel N. Lazaridis, Naomi Fineberg, Chunfu Qiu, Charles M. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. Objective: To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines. Participants and Methods: All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior. Results: Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P<.05). Conclusion: The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-37
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Family Medicine
Volume6
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1997

Fingerprint

Physicians' Practice Patterns
Primary Care Physicians
Diabetic Retinopathy
Physicians
Guidelines
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes Complications
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
General Practitioners
Referral and Consultation
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Insulin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kraft, S. K., Marrero, D., Lazaridis, E. N., Fineberg, N., Qiu, C., & Clark, C. M. (1997). Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Levels of Care. Archives of Family Medicine, 6(1), 29-37.

Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy : Current Levels of Care. / Kraft, Stephanie Kakos; Marrero, David; Lazaridis, Emmanuel N.; Fineberg, Naomi; Qiu, Chunfu; Clark, Charles M.

In: Archives of Family Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.1997, p. 29-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kraft, SK, Marrero, D, Lazaridis, EN, Fineberg, N, Qiu, C & Clark, CM 1997, 'Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Levels of Care', Archives of Family Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29-37.
Kraft, Stephanie Kakos ; Marrero, David ; Lazaridis, Emmanuel N. ; Fineberg, Naomi ; Qiu, Chunfu ; Clark, Charles M. / Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy : Current Levels of Care. In: Archives of Family Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 29-37.
@article{4805811edf0f4f25a4130284759fe1fa,
title = "Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy: Current Levels of Care",
abstract = "Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. Objective: To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines. Participants and Methods: All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63{\%}) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70{\%}) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior. Results: Physicians' responses were classified as {"}high,{"} {"}moderate,{"} or {"}low{"} based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35{\%} of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P<.05). Conclusion: The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.",
author = "Kraft, {Stephanie Kakos} and David Marrero and Lazaridis, {Emmanuel N.} and Naomi Fineberg and Chunfu Qiu and Clark, {Charles M.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "29--37",
journal = "Archives of Family Medicine",
issn = "1063-3987",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary Care Physicians' Practice Patterns and Diabetic Retinopathy

T2 - Current Levels of Care

AU - Kraft, Stephanie Kakos

AU - Marrero, David

AU - Lazaridis, Emmanuel N.

AU - Fineberg, Naomi

AU - Qiu, Chunfu

AU - Clark, Charles M.

PY - 1997/1

Y1 - 1997/1

N2 - Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. Objective: To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines. Participants and Methods: All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior. Results: Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P<.05). Conclusion: The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.

AB - Background: Diabetic retinopathy is a costly and prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus. Objective: To assess primary care physicians' self-reported practice patterns for the screening and detection of diabetic retinopathy relative to published guidelines. Participants and Methods: All primary care physicians (defined as general internists, family practitioners, and general practitioners) in Indiana were identified and surveyed using a mailed questionnaire. Of 2390 physicians, 1508 (63%) responded and were determined to be eligible. Of these 1508 physicians, 1058 (70%) completed all or some of the eye care-related questions. For each eye care practice, physicians were asked to specify the proportion of patients to which the practice was applied and the frequency (eg, every 3 months) with which the behavior was performed, if appropriate. Physicians were also asked to distinguish between patients with type I (insulin-dependent) and type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus for each practice behavior. Results: Physicians' responses were classified as "high," "moderate," or "low" based on the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Forty-five percent of the physicians' responses were classified as high for referring all of their patients with type I diabetes mellitus to an eye care specialist annually as were 35% of the physicians' responses for referring their patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Fewer physicians reported high levels of routine in-office funduscopic examination. No relationship was found between the extent to which physicians performed an in-office funduscopic examination and patterns of referral to eye care specialists. Logistic regression analysis suggested that recent graduates and general internists are most likely to report behavior that is considered high (P<.05). Conclusion: The diabetic retinopathy-related practice patterns of primary care physicians in Indiana differ significantly from published guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030638618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030638618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9003167

AN - SCOPUS:0030638618

VL - 6

SP - 29

EP - 37

JO - Archives of Family Medicine

JF - Archives of Family Medicine

SN - 1063-3987

IS - 1

ER -