Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD

Celette Sugg Skinner, Adam Buchanan, Victoria Champion, Patrick Monahan, Susan Rawl, Jeffrey Springston, Zhao Qianqian, Sara Bourff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Methods: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. Results: ∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p< .01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p< .01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p< .05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. Conclusion: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. Practice implications: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-312
Number of pages5
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Mammography
Telephone
Randomized Controlled Trials
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Self Efficacy
Fear
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Mammography
  • Tailored intervention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. / Skinner, Celette Sugg; Buchanan, Adam; Champion, Victoria; Monahan, Patrick; Rawl, Susan; Springston, Jeffrey; Qianqian, Zhao; Bourff, Sara.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 85, No. 2, 11.2011, p. 308-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48cca755d05e4b09bfa9a68df32c25d9,
title = "Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD",
abstract = "Objective: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Methods: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. Results: ∼83{\%} of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9{\%} vs. 0.4{\%}; p< .01); no exposure was higher for phone (15{\%} vs. 8{\%}; p< .01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p< .05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. Conclusion: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. Practice implications: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Mammography, Tailored intervention",
author = "Skinner, {Celette Sugg} and Adam Buchanan and Victoria Champion and Patrick Monahan and Susan Rawl and Jeffrey Springston and Zhao Qianqian and Sara Bourff",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.024",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "308--312",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD

AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg

AU - Buchanan, Adam

AU - Champion, Victoria

AU - Monahan, Patrick

AU - Rawl, Susan

AU - Springston, Jeffrey

AU - Qianqian, Zhao

AU - Bourff, Sara

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Objective: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Methods: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. Results: ∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p< .01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p< .01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p< .05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. Conclusion: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. Practice implications: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.

AB - Objective: Tailored, interactive mammography-promotion interventions can increase adherence if women are exposed to and find them usable. We compare exposure to and usability of interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD. Methods: Process evaluation measures from 926 women randomly assigned to telephone or DVD intervention and completing post-intervention surveys. Results: ∼83% of each group reported exposure to all content. Partial exposure was higher for DVD (9% vs. 0.4%; p< .01); no exposure was higher for phone (15% vs. 8%; p< .01). There were no differences in exposure by age or race. Full phone exposure was less likely for women who already made mammography appointments. Usability rating was higher for DVD (p< .05), driven by ratings of understandability and length. Usability of both interventions was correlated with lower baseline barriers, and higher fear, benefits, and self efficacy. Higher ratings for phone were associated with lower knowledge and contemplating mammography. Non-whites rated DVD better than whites. Conclusion: Both tailored interactive interventions had wide reach and favorable ratings, but DVD recipients had greatest exposure to at least partial content and more favorable ratings, especially among non-white women. Practice implications: This first evaluation of a tailored, interactive DVD provides promise for its use in mammography promotion.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Mammography

KW - Tailored intervention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053964139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053964139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.024

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.024

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 308

EP - 312

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -