"product" Versus "process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants

Aaron C. Moberly, Irina Castellanos, Kara J. Vasil, Oliver F. Adunka, David Pisoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypotheses: 1) When controlling for age in postlingual adult cochlear implant (CI) users, information-processing functions, as assessed using "process" measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, information-processing speed, and fluid reasoning, will predict traditional "product" outcome measures of speech recognition. 2) Demographic/audiologic factors, particularly duration of deafness, duration of CI use, degree of residual hearing, and socioeconomic status, will impact performance on underlying information-processing functions, as assessed using process measures. Background: Clinicians and researchers rely heavily on endpoint product measures of accuracy in speech recognition to gauge patient outcomes postoperatively. However, these measures are primarily descriptive and were not designed to assess the underlying core information-processing operations that are used during speech recognition. In contrast, process measures reflect the integrity of elementary core subprocesses that are operative during behavioral tests using complex speech signals. Methods: Forty-two experienced adult CI users were tested using three product measures of speech recognition, along with four process measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal fluid reasoning. Demographic and audiologic factors were also assessed. Results: Scores on product measures were associated with core process measures of speed of lexical/phonological access and nonverbal fluid reasoning. After controlling for participant age, demographic and audiologic factors did not correlate with process measure scores. Conclusion: Findings provide support for the important foundational roles of information processing operations in speech recognition outcomes of postlingually deaf patients who have received CIs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e195-e202
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Cochlear Implants
Automatic Data Processing
Demography
Short-Term Memory
Deafness
Social Class
Hearing
Recognition (Psychology)
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Cochlear implants
  • Cognition
  • Hearing loss
  • Process measures
  • Speech perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

"product" Versus "process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants. / Moberly, Aaron C.; Castellanos, Irina; Vasil, Kara J.; Adunka, Oliver F.; Pisoni, David.

In: Otology and Neurotology, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. e195-e202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moberly, Aaron C. ; Castellanos, Irina ; Vasil, Kara J. ; Adunka, Oliver F. ; Pisoni, David. / "product" Versus "process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants. In: Otology and Neurotology. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. e195-e202.
@article{36731850d14640819068e00698d9984d,
title = "{"}product{"} Versus {"}process{"} Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants",
abstract = "Hypotheses: 1) When controlling for age in postlingual adult cochlear implant (CI) users, information-processing functions, as assessed using {"}process{"} measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, information-processing speed, and fluid reasoning, will predict traditional {"}product{"} outcome measures of speech recognition. 2) Demographic/audiologic factors, particularly duration of deafness, duration of CI use, degree of residual hearing, and socioeconomic status, will impact performance on underlying information-processing functions, as assessed using process measures. Background: Clinicians and researchers rely heavily on endpoint product measures of accuracy in speech recognition to gauge patient outcomes postoperatively. However, these measures are primarily descriptive and were not designed to assess the underlying core information-processing operations that are used during speech recognition. In contrast, process measures reflect the integrity of elementary core subprocesses that are operative during behavioral tests using complex speech signals. Methods: Forty-two experienced adult CI users were tested using three product measures of speech recognition, along with four process measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal fluid reasoning. Demographic and audiologic factors were also assessed. Results: Scores on product measures were associated with core process measures of speed of lexical/phonological access and nonverbal fluid reasoning. After controlling for participant age, demographic and audiologic factors did not correlate with process measure scores. Conclusion: Findings provide support for the important foundational roles of information processing operations in speech recognition outcomes of postlingually deaf patients who have received CIs.",
keywords = "Cochlear implants, Cognition, Hearing loss, Process measures, Speech perception",
author = "Moberly, {Aaron C.} and Irina Castellanos and Vasil, {Kara J.} and Adunka, {Oliver F.} and David Pisoni",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MAO.0000000000001694",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "e195--e202",
journal = "Otology and Neurotology",
issn = "1531-7129",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "product" Versus "process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults with Cochlear Implants

AU - Moberly, Aaron C.

AU - Castellanos, Irina

AU - Vasil, Kara J.

AU - Adunka, Oliver F.

AU - Pisoni, David

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Hypotheses: 1) When controlling for age in postlingual adult cochlear implant (CI) users, information-processing functions, as assessed using "process" measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, information-processing speed, and fluid reasoning, will predict traditional "product" outcome measures of speech recognition. 2) Demographic/audiologic factors, particularly duration of deafness, duration of CI use, degree of residual hearing, and socioeconomic status, will impact performance on underlying information-processing functions, as assessed using process measures. Background: Clinicians and researchers rely heavily on endpoint product measures of accuracy in speech recognition to gauge patient outcomes postoperatively. However, these measures are primarily descriptive and were not designed to assess the underlying core information-processing operations that are used during speech recognition. In contrast, process measures reflect the integrity of elementary core subprocesses that are operative during behavioral tests using complex speech signals. Methods: Forty-two experienced adult CI users were tested using three product measures of speech recognition, along with four process measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal fluid reasoning. Demographic and audiologic factors were also assessed. Results: Scores on product measures were associated with core process measures of speed of lexical/phonological access and nonverbal fluid reasoning. After controlling for participant age, demographic and audiologic factors did not correlate with process measure scores. Conclusion: Findings provide support for the important foundational roles of information processing operations in speech recognition outcomes of postlingually deaf patients who have received CIs.

AB - Hypotheses: 1) When controlling for age in postlingual adult cochlear implant (CI) users, information-processing functions, as assessed using "process" measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, information-processing speed, and fluid reasoning, will predict traditional "product" outcome measures of speech recognition. 2) Demographic/audiologic factors, particularly duration of deafness, duration of CI use, degree of residual hearing, and socioeconomic status, will impact performance on underlying information-processing functions, as assessed using process measures. Background: Clinicians and researchers rely heavily on endpoint product measures of accuracy in speech recognition to gauge patient outcomes postoperatively. However, these measures are primarily descriptive and were not designed to assess the underlying core information-processing operations that are used during speech recognition. In contrast, process measures reflect the integrity of elementary core subprocesses that are operative during behavioral tests using complex speech signals. Methods: Forty-two experienced adult CI users were tested using three product measures of speech recognition, along with four process measures of working memory capacity, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, and nonverbal fluid reasoning. Demographic and audiologic factors were also assessed. Results: Scores on product measures were associated with core process measures of speed of lexical/phonological access and nonverbal fluid reasoning. After controlling for participant age, demographic and audiologic factors did not correlate with process measure scores. Conclusion: Findings provide support for the important foundational roles of information processing operations in speech recognition outcomes of postlingually deaf patients who have received CIs.

KW - Cochlear implants

KW - Cognition

KW - Hearing loss

KW - Process measures

KW - Speech perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042507074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042507074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001694

DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001694

M3 - Article

C2 - 29342056

AN - SCOPUS:85042507074

VL - 39

SP - e195-e202

JO - Otology and Neurotology

JF - Otology and Neurotology

SN - 1531-7129

IS - 3

ER -